Abstract
The alcohol harm paradox, whereby low socioeconomic position (SEP) groups experience greater alcohol-related harms at a given level of alcohol consumption, is not yet fully understood. In observational studies, key drivers are correlated and share similar confounding structures. We used multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) to estimate the direct causal effect of alcohol (drinks per week) and education (years of schooling) on multiple health outcomes, accounting for the effect of the other. Previously published genome-wide association summary (GWAS) statistics for drinks per week and years of schooling were used, and outcome summary statistics were generated from individual-level data from UK Biobank (N=462,818). Inverse variance weighted analyses demonstrated evidence for direct effects of alcohol and education on liver diseases (alcoholic liver disease: alcohol OR = 50.19, 95% CI 19.35 to 130.21 and education OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.53; other liver diseases: alcohol OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.94 and education OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58), mental and behavioural disorders due to alcohol (alcohol OR = 12.89, 95% CI 7.46 to 22.27 and education OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.75), and stroke (alcohol OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.89 and education OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.97). There was evidence for direct effects of education on depression, anxiety, influenza/pneumonia, and heart disease. In contrast, there was evidence of total (without considering the effect of education), but not direct, effects of alcohol on depression, influenza/pneumonia, epilepsy, and injuries. Although caution is required when interpreting these results, given weak instruments for alcohol, these results provide some evidence that the alcohol harm paradox is partially due to the protective effect of additional years of education. Replication with strong genetic instruments for drinks per week would be necessary to draw causal inferences.
Author Summary Individuals from lower socioeconomic position backgrounds tend to disproportionately experience alcohol-related physical and mental ill-health, despite reporting lower overall alcohol consumption than those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds. This is known as the alcohol harm paradox. One key difficulty in understanding this paradox is the methodological difficulty of establishing the relative contribution of multiple complex social behaviours. In this study, we used genetic variants associated with alcohol consumption and years of education to explore their direct effects on multiple health outcomes. The findings indicate that greater alcohol consumption and fewer years of education may each, independently increase the likelihood of developing various health conditions, including liver diseases, mental and behavioural disorders due to alcohol, and stroke. This may suggest that the alcohol harm paradox is due to the protective effect of additional years of education amongst those from higher socioeconomic position backgrounds, reducing their likelihood of developing the health conditions. However, these findings are preliminary and limited by various methodological issues, suggesting these findings should be interpreted with caution. Replication and further studies are needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
GS, HS, MM, LM, and JK are/were all members of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol when this work began. LM is now in Public Health Wales. This publication is the work of the authors, and they will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. GS is supported by a Wellcome Trust PhD studentship in Molecular, Genetic and Lifecourse Epidemiology (ref: 218495/Z/19/Z). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was sought from the UK Biobank (project 9142). UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC). The REC reference for UK Biobank is 11/NW/0382. Further details about the ethics approval sought for data collection in UK Biobank can be found online (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/learn-more-about-uk-biobank/about-us/ethics).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The method and discussion have been updated to clarify the data sources used and our interpretation of the findings.
Data Availability
UK Biobank data is available at www.ukbiobank.ac.uk. GSCAN data is available at doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0307-5. SSGAC data is available at doi:10.1038/nature17671.
