Abstract
Background The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) is a sentinel surveillance system to monitor the spread of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) gonorrhea. Under GISP surveillance strategy, urethral isolates are utilized for monitoring the spread of the resistance and the obtained estimates are used for informing the gonorrhea treatment guidelines. In 2017, the enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (eGISP) was established which also includes the non-urethral isolates. Using eGISP estimates for informing the gonorrhea treatment guidelines is an alternative surveillance strategy that can be used.
Methods We utilized our previously developed continuous-time agent-based model of gonorrhea transmission among the US men who have sex with men (MSM) population and calculated the total number of discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total discounted costs over 25 years under GISP and eGISP surveillance strategy. We also evaluated cost-effectiveness of both surveillance strategies.
Results Under GISP surveillance strategy, $2.9M (95% uncertainty interval: $23,131, $9.4M) were saved and 31.3 (0, 134.9) QALYs were gained in the simulated cohort of 10,000 US MSM over 25 years compared to no surveillance. Performing eGISP surveillance strategy instead would result in additional $57,449 (−$100,914, $221,663) saved and 0.59 (−0.79, 2.5) QALYs gained.
Conclusion The current GISP surveillance strategy significantly reduces the costs and increases the health benefits compared to no surveillance. However, switching from the current strategy to eGISP strategy is cost saving and should be considered in order to improve the population health and reduce the financial burden of gonorrhea.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding was received for this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The simulation horizon was changed from 35 years to 25 years. Subsequently, all the results were updated. The sensitivity analysis was expanded. Figure 1 and Figure 2 was combined. New Figure 2 was added.
