Abstract
Purpose Difficulties with emotion recognition can occur in neurodevelopmental conditions, including in autistic individuals. Providing interventions to support this would therefore be beneficial, particularly in terms of downstream effects on wellbeing, social relationships and education.
Methods In this online experimental study, we examined the effect of a recently developed facial emotion recognition training task versus a sham/control task in an adult population identifying as autistic over four sessions in a 2-week period, with a fifth follow-up session (N=184).
Results Our main analyses showed that facial emotion recognition accuracy was greater in Session 4 in the active group, with an estimated improvement of 14% (equivalent to approximately 7 additional correct responses), compared to 2% (equivalent to approximately 1 additional correct responses) in the sham group. Additional analyses suggested training effects were generalisable to facial stimuli that participants had not been trained on and were still present, although attenuated, two weeks later. We also observed some self-reported improvements in social interactions post-training.
Conclusion Overall, this study demonstrated improved emotion recognition in an adult autistic sample with this training task. Future work is needed to investigate the effect of this emotion recognition training on emotion recognition accuracy in autistic children, where support could be most beneficial.
Competing Interest Statement
MRM and IPV are co-directors of Jericoe Ltd, which produces software for the assessment and modification of emotion recognition. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol (BRC-1215-20011). This study was also supported by the University of Bristol School of Psychological Science Research Committee. This work was also supported in part by the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (Grant ref: MC_UU_00032/07).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study received ethics approval from the School of Psychological Science Research Ethics Committee at the University of Bristol (approval code: 260821118826).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data and analysis code that form the basis of the results presented here for all studies are available from the University of Bristol's Research Data Repository (http://data.bris.ac.uk/data/), DOI: To be added when published).
