Abstract
Background Advances in video image analysis and artificial intelligence provide the opportunity to transform the approach to patient evaluation through objective digital evaluation.
Objectives We assessed ability to quantitate Zoom video recordings of a standardized neurological examination the myasthenia gravis core examination (MG-CE), which had been designed for telemedicine evaluations.
Methods We used Zoom (Zoom Video Communications) videos of patients with myasthenia gravis undergoing the MG-CE. Computer vision in combination with artificial intelligence methods were used to build algorithms to analyze videos with a focus on eye or body motions. For the assessment of examinations involving vocalization, signal processing methods were developed, including natural language processing. A series of algorithms were built that could automatically compute the metrics of the MG-CE.
Results Fifty-one patients with MG with videos recorded twice on separate days and 15 control subjects were assessed once. We were successful in quantitating lid, eye, and arm positions and as well as well as develop respiratory metrics using breath counts. Cheek puff exercise was found to be of limited value for quantitation. Technical limitations included variations in illumination, bandwidth, and recording being done on the examiner side, not the patient.
Conclusions Several aspects of the MG-CE can be quantitated to produce continuous measures via standard Zoom video recordings. Further development of the technology offer the ability for trained, non-physician, health care providers to perform precise examination of patients with MG outside the clinic, including for clinical trials.
Plain Language Summary Advances in video image analysis and artificial intelligence provide the opportunity to transform the approach to patient evaluation. Here, we asked whether video recordings of the typical telemedicine examination for the patient with myasthenia gravis be used to quantitate examination findings? Despite recordings not made for purpose, we were able to develop and apply computer vision and artificial intelligence to Zoom recorded videos to successfully quantitate eye muscle, facial muscle, and limb fatigue. The analysis also pointed out limitations of human assessments of bulbar and respiratory assessments. The neuromuscular examination can be enhanced by advance technologies, which have the promise to improve clinical trial outcome measures as well as standard care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The work was supported in part by the MGNet a member of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network Consortium (RDCRN) NIH U54 NS115054. Funding support for the DMCC is provided by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Additional support was provided by NSF-I Corp award 838792 (47354/1/CCLS 91906F). Dr. Garbey is CEO of Care Constitution, which supported digital tools and AI algorithms
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of The George Washington University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
