The Sexual Harassment of Medical Students – Victims, Experiences, Impact, and Barriers to Reporting

Characteristics of Victims and Victimizers

Sexual harassment of medical students appears to be prevalent in unacceptable rates, and is a global concern.

Sexual harassment is often perpetrated by faculty/attendings/staff members (Babaria et al. 2012), and fellow students (Owoaje et al. 2012; Yadav et al. 2019; Waryam Singh Malhi et al. 2021; McClain et al. 2021), and patients (Xie et al. 2017; Vu et al. 2023). Further analysis revealed that women, as well as multi-racial students, were at greater odds of being harassed by faculty and staff (McClain et al. 2021). One study which examined students from all French faculties, 20% of female participants reported being victims of SH under the definition of French Law (Duba et al. 2020), meanwhile another study reported 1 in 4 students experienced harassment (Barbier et al. 2023). One particularly large French study reports student faced sexual harassment and aggression during their studies (Rolland et al. 2022). The perpetrators are typically male (Rees and Monrouxe 2011).

Female students have overwhelmingly experienced sexual harassment when compared to male students (Rees and Monrouxe 2011; Owoaje et al. 2012; Fried et al. 2012; Norman et al. 2013; Jendretzky et al. 2020; Vargas et al. 2021; McClain et al. 2021; Schoenefeld et al. 2021; Geldolf et al. 2021; Najjar et al. 2022; Faria et al. 2023; Ludwig et al. 2024). While trends show an increased rise in female victimization over time. Meanwhile, harassment was found to take place in both preclinical (Kisiel et al. 2020) and clinical years (Mahurin et al. 2022). Students from a sexual minority were more likely to be harassed then their heterosexual counterparts (McClain et al. 2021), while SH was perceived to be the greatest hinderance for sexual minorities in pursing dual-degrees like MD-PhD (Marr et al. 2022).

The single most important risk factor for victimization was female gender (McClain et al. 2021; Lisan et al. 2021). Surgical specialties like orthopedic surgery (Bruce et al. 2015; A 2020; Xu et al. 2023) and anesthesiology (Duba et al. 2020) are frequently implicated in sexual harassment events.

In one study, surgical departments were associated with a 5.7-fold increased odds of sexual harassment (Lisan et al. 2021), while another study reports more incidents of sexual violence with GP speciality registrars (Geldolf et al. 2021). Sexual harassment has been reported to take place in psychiatric wards and intensive care units (Waryam Singh Malhi et al. 2021), as well as inpatient academic setting and outpatient private practice setting (Mahurin et al. 2022), and global away electives (Edwards et al. 2022). A strong social position of a professor may influence a student to submit to sexual harassment (Paredes-Solís et al. 2011).

Harassment in the clinical context was prevalent, with males also reporting harassment during clinical training (Kisiel et al. 2020). More reports increasingly name perpetrators as medical doctors of male and female gender (Kisiel et al. 2020).

Experiences

Experiences of sexual harassment are varied among students and may range from inappropriate verbal comments to complete sexual assault requiring police involvement (McClain et al. 2021). Sexist and crude gender harassment were reported by students, as well as sexual coercion. Harassment via electronic communication was also reported (McClain et al.2021).

Students have reported behaviors such as comments on their clothes and appearance, and sexually offensive comments on more than one occasion (Kisiel et al. 2020). Demands for sexual services were noted in some studies (Kisiel et al. 2020). Other experiences include: inappropriate staring at the breasts and hips (Waryam Singh Malhi et al. 2021), exposure to pornography or sexual virtual content (Waryam Singh Malhi et al. 2021; Geldolf et al. 2021; Mahurin et al. 2022), being asked about their relationship or marital status (Mahurin et al. 2022), intentional exposure of genitals (Mahurin et al. 2022), sexually degrading comments and subtle sexual bribery (Jendretzky et al. 2020), being asked to undress with or without images being taken (Geldolf et al. 2021), attempts at kissing (Geldolf et al. 2021), unwanted sexual talk(Rees and Monrouxe 2011), rewards for sexual favors (Owoaje et al. 2012), and more (Wickramasinghe et al. 2022).

One exemplary response includes: “You are welcome to sit on my lap if there are no chairs left!”(Tameling et al. 2023). Another student states “I had a patient say something inappropriate when I was doing an abdominal exam about being touched near his groin.”(Brown et al. 2020).

One narrative states another example: “. I’m a third-year medical student; can I just scrub in today?” He looked at my breasts for about two minutes and said, “Well, you may as well while you’re still young and pretty enough to get away with it.”(Rees and Monrouxe 2011).

In several cases, such behaviors were repetitive (Geldolf et al. 2021; Ludwig et al. 2024), while students may become desensitized and accepting of inappropriate experiences over time (Babaria et al. 2012). Meanwhile, the use of violence, alcohol, drugs, and inability to escape have been cited as factors that facilitated these events (Geldolf et al. 2021).

Some students faced forced sexual contact including oral, anal or vaginal penetration (Geldolf et al. 2021), intercourse and rape, while the majority of these victims were female students (Schoenefeld et al. 2021). Male students have also reported unwanted oral sex and penetration (Geldolf et al. 2021).

Power dynamics result in bizarre experiences. Between one attending, a student recalled the following: “[He] started saying, ‘[You’re] just such a good medical student. You’re always just so interested. I can’t tell you, like, how gratifying it is for me to have you here,’ and he didn’t say anything that was outrageously inappropriate, but it was also clearly inappropriate for him to be like rubbing my neck while we’re alone walking through this hallway at eight p.m.” (Babaria et al. 2012).

Flirting and sexual innuendo was commonly experienced from male patients, with phrases such as “honey”, “sweetie”, and being asked to change their underwear, and masturbating while obtaining patient history (Babaria et al. 2012). As a result, women have reported concerns about their own self image, and proactively distancing themselves from male patients, or altering their attire to hide their “womanhood” such as using their coat as a cover (Babaria et al. 2012). Students were more comfortable with female patients (Babaria et al. 2012). Events of sexual assault occurred in similar rates between males and females in one study (Mahurin et al. 2022).

Impact

The impact of sexual harassment on medical students cannot be understated. Impact is far reaching and goes from academic disengagement to inspiring students to drop out of medical education entirely or change their specialty of interest. Evidence suggests a significant impact on the mental health of victims. Victims often screen positive for PTSD symptoms, increased anxiety and depression (Duba et al. 2020), major depressive disorder (Duba et al. 2020), dissatisfaction with their institutions, decreased perception to safety, and academic disengagement (McClain et al. 2021). Sexual harassment from faculty or staff member was more associated with depression than harassment from a fellow student (McClain et al. 2021). Meanwhile, having experienced sexual harassment or abuse among female students was significantly associated with a major depressive event (Rolland et al. 2022). While, one study reports that women felt more aggrieved by SH events when compared to male victims (Gágyor et al. 2012).

Students have reported the use of antidepressant therapy, anxiolytic therapy, and psychotherapy (Duba et al. 2020). Victims also report loss of confidence, regretting their career choice, substance abuse, and sleeping problems as the effects of mistreatment (Owoaje et al. 2012).

Meanwhile, females who reported SH experienced significant feelings of burnout (Mahurin et al. 2022). Students also reported significant feelings of cynicism and emotional exhaustion (Barbier et al. 2023), and guilt and progressive isolation (Babaria et al. 2012). Exposure to sexual harassment increased the odds of suicidal ideation and substance use (Barbier et al. 2023). Meanwhile, SH may inspire career intents to shift from city to rural areas (Padley et al. 2022).

Barries to Reporting

Lack of institutional response and fear for retaliation are common themes reported as barriers to reporting. Fear of being disadvantaged during clinical practice has been reported as a barrier to official reporting (Waryam Singh Malhi et al. 2021). Overall, the majority of those who experienced sexual harassment or sexual assault did not report it (Mahurin et al. 2022). Some reasons for this include that the student was not sure if the event was serious enough to report, and if the event involved a patient, they believed the patient did not intend it (Mahurin et al. 2022). Students report a fear of negative consequences from their supervisors, and feelings of shame and helplessness as barriers to reporting (Mahurin et al. 2022). Meanwhile, systemic reasons such as ineffectiveness of the report (Broad et al. 2018), lack of time and not knowing how to report were other reasons (Mahurin et al. 2022). Many students do not know the reporting methods for such events (Jendretzky et al. 2020), and this can be an area of improvement. Meanwhile, the majority of victims have reported the event to a close friend or family member, some sought professional consults, while rarely reported to the police (Geldolf et al. 2021). Overall, women report greater risk in reporting to their institutions then men (Siller et al. 2017).

Victims may respond to perpetrator behavior when they are pushed to their limits and no longer care about the potential consequences. On the other hand, they may not report due to maintaining politeness with their interactions with the perpetrator, or the simple fact that they were not going to see them again. Fear of tarnishing their professional reputation and long term career prospects is a common theme as a barrier to reporting. One student states: “I know that he’s doing my competency and filling in my feedback form in about the next half hour so I just stand there and take it.”(Rees and Monrouxe 2011). At times students simply do nothing due to organizational hierarchy which left them feeling disempowered (Rees and Monrouxe 2011). Finally, victims may report due to a strong moral sense that the abuse is wrong, not wanting another person to go through the same thing or knowing that someone else had similar experiences with the perpetrator (Rees and Monrouxe 2011). A cultural attitude shift is needed in the hospital and educational setting in order to support and empower medical students who are victims of SH.