Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the direct and indirect annual costs of epilepsy from the perspective of patients with epilepsy treated at a public tertiary center situated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Methods A cross-sectional cost-of-illness study was conducted, using a bottom-up approach based on interviews and records of 166 outpatients with confirmed diagnoses of epilepsy. Direct costs included expenses related to treatment, and transportation, while indirect costs encompassed productivity losses due to morbidity and mortality, assessed through the human capital approach and caregivers.
Results The majority of patients in the sample had refractory epilepsy (68.1%) and were on polytherapy (43.98%). The average per capita income of the sample was USD 434,90 per month, and 28.3% of the individuals were unemployed. The total costs amounted to USD 8,243.10 per patient per year, with 76.95% attributed to indirect costs, 23.05% to direct medical costs, and 2.31% to non-medical costs. The primary cost contributors included unemployment (30.42%), caregiver expenses (22.41%), and antiseizure medications (20.30%). The majority of patients reported purchasing all their medications (62.43%). The total out-of-pocket health expenses amounted to USD 2,090.10 per patient per year, with medications accounting for 90.89% of the expenses and transportation for 9.11%.
Conclusions In addition to unemployment as the main cost driver, the patients incurred catastrophic spending on medications. Even though treated in a public service, out-of- pocket health expenses made up 40.04% of the average per capita income of the sample and 12.85% of the Brazilian GDP per capita in 2021. The significant patient expenditures may contribute to poor adherence to epilepsy treatment, which can exacerbate the disease and lead to increased seizure frequency. This, in turn, reduces their ability to earn income, contributing to the rise in indirect and intangible costs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical endorsement for this study was secured from the IECPN research ethics committee, and the participation of all subjects was contingent upon the provision of informed and voluntary consent by the number 39119220.1.0000.8110.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
