Abstract
Background As health systems incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of patient care, there is growing interest in understanding how to ensure transparent and trustworthy implementation. However, little attention has been given to what information patients need about these technologies to promote transparency of their use.
Methods We conducted three asynchronous online focus groups with 42 patients across the United States discussing perspectives on their information needs for trust and uptake of AI, focusing on its use in cardiovascular care. Data were analyzed using a rapid content analysis approach.
Results Our results suggest that patients have a set of core information needs, including specific information factors pertaining to the AI model, oversight, and healthcare experience, that are relevant to calibrating trust as well as perspectives concerning information delivery, disclosure, consent, and physician AI use.
Conclusions Identifying patient information needs is a critical starting point for calibrating trust in healthcare AI systems and designing strategies for information delivery. These findings highlight the importance of patient-centered engagement when considering approaches for transparent healthcare AI.
Competing Interest Statement
XZ offers scientific input to research studies through a contracted services agreement between Mayo Clinic and Exact Sciences. JEM receives grant funding through Yale University from the FDA and Arnold Ventures. JEM also serves on the advisory board of GalateoBio and the board of directors for Bioethics International. BAB offers scientific input to research studies through a contracted services agreement between Mayo Clinic and Anumana, Inc. BAB also serves on the Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics and AI Advisory Council and on the Mayo Clinic Enterprise AI Translation Advisory Board. AMS, SAM, and JLR report no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award [U01FD005938] totaling $712,431 with 100 percent funded by FDA/HHS. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by FDA/HHS, or the U.S. Government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this study (protocol # 21-012302).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
