Abstract
Introduction Returning research results that indicate risk of Alzheimer disease (AD)-a disease for which no meaningful treatments or cure exist-to cognitively normal participants is controversial. AD is thought to begin many years before clinical signs and symptoms begin. During this time, individuals are cognitively normal, but have biomarkers that indicate pathophysiological changes in the brain. With this study, we aim to evaluate impact of returning research results on cognitively normal participants recruited from a longitudinal observational cohort on aging at the Knight Alzheimer Research Center (Knight ADRC) at Washington University in St. Louis.
Methods and analysis Our study uses a 2-year, delayed-start randomized clinical trial design. Participants are randomized to receive their research results either in 2-4 weeks or 1 year after informed consent. We plan to approach approximately 260 participants who have research results from previous genetic and biomarker testing at the Knight ADRC. The primary cognitive outcomes are 1-year change in subjective cognitive score (Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ® sum of boxes), objective cognitive score (psychometric composite score), and the primary psychosocial outcome is Impact of Event-Revised (IES_R) score 1 year after return of research results.
Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by WUSM Institutional Review Board and the Human Research Protection Office. Results from these trials are shared through conferences and publications.
Trial registration number NCT04699786.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04699786
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study has been given ethical approval by the Institutional Review Board and the Human Research Protection Office at Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
