Abstract
Background Heart failure (HF) is a global health challenge, with significant rates of hospitalization and mortality. Timely diagnosis is crucial for patient outcomes. Noninvasive imaging techniques assess early changes in HF but typically focus on specific aspects of the left atrium (LA) or left ventricle (LV). However, the close physiological interplay between the LA and LV suggests that indices evaluating both chambers, like the left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI), may offer superior diagnosis value for HF.
Method The cross-sectional study randomly selected 1145 people at a hospital in Vietnam. Following the exclusion criteria, 160 subjects were eligible for analysis and divided into patient and healthy control groups. The patient group consisted of 60 adults meeting the criteria for HF diagnosis according to the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline.
Results LACI levels were significantly higher in the HF group compared to the control group. Notably, LACI levels were higher in the HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) group than in the HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) group. The LACI showed a diagnostic value for HFpEF, with the highest AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.921 - 0.981, p<0.001) compared to LASr, LAScd, and LAVI, with an optimal threshold of 33.07 (sensitivity: 97.1%, specificity: 87.3%). In multivariate analysis, LACI was an independent factor of HFpEF when compared to standard indices for diagnosing HFpEF (OR = 1.144, 95% CI: 1.087–1.205, p<0.001).
Conclusion HF patients display increased LACI variability compared to healthy individuals, with the most significant increase observed in the HFpEF group. The LACI is an easily assessable parameter with potential value in diagnosing HFpEF.
What is already known on this topic Previous studies assessing the Left Atrioventricular Coupling Index (LACI) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have demonstrated its predictive role in cardiovascular risk. However, clinical practice shows that echocardiography can also calculate the LACI. Echocardiography is widely available and can be performed repeatedly. Despite its promising utility, no studies to date have utilized echocardiography-measured LACI for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
What this study adds Patients with heart failure exhibit significantly higher LACI compared to the control group. Among heart failure patients, HFpEF have the highest LACI values. Additionally, LACI demonstrates superior diagnostic value for HFpEF compared to current echocardiographic parameters recommended in clinical practice.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy This study holds promising potential by contributing to the development of a straightforward echocardiographic index that can diagnose HFpEF compared to current measures. Further research on LACI across diverse global populations could provide more compelling evidence of its efficacy. This could potentially lead to recommendations for integrating this index into clinical practice guidelines for guiding the clinical diagnosis of HFpEF.
Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract: Left Atrioventricular Coupling Index in Heart Failure Patients Using Echocardiography: A Simple Yet Effective Metric. HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LACI, left atrioventricular coupling index; LAVI, left atrial volume index, LASr, left atrial reservoir strain, LV GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal strain; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LAEDV, left atrial end-diastolic volume; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This cross-sectional study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hue University (No: H2021/044).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
In this revision of the manuscript, I have reorganized the order of the tables and made a minor adjustment in Table 1 to enhance accuracy and readability for the readers. These changes aim to improve the clarity and overall comprehension of the data presented. The revised structure allows for a more logical flow of information, making it easier for readers to follow the study's findings. The update in Table 1 addresses previous inaccuracies, ensuring that the data is both precise and accessible. This meticulous attention to detail reflects our commitment to providing high-quality and reliable research.
Data Availability
There is a restriction on sharing the dataset due to regulations from the Research Ethics Committee that approved the study and data protection laws, precisely document 13/2023/N?-CP in Vietnam. The informed consent obtained from our patients did not include a provision for third-party access to their medical information, which contains sensitive data such as date of birth, initials, date of admission, and discharge. As per the data use agreement with the Research Ethics Committee, the authors are not authorized to share or publicly release the data. The authors did not have any special access privileges to this data. Please contact Dr. Hai Nguyen Ngoc Dang (dangnngochai{at}dtu.edu.vn), who has access to the data in some necessary cases and with appropriate licensing.
