Abstract
Antimicrobial misuse in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) can include the inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics or prolonged dosing. In 2021, a pilot antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) was launched in Georgia, which involved developing and adapting SAP guidelines, establishing an interprofessional SAP prescribing approach, collecting surgical site infection (SSI) data via routinely collected data and telephonic patient follow-ups, and providing surgical unit staff with prescribing feedback and training on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). ASP introduction was staggered across ten hospitals over three years.
This study explored behavioural determinants of surgical teams’ ASP uptake in five hospitals where the ASP was introduced or about to be introduced. Findings primarily concerned epidemiologists’ and nurses’ ASP-related behaviour. Those at ASP non-introduced hospitals were less involved in the SAP prescribing process, had lower AMR awareness, and lacked professional development opportunities. Those at ASP-introduced hospitals exhibited higher AMR knowledge and felt ASP participation boosted confidence, facilitated work, and furnished key professional development.
Results indicate interprofessional collaboration on SAP prescribing supported ASP uptake across teams, and investment in health worker training and administrative encouragement ensured effective ASP participation and implementation. Findings highlight the crucial role of epidemiologists in SAP and illustrate a need for developing Georgian nurses’ AMR competencies as a vehicle to address public AMR knowledge gaps. Longer-term ASP uptake will need to consider the regulatory context in which hospitals lack access to national-level SSI data and feedback on SSI reporting but are fined for reporting non-compliance.
Despite resource limitations and a small sample size, the study engaged all pilot ASP health workers. Respondents’ inexperience of qualitative research participation and ensuant hesitation limited exploration of motivational factors supporting health workers’ ASP uptake, which could be explored in further research.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by grants provided by the Ministries of Health of Germany and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which had no role in data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data. The WHO Control of Antimicrobial Resistance Programme, under the Division of Communicable Diseases, Environnement and Health, was the recipient of these grants and coordinated the development of this study. This study was supported by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was approved by the WHO ERC on March 17, 2022, WHO Protocol ID: ERC.0003668 The Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia approved this research, IRB number 2021-066 on September 30, 2021.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
SN: writing original draft, review and editing, formal analysis
SKW: conceptualization, methodology, writing original draft, review and editing, formal analysis, resources, supervision
IK: project administration, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, resources
OK: data curation, formal analysis, visualization
MJ: data curation, formal analysis, visualization
NE: data curation, formal analysis, visualization
AP: data curation, formal analysis, visualization
DLFW: project administration, supervision
KK: conceptualization, methodology, writing original draft, review and editing, formal analysis, resources, supervision
Data Availability
Requests for the data used and/or analysed during the current study should be directed to WHO Regional Office for Europe.
