ABSTRACT
Background NAA10-related (Ogden Syndrome) and NAA15-related neurodevelopmental syndromes present with varying degrees of intellectual disability, hypotonia, congenital cardiac abnormalities, seizures, and delayed speech and motor development. While there is much data on the clinical manifestations of these conditions, there are few radiologic reports describing the neuroanatomical abnormalities present on imaging.
Objective Our goal was to provide neuroimaging analyses for a subset of probands with NAA10- and NAA15-related neurodevelopmental symptoms and assess severity, common radiologic anomalies, and changes over time to better understand the pathophysiology of these disease processes.
Materials and Methods Neuroimaging studies from 26 probands (18 with pathogenic variants in NAA10, 8 with pathogenic variants in NAA15) were collected and analyzed. Size of the cerebrum, brainstem, and cerebellum, as well as myelination, brain malformations, globus pallidus hyperintensity, brain lesions, 4th ventricle size, tegmentovermian angle, cisterna magna size, pituitary size, olfactory tract, palate arch, and choroid plexus abnormalities were analyzed. In depth medical histories were also collected on all probands, including genetic testing results and social, cognitive, and developmental history. The Vineland 3 Adaptive Behavior Scale was also administered to the parents to assess functional status of the probands.
Results On average, individuals with Ogden Syndrome had 5.7 anatomical abnormalities (standard deviation (SD) = 3.0), whereas those with NAA15 related neurodevelopmental syndrome had 2.8 (SD = 2.3) (p = .02). Probands who had more anatomical abnormalities tended to score worse on Vineland assessments, suggesting a possible correlation between the two. Structural-functional anatomic differences seen were preserved such that individuals with greater defects on, for example, motor regions of their scans tested worse on motor portions of the Vineland. Probands followed longitudinally demonstrated several changes between scans, most commonly in the cerebellum, brainstem, and degree of myelination. Such changes were only observed for probands with NAA10 variants in our cohort.
Conclusion Despite clinical imaging being reported as being predominantly “normal” during routine clinical care, this analysis of a cohort of patients with NAA10-related (Ogden Syndrome) and NAA15-related neurodevelopmental syndrome by one neuroradiologist has established a range of subtle abnormalities. We hope these findings guide future research and diagnostic studies for this patient population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD) and NIH NIGMS R35-GM-133408.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Both oral and written patient consent were obtained for research and publication, with approval of protocol #7659 for the Jervis Clinic by the New York State Psychiatric Institute - Columbia University Department of Psychiatry Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵# Co-first authors
Data Availability
All data are deidentified to protect patient privacy, and the underlying data cannot be shared due to these same privacy restrictions.
