ABSTRACT
Objectives To determine the impact of segmentation techniques on radiomic features extracted from ultrahigh-field (UHF) MRI of the brain.
Materials and Methods Twenty-one 7T MRI scans of the brain, including a 3D magnetization-prepared two rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE) T1-weighted sequence with an isotropic 0.63 mm³ voxel size, were analyzed. Radiomic features (histogram, texture, and shape; total n=101) from six brain regions -cerebral gray and white matter, basal ganglia, ventricles, cerebellum, and brainstem-were extracted from segmentation masks constructed with four different techniques: the iGT (reference standard), based on a custom pipeline that combined automatic segmentation tools and expert reader correction; the deep-learning algorithm Cerebrum-7T; the Freesurfer-v7 software suite; and the Nighres algorithm. Principal components (PCs) were calculated for histogram and texture features. To test the reproducibility of radiomic features, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare Cerebrum-7, Freesurfer-v7, and Nighres to the iGT, respectively.
Results For histogram PCs, median ICCs for Cerebrum-7T, Freesurfer-v7, and Nighres were 0.99, 0.42, and 0.11 for the gray matter; 0.84, 0.25, and 0.43 for the basal ganglia; 0.89, 0.063, and 0.036 for the white matter; 0.84, 0.21, and 0.33 for the ventricles; 0.94, 0.64, and 0.93 for the cerebellum; and 0.78, 0.21, and 0.53 for the brainstem. For texture PCs, median ICCs for Cerebrum-7T, Freesurfer-v7, and Nighres were 0.95, 0.21, and 0.15 for the gray matter; 0.70, 0.36, and 0.023 for the basal ganglia; 0.91, 0.25, and 0.023 for the white matter; 0.80, 0.75, and 0.59 for the ventricles; 0.95, 0.43, and 0.86 for the cerebellum; and 0.72, 0.39, and 0.46 for the brainstem. For shape features, median ICCs for Cerebrum-7T, FreeSurfer-v7, and Nighres were 0.99, 0.91, and 0.36 for the gray matter; 0.89, 0.90, and 0.13 for the basal ganglia; 0.98, 0.91, and 0.027 for the white matter; 0.91, 0.91, and 0.36 for the ventricles; 0.80, 0.68, and 0.47 for the cerebellum; and 0.79, 0.17, and 0.15 for the brainstem.
Conclusions Radiomic features in UHF MRI of the brain show substantial variability depending on the segmentation algorithm. The deep learning algorithm Cerebrum-7T enabled the highest reproducibility. Dedicated software tools for UHF MRI may be needed to achieve more stable results.
Competing Interest Statement
M.E.M. received honoraria for lectures from Siemens, General Electric, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/Dataset/2b24466d-f1cd-4b66-afa8-d70a6755ebea
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: M.E.M. received honoraria for lectures from Siemens, General Electric, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/Dataset/2b24466d-f1cd-4b66-afa8-d70a6755ebea