ABSTRACT
Introduction Digital adherence technologies (DATs) may enable person-centered tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring; however, implementation challenges may undermine their effectiveness. Using the RE-AIM framework, we conducted a scoping review to identify contextual factors informing “reach” (DAT engagement by people with TB) and “adoption” (DAT uptake by healthcare providers or clinics).
Methods We searched eight databases from January 1, 2000 to April 25, 2023 to identify all TB DAT studies. After extracting qualitative and quantitative findings, using thematic synthesis, we analyzed common findings to create meta-themes informing DAT reach or adoption. Meta-themes were further organized using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, which posits technology use is influenced by perceived usefulness, ease of use, social influences, and facilitating conditions.
Results 66 reports met inclusion criteria, with 61 reporting on DAT reach among people with TB and 27 reporting on DAT adoption by healthcare providers. Meta-themes promoting reach included perceptions that DATs improved medication adherence, facilitated communication with providers, made people feel more “cared for,” and enhanced convenience compared to alternative care models (perceived usefulness); and lowered stigma (social influences). Meta-themes limiting reach included literacy and language barriers and DAT technical complexity (ease of use); increased stigma (social influences); and suboptimal DAT function and complex cellular accessibility challenges (facilitating conditions). Meta-themes promoting adoption included perceptions DATs improved care quality or efficiency (perceived usefulness). Meta-themes limiting adoption included negative DAT impacts on workload or employment and suboptimal accuracy of adherence data (perceived usefulness); and suboptimal DAT function, complex cellular accessibility challenges, and insufficient provider training (facilitating conditions). Limitations of this review include the limited studies informing adoption meta-themes.
Conclusion This review identifies diverse contextual factors that can inform improvements in DAT design and implementation to achieve higher engagement by people with TB and healthcare providers, which could improve intervention effectiveness.
What is already known on this topic
Digital adherence technologies (DATs) are increasingly used to monitor TB treatment; however, systematic reviews suggest DATs have mixed effectiveness for improving TB outcomes and suboptimal accuracy for measuring medication adherence.
Inadequate DAT “reach” (engagement by people with TB) and “adoption” (uptake by healthcare providers) may contribute to their limited effectiveness and accuracy.
Understanding contextual factors influencing DAT reach and adoption may be critical to improve the design, implementation, and public health impact of TB DATs.
What this study adds
Our findings show people with TB value DATs when they improve adherence, enhance communication with providers, enhance convenience of care, and reduce stigma.
People with TB are less likely to engage with DATs in settings with barriers to cellular accessibility or when DATs are not designed for their literacy level, are technically complex, have suboptimal function, or increase stigma.
TB healthcare providers value DATs when they improve care quality or efficiency.
Healthcare providers are less likely to engage in settings with barriers to cellular accessibility or when DATs increase workloads, threaten employment, provide inaccurate adherence data, or have suboptimal function.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy
Our findings may inform future design of DATs to focus on what people with TB value, such as improved communication with providers and convenience of care.
Our findings may also help to identify settings in which DATs are unlikely to be effective, such as locations where cellular accessibility barriers are substantial due to poor infrastructure.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302115v1.full-text
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.11.24308660v1
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.24.24307907v1
