Abstract
Although food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) include guidelines for meat consumption, their setting most often do not explicitly include environmental considerations. For instance, in France, FBDG recommend consuming no more than 500 g of red meat and 150 g of processed meat per week. This study uses modeling to investigate the range of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) that can be achieved under FBDG compliance.
The study analyzed data collected in 2014 from 29,413 NutriNet-Santé participants to assess their adherence to the French FBDG. GHGe, cumulative energy demand (CED), and land occupation (LO) for organic and conventional foods were obtained from the DIALECTE database. Diets adequate in nutrients, culturally acceptable, and consistent with FBDG were modeled under different GHGe constraints. Environmental, nutritional, and health criteria were then calculated.
The average observed adequacy to FBDG was low (19%, SD=25%) and GHGe were 4.34 (SD=2.7%) kgCO2eq/d. The GHGe range of the diets varied from 1.16 to 6.99 kgCO2eq/d, depending up to ∼85% on the level of meat consumption. Similar associations were observed for CED, LO and Health Risk Score. At isoenergetic diets, the diet with the lowest emissions had a higher proportion of vegetables, whole grains, and plant-based substitutes. This diet had a lower CED, LO, and a greater proportion of organic foods when compared to the diet with the highest emissions.
While French dietary guidelines contribute, on average, to mitigating climate change and promoting health, this study emphasizes levers in recommended food consumption to more efficiently reduce diets’ GHGe and points to total meat as the critical issue to better account for pressure on climate change. Other environmental pressures should also be taken into account when designing dietary guidelines.
Highlights
The average greenhouse gas emissions of the observed diets was 4.34 (SD=2.70) kgCO2eq/d with an energy intake of 2080 Kcal/d
The diet that closely resembled the observed diet under the dietary guidelines, nutrient and acceptability constraints (TD model) had emissions of 5.15 kgCO2eq/d .
Modeled diets that complied with dietary guidelines and nutrient and acceptability constraints had emissions ranging from 1.16 kgCO2eq/d (model MinGHGe) to 6.99 kgCO2eq/d (model MaxGHGe).
All modeled diets had higher consumption levels of fruit, vegetable oils, pulses, and wholegrain products.
The MinGHGe and MaxGHGe diets, and the range of identified models in between, differed in their level of beef/lamb, refined cereals, fruit, pork, and snack products.
The level of meat, especially beef/lamb, explained most of the difference (up to ≈85%) in GHGe across models.
The level of total meat consumption varied progressively across models that imposed an increase in GHGe.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The NutriNet-Sante study is funded by the French Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Sante Publique France, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, and Sorbonne Paris Nord University. The BioNutriNet project was supported by the French National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) in the context of the 2013 Programme de Recherche Systemes Alimentaires Durables (ANR-13-ALID-0001). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, preparation of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the paper
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the French Institute for Health and Medical Research (IRB Inserm 0000388FWA00005831) and the National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, CNIL 908450 and 909216).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors have no competing interest.
Abbreviations: FBDG: Food-based dietary guidelines GBD: Global Burden of Diseases GHGe: greenhouse gas emissions P: percentile TMREL: theoretical minimum-risk exposure level
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos