Abstract
Background Applications of classical case-based reasoning (CBR) have given rise to a family of techniques we call “localized models”, in which a statistical model is fitted to a neighborhood of labeled cases matched by similarity to a target case. We aim to describe clinical and health applications of localized models to date and propose a general framework for their design and evaluation.
Methods We searched four bibliographic platforms during 2021 July 19–22, updated 2024 January 24. We set four eligibility criteria to identify applications of localized models to clinical and health tasks. Two authors divided title/abstract screening and reviewed screened entries for inclusion. We discussed settings, tasks, and tools; identified and tabulated themes; and synthesized the methods into a general framework.
Results Of 1,657 search results, 360 were reviewed, then combined with 43 publications that seeded the review and 1 obtained by citation tracking. 27 were included, published 1997–2022. The specificity of search terms was poor, and inter-rater reliability was low. Almost all models were predictive, the most common tasks being prognosis and diagnosis. Most studies used clinical, occasionally laboratory and image, data. Several addressed memory and runtime costs. A general technique that specializes to most of those reviewed involved matching, retrieval, fitting, and evaluation steps that could optionally be supervised, optimized, or recursively performed.
Conclusions Localized models have potential to improve the performance of clinical decision support tools while maintaining interpretability, but rigorous comparisons to competing methods must be conducted and computational hurdles must be overcome. We hope that our review will spur future work on efficiency, reproducibility, and user needs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding or other support for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
ac4569{at}mynsu.nova.edu, pattimccall.junkin{at}gmail.com, jason.brunson{at}medicine.ufl.edu
Data Availability
All data generated over the course of the study is freely accessible at links provided in the manuscript.
https://www.zotero.org/groups/5017571/imsr/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tpWMhYH2pyRT55K7n2J2XFs-kEV_JTuCDmXzJ4BBgNo/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xvDJwiLBoI2oz8fxHJ5MjNmiju_RAlK7RJv-wXe1DAs/