High burden of non-adherence to blood pressure-lowering medications: meta-analysis of data from over 34,000 adults with hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa

Leopold Ndemnge Aminde, Valirie Ndip Agbor, Noah Takah Fongwen, Calypse Ngwasiri, Clovis Nkoke, Miriam Nji, Anastase Dzudie, Aletta E. Schutte
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.28.24308082

Abstract

Introduction Non-adherence to blood pressure (BP)-lowering medication is a strong predictor of poor BP control. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has extremely low BP control rates (∼10%), but it is unclear what the burden of medication non-adherence among Africans with hypertension is. This systematic review estimated the prevalence and determinants of non-adherence to BP-lowering medications in SSA.

Methods Multiple databases were searched from inception to 6 December 2023. Two reviewers performed independent screening, extraction, and quality assessment of studies. We pooled the prevalence estimates using random effects meta-analyses and summarized the determinants using a narrative synthesis.

Results From the 1,307 records identified, we included 95 studies published between 1995 and 2023. The overall prevalence of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication among 34,102 people treated for hypertension in 27 countries was 43.5% (95% confidence interval 39.4 to 47.6; I2 = 98.3%). There was no change in the prevalence of non-adherence over time. The burden of non-adherence varied by measurement method (p = 0.028) and by median age (38.8%, > 57 years vs. 47.9%, ≤ 57 years; p = 0.015). Socioeconomic and patient-related factors were the most frequent factors that influenced medication adherence. Active patient participation in management, accurate perceptions, and knowledge of hypertension and its treatment predicted good medication adherence, whereas high pill burden, medication cost, side effects, and comorbidities predicted poor adherence.

Conclusions With the African population projected to increase from 1.4 to ∼2.5 billion by 2050, targeted strategies are urgently needed to optimise medication adherence in people with hypertension in SSA.

Introduction

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for disease burden globally, affecting nearly 1.3 billion adults (1), and contributing to over 10.8 million deaths each year (2). The prevalence of hypertension in sub-Saharan (SSA) is high, affecting about one in three adults and one in two people aged 50 years and over (3–6). In SSA, over half of the women and two-thirds of the men with hypertension remain undiagnosed. This high burden of hypertension contrasts with very low treatment and control rates. A recent global analysis found that only 22–29% of adults diagnosed with hypertension in SSA are treated; of these, only 9% of men and 13% of women have their blood pressure (BP) controlled (1). Pharmacotherapy and lifestyle modification are the mainstay of BP control to prevent vascular complications including stroke, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and dementia (3).

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines adherence as the extent to which a person’s behaviour— taking medication, following a diet, or executing lifestyle changes—corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider (7). Non-adherence to medication has been identified as a major predictor of poorly controlled hypertension. Compared to people who are adherent to BP-lowering medication, those who are non-adherent are twice as likely to have sub-optimal BP control and to develop complications of hypertension (8). Understanding the extent of non-adherence and determinants is critical to the development of appropriate interventions to prevent the health and economic consequences for affected persons and health systems. Prior reviews exploring adherence to BP-lowering medication have been limited by either narrow inclusion time periods (9, 10), restricted to one adherence measurement method (9, 11), lacked quality appraisal of the evidence (9), did not assess determinants of non-adherence (12), or had a broad geographical focus with limited representation of SSA (8, 13).

Given the high burden of hypertension, low rates of BP control in SSA, and the existing evidence gaps, this systematic review and meta-analysis sought to answer the following questions: 1) What is the contemporary burden of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication among people with hypertension in SSA, and has it changed over time? and 2) What are the determinants of (non-)adherence to BP-lowering medication in SSA?

Methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

The review protocol is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017079838) and published (14). This review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA 2020) guidelines (15). We searched MEDLINE via Ovid, SCOPUS, Web of Science, African Journals Online (AJOL) databases and grey literature through Google Scholar to identify all relevant articles from the inception of databases until 6 December 2023. Search terms related to BP-lowering medication and adherence were combined with relevant Boolean operators and a validated African search filter (16) to improve the sensitivity and precision of the search. No language restrictions were applied. See Tables S1-S4 for the detailed search strategies.

We included primary observational studies reporting the prevalence of or factors associated with (non-) adherence to BP-lowering medication among adults with hypertension residing in SSA. We excluded studies conducted out of SSA, studies that selected participants based on their medication adherence status, and those with incomplete data or lacking relevant data to compute the prevalence of non-adherence. We excluded studies with less than 30 participants, letters to the editor, commentaries, reports without primary data, or explicit descriptions of the methods. Duplicate studies based on the same data were excluded and only the most comprehensive report was retained.

Screening and data extraction

Following the database search, we uploaded all records to the Rayyan systematic review software (17) and removed all duplicates. Two investigators (LNA and FNT) independently screened titles and abstracts. Full texts of potentially eligible studies were assessed for final inclusion (LNA and VNA), and data was independently extracted by two reviewers (LNA, VNA, FNT, MAN, CAN, and CN). We resolved any disagreements by consensus discussion. The following data were extracted from individual studies: the last name of the first author and year of publication, year(s) of recruitment, the country, study design, study setting (rural vs urban) and study type (community-based vs. hospital-based), method or tool used to define medication adherence, approach to data collection (interview-administered vs. self-administered), sample size, total number of patients non-adherent to BP-lowering medication, mean or median age, and the male proportion. For multinational studies, we extracted the combined data first and, where possible, the disaggregated (country-specific) data. For studies reporting on factors associated with medication adherence, we extracted measures of association and confidence intervals for variables based on multivariable regression analyses.

Risk of bias assessment

We used the risk of bias tool developed by Hoy et al. (18) to evaluate the methodological quality of prevalence studies. The tool assesses selection/sampling methods, response rate, outcome measurement and validity of reporting. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess cohort studies (19), which includes eight items spread across three domains: selection of participants, comparability, and outcome assessment. Two reviewers (LNA and CAN) independently assessed the quality of studies and any disagreements resolved by consensus.

Data analysis

A random effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird method was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication. We used the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation to stabilize the variance before meta-analysis (20). We assessed between-study heterogeneity using Cochran’s Q test and the I2 statistic. I2 values < 30%, 30–49%, 50–74% and ≥75% represented low, moderate, substantial, and considerable variation in study-specific estimates due to heterogeneity (21). We performed multiple subgroup analyses to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. The Q test based on the analysis of variance was used to compare between subgroups. For studies reporting high, medium, and low adherence levels, as opposed to adherent vs. nonadherent, we defined non-adherence as having low adherence levels in the main analysis. We performed sensitivity analyses in which we classified medium adherence as non-adherent. Additionally, we estimated the prevalence of non-adherence using only studies with low risk of bias. We conducted an influence analysis to investigate the impact of individual studies on the pooled estimate.

To examine for small study effects, we used the Doi plot and the Luis-Furuya Kanamori (LFK) index. Compared to the traditional funnel plot and Egger’s regression test, these measures have been shown to have better visual representation of asymmetry and diagnostic accuracy in detecting small study effects. An LFK index of zero represents complete symmetry in the Doi plot, while any values beyond ± 1 are consistent with plot asymmetry (22, 23). All statistical analyses were conducted in R Studio (R version 4.2.3) using the ‘meta’ and ‘metasens’ packages.

Results

Overview of included studies

The search identified 1,315 records. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, we assessed 158 full texts for eligibility. We included 95 studies comprising 34,102 adults with hypertension in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Figure 1). There were two multi-country studies, one with twelve countries (24) and the other with two countries (25). Overall, most of the studies were conducted in Western SSA countries (n = 50, 47.2%), including Nigeria (n = 29), Ghana (n = 11), Côte d’Ivoire (n = 4), Togo (n = 2), and Benin, Guinea, Mauritania, Senegal with one study each. The second most represented region was Eastern SSA (n = 34, 32.1%), including Ethiopia (n = 23), Kenya (n = 3), Eritrea and Tanzania with 2 studies each, and Malawi, Mozambique, Seychelles, and Uganda with one study each. Next was Southern SSA (n = 13, 12.3%), with studies conducted in South Africa (n = 5), Zimbabwe (n = 3), Namibia (n = 2) and one each in Botswana, Lesotho, and Zambia. Finally, studies from Central SSA (n = 9, 8.5%) included Cameroon (n = 4), the Democratic Republic of Congo (n = 2), Congo (n = 2) and one in Gabon.

Figure 1:
Figure 1: PRISMA flow diagram depicting the selection of studies for inclusion in the review

The most frequently used tool to measure adherence was the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) (n = 25, 26.3%) (24–48). In 21 studies (22.1%), the authors used the proportion of days medication was taken (PDMT ≥ 80%) per week (49–69). The next most frequently used tool was the Hill-Bone Compliance Questionnaire (n = 11, 11.6%) (70–80). The pill count method was used in six studies (6.3%) (81–86), and only one study used biological assays (87). Most studies were cross-sectional (n = 89, 93.7%), whereas six were cohort studies (6.3%). Forty-eight (50.5%) studies were conducted in urban settings, five (5.3%) in rural, and forty-two (44.2%) in both urban and rural settings. Almost all the included studies were hospital-based (93.7%). About three-quarters (n = 67, 70.5%) of studies were rated as having a low risk of bias, whereas the remaining studies (n = 28, 29.5%) had a moderate risk of bias. (Table 1 and Tables S5-S7).

View this table:
Table 1: Sub-group analysis exploring differences in prevalence of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication in Sub-Saharan Africa

Burden of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication

Overall

The prevalence of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication from individual studies ranged from 3.5% (26) to 92.9% (69). The pooled prevalence of non-adherence across all studies was 43.5% (95% CI: 39.4 – 47.6), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 98.3%, p < 0.0001) (Figure 2). Meta-regression analysis showed no change in the prevalence of non-adherence over time (coefficient: −0.004, 95%CI: −0.011 to 0.004), (Figures S1 and S2). In sensitivity analysis, the prevalence of non-adherence was similar to the main analysis estimate when considering only studies with low risk of bias (Figure S3). However, classifying people in the medium adherence category (n=19 studies) as being non-adherent to their medication resulted in a higher overall prevalence of non-adherence (51.3%, 95%CI: 46.1 – 56.6; I2 = 99%) (Figure S4).

Sub-group analysis

The burden of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication varied by age (p = 0.014), with younger participants (< median age 57 years) having greater non-adherence (47.9%; I2 = 97.6%) compared to older participants (≥ 57 years) (38.8%; I2 = 97.6%) (Table 1 and Figure S5). Non-adherence also varied by measurement tool (p = 0.028). The prevalence of non-adherence was 39.8% (25 studies, I2 = 98.5%) for the most frequently used tool (MMAS-8), lowest (29.7%) among studies using other questionnaires (7 studies, I2 = 98.0%) and highest (61.9%) in studies using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (4 studies, I2 = 94.1%) (Table 1 and Figure S6). There was no sex difference in non-adherence to BP-lowering medication (47.4%, 43 studies with 9,903 women vs. 48.2%, 44 studies with 16,733 men, p = 0.855). There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of non-adherence between Southern SSA (35.4%, 13 studies, I2 = 98.2%) compared to Western SSA (42.1%, 50 studies, I2 = 98.5%), Central SSA (43.2%, 9 studies, I2 = 95.2%) and Eastern SSA (43.6%, 34 studies, I2 = 97.4%) (p = 0.613). Similarly, the prevalence of non-adherence did not differ by location (49.7% for rural vs. 43.5% for urban; p = 0.233), study settings, study design, sample size, sampling method, period of data collection or data collection approach (Table 1 and Figures S7–S16).

Influence analysis and publication bias

The influence analysis found no evidence that any individual study-specific estimate significantly influenced the pooled estimate (Figure S17). Additionally, we found no evidence of small study effects as the Doi plot was visually symmetrical, and confirmed with the LFK statistic (LFK index = 0.56) (Figure S18).

Factors associated with medication non-adherence

Figure 3 and Table S8 present the details of the predictors of medication non-adherence, which are summarised below.

Figure 3:
Figure 3: Factors associated with medication (non-)adherence in sub-Saharan Africa classified according to the World Health Organization dimensions for adherence to medication in people with hypertension

Demographic and socioeconomic factors

Age, sex, and area: All but one (69) of six studies found that being male was associated with non-adherence to medication (88–92). Additionally, three out of five studies showed younger adults (generally < 40 years) were more likely to be non-adherent to medication compared to older adults (48, 84, 93), but two studies found the contrary (89, 94). One study reported that residing in rural areas was associated with non-adherence (94).

Education: All five studies showed that lower levels of education were associated with non-adherence to medication (41, 67, 82, 86, 95).

Employment and income: Being unemployed was associated with poor medication adherence in four studies (32, 71, 90–92), whereas three authors found the opposite relationship (32, 43, 67). Additionally, three (24, 67, 76) out of five studies reported that higher income/wealth status was associated with good medication adherence, whereas the converse was found in two studies (71, 93).

Social support: All but one (71) of four studies (32, 41, 71, 75) noted that having good family/friend support was associated with good medication adherence, with odds ratios ranging from two (32) to over five-fold (75).

Distance from health facility: Two studies showed that people experiencing high cost or lack of transport had over three times the odds of being non-adherent to medication (72, 92); individuals with shorter distances to the hospital had a two-fold higher odds of being adherent (aOR: 2.02, 1.19 to 3.43) (88).

Medication cost and availability: Unavailability of medication was associated with non-adherence to medication (71, 81, 95, 96), with the odds ranging from 1.7 (95%CI: 1.1 to 3.3) in a study in Tanzania (81) to 5.4 (95%CI: 1.76 to 16.85) in Namibia (71). All seven studies investigating cost coverage for medication found that compared to having free medication or funded by others/insurance/government schemes, self-funded or out-of-pocket costs were associated with non-adherence to medication (34, 36, 41, 46, 48, 81, 95).

Patient-related factors

Active participation in management: All eight studies found that patients who actively participated in the management of their BP through regular attendance to clinic appointments (71, 75, 91), health talks (92), having good self-efficacy (82, 90) and not stopping medication when asymptomatic (70, 81) were more likely to have good medication adherence.

Understanding and perceptions about hypertension: Patients with a good understanding of hypertension were three to nine times as likely to be adherent to their medication compared to those who had a poor understanding of the condition (27, 34, 45, 88–90, 92).

Knowledge and skill in managing symptoms and treatment: Patients with adequate knowledge and skill had 3 to 13-fold higher odds of being adherent to medication compared to their counterparts (30, 37, 70, 87, 88, 94, 95, 97).

Perception of the health risk related to hypertension: All but one (27) of four studies found that people with accurate perceptions had higher odds of being adherent to their medication (32, 96, 97).

Comorbidities: In six studies, patients with one or more comorbidities were over twice as likely to be non-adherent to their medication (36, 43, 61, 84, 88, 95). One study reported that those without a comorbid condition were about four times as likely to be adherent to their medication (34).

Alcohol use and smoking: All studies evaluating the impact of alcohol use (27, 36, 37, 70) and smoking (61, 70) found that both behaviours were associated with low or non-adherence to medication.

Stress and forgetfulness: Patients who reported being stressed were twice as likely to be non-adherent to medication, whereas being forgetful was associated with about 8-fold higher odds of non-adherence to medication (45, 46).

Others: Persons using non-prescribed medication (96) or traditional medications (24) were twice as likely to be non-adherent to their BP-lowering medication. Similarly, being physical inactive (aOR: 1.63, 1.04 to 2.55) was associated with non-adherence to medication (43).

Therapy-related factors

Pill burden: Eight studies reported that high pill burden was associated with non-adherence to medication (36, 46, 84, 86, 89, 93, 94, 98), with poorer adherence in people taking two or more BP-lowering pills (36, 46, 89, 94).

Side-effects: All six studies showed that those who experienced side effects (such as dizziness (72), palpitation (70)) were two to seven times more likely to be non-adherent to their medication (37, 46, 70, 72, 82, 96).

Duration of diagnosis and treatment: Three studies showed that people who had been diagnosed or on treatment for longer than one (37), five (98) or ten years (93) were more likely to be non-adherent, while two studies showed that being on treatment for three or more years was associated with good medication adherence (34, 76).

BP control and class of BP-lowering medication: All three studies exploring the relation with BP control found that people with well-controlled BPs were two to three times more likely to be adherent to their medication (61, 88, 96). Two studies found a significant relationship between the use of calcium-channel blockers and medication adherence, although both had differing conclusions (24, 37).

Healthcare team/health system factors

Good patient-doctor relationships: This was associated with up to four-fold higher odds of adherence (34), whereas a poor relationship was associated with non-adherence to medication (95).

Health education: Two studies showed that patients who did not receive health education or counselling when attending health facilities were twice as likely to be non-adherent to their medication (41, 96).

Discussion

This systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the burden of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication among adults with hypertension in SSA. At least two out of every five adults on treatment for hypertension in SSA were non-adherent to their medication. Non-adherence was higher in younger (mean age < 57 years) adults compared to older adults, and it varied by measurement method. Socioeconomic- and patient-related factors were the most frequently reported drivers of medication adherence in SSA. There was consistent evidence that active patient participation in management, accurate understanding and perceptions, and knowledge of hypertension and its treatment predicted good adherence to medication, while high pill burden (mostly more than two pills per day), medication cost, experiencing side effects, and having comorbidities predicted poor adherence.

The overall prevalence of non-adherence in this study was lower than the 62.5% and 65.9% reported by previous studies in Africa (9, 10). These reviews had very narrow periods for which data was included, ranging from seven to eleven years, as opposed to the present review, which pooled data from studies published over the last three decades. Nevertheless, the estimates of the present study are on par with findings from a global meta-analysis that found a prevalence of non-adherence—measured using questionnaires—of 43% in LMICs, which was higher than the 26% to 38% reported from high-income countries (8).

Non-adherence to BP-lowering medication was higher in studies with younger populations compared to those with older persons, consistent with reports from both LMICs and HICs (8, 13, 99). Older adults are more likely to have chronic conditions and to dedicate more time to their health and therapy. Furthermore, the use of adherence aids like pill boxes and calendars likely enhances their ability to adhere to medication (100). We also found variations in the pooled prevalence of non-adherence by the tool used in assessing medication adherence, consistent with previous reviews (8, 13). There is currently no gold standard for measuring adherence. Thus, the observed variation could reflect differences inherent to the respective tools (101, 102).

Socioeconomic and patient-related factors were the major drivers reported for non-adherence to BP-lowering medications. This is consistent with prior systematic reviews (10, 11, 13). However, we found conflicting results for age and employment status. While some studies showed that older age was associated with good adherence, three out of five studies reported an inverse relationship. The latter could be due to declining cognitive ability with ageing. Being employed is correlated with higher socioeconomic status and access to healthcare services, which could explain better adherence (13). In contrast, the association between employment and non-adherence could be due to patients prioritizing their job schedules. These mixed results likely indicate a complex relationship between age, employment, and medication adherence and potential differences in study settings.

Active patient participation and good knowledge of hypertension, and their treatment were the main patient-specific factors consistently associated with good medication adherence. Targeted interventions promoting these attributes should be a key focus in SSA. There is growing evidence elsewhere about the benefits of active patient involvement in decision-making about their health and adherence to therapy (100, 103, 104). These benefits include increased satisfaction, quality of life, and improved understanding of hypertension.

Comorbidities, experiencing medication side effects, and taking multiple pills were associated with medication non-adherence. Similar results were reported among older adults (11). People with multiple chronic conditions are likely to have a high pill burden and incur significant out-of-pocket health expenditures (105, 106). This is a particular challenge for patients in LMICs such as SSA with limited insurance or universal health coverage (107). There is strong evidence that most people with high BP require two medications to control their BP. Hence, simplifying treatments through single-pill combinations (SPC) is likely to address the problem of pill burden and adherence, with spin-offs like improved quality of life, reduced clinical inertia and lower healthcare costs (108–110).

Implications of the findings

The population of Africa is projected to increase from 1.4 billion now to ∼2.5 billion by 2050, representing the fastest population growth worldwide (111). Our analysis shows the prevalence of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication has not changed over time. With one in three adults having hypertension (4), health systems in SSA can expect to manage ∼825 million people with hypertension. Assuming this pattern continues, this would approximate to over 350 million patients not adherent to their medication, and at increased risk of cardiovascular events. This represents a substantial challenge for already struggling health systems. Hence, in addition to prioritising primordial prevention, governments in SSA need to develop sustainable longterm strategies. For example, accelerating progress towards universal health coverage for the delivery of quality and equitable healthcare for all, and fostering team-based care to improve healthcare provider-patient ratios and relationships (112). Furthermore, with SPCs now on the WHO Essential Medicines List (113), stakeholders involved in BP control should adopt simple and practical treatment guidelines incorporating SPCs. Additionally, governments need to facilitate supply chains that enhance the availability of these SPCs for patients. Such strategies would contribute to improving adherence to therapy, BP control and CVD outcomes.

Strengths and limitations

The review had some limitations. First, most of the included studies were hospital-based. Hence, the estimate of medication non-adherence may be biased by the ‘white coat adherence’ phenomenon, whereby patients are more adherent in the days leading up to and immediately after their clinic visit (114, 115). Consequently, the prevalence presented in this study may be an underestimation of the true prevalence of medication non-adherence in SSA. Second, over half of the included studies were from western SSA, with lower representations from central and southern SSA. Furthermore, there were comparatively fewer studies conducted in rural areas. Hence, the estimate from this review might not be generalizable to the whole of SSA. Third, there was substantial heterogeneity between the studies, which was not completely explained by the variables in the sub-group analyses. Furthermore, the prevalence of non-adherence varied based on the adherence measurement method. More research is needed to develop standardized cost-effective and pragmatic tools for assessing medication adherence for research and clinical practice in SSA. Despite these shortcomings, this systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence from mostly high-quality studies on the burden and determinants of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication in SSA.

Conclusions

This systematic review showed a substantially high burden of non-adherence to BP-lowering medication among adults with hypertension in SSA; two out of every five adults treated for hypertension are not adherent to their therapy, and this has not changed over the last three decades. Targeted policies are needed to address the broad range of socioeconomic, health system, therapy, and patient-related factors driving this high burden of medication non-adherence in SSA.

Funding

None.

Competing interests

None.

Data availability

All data underpinning this review are provided in the main manuscript and supplementary files.

References

  1. 1.↵
    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(11):785–802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Ataklte F, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Taye B, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne AP. Burden of undiagnosed hypertension in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2015;65(2):291–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.
    Kaze AD, Schutte AE, Erqou S, Kengne AP, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB. Prevalence of hypertension in older people in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017;35(7):1345–52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Bosu WK, Reilly ST, Aheto JMK, Zucchelli E. Hypertension in older adults in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
  8. 8.↵
    Lee EKP, Poon P, Yip BHK, Bo Y, Zhu MT, Yu CP, et al. Global Burden, Regional Differences, Trends, and Health Consequences of Medication Nonadherence for Hypertension During 2010 to 2020: A Meta-Analysis Involving 27 Million Patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(17):e026582.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Abegaz TM, Shehab A, Gebreyohannes EA, Bhagavathula AS, Elnour AA. Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(4):e5641.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Shin J, Konlan KD. Prevalence and determinants of medication adherence among patients taking antihypertensive medications in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis 2010-2021. Nurs Open. 2023;10(6):3506–18.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Uchmanowicz B, Jankowska EA, Uchmanowicz I, Morisky DE. Self-Reported Medication Adherence Measured With Morisky Medication Adherence Scales and Its Determinants in Hypertensive Patients Aged ≥60 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:168.
  12. 12.↵
    Biffi A, Rea F, Iannaccone T, Filippelli A, Mancia G, Corrao G. Sex differences in the adherence of antihypertensive drugs: a systematic review with meta-analyses. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e036418.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Nielsen J, Shrestha AD, Neupane D, Kallestrup P. Non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medication in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 92443 subjects. J Hum Hypertens. 2017;31(1):14–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Agbor VN, Takah NF, Aminde LN. Prevalence and factors associated with medication adherence among patients with hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020715.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Sandy C. Health sciences search filters: geographic filters for Africa. Edmonton, AB.: University of Alberta.; 2017 [
  17. 17.↵
    Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C, et al. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(9):934–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Wells GS, B; O’Connell, D; Peterson, J; Welch, V; Losos, M; Tugwell, P;. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, Canada: The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2013 [cited 2024 21 February]. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  20. 20.↵
    Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, Norman RE, Vos T. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(11):974–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Higgins JT, J; Chandler, J; Cumpston, M; Li, T; Page, MJ; Welch, VA; (editors),. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane; 2023 [cited 2024 21 February]. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
  22. 22.↵
    Furuya-Kanamori L, Barendregt JJ, Doi SAR. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018;16(4):195–203.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Hunter JP, Saratzis A, Sutton AJ, Boucher RH, Sayers RD, Bown MJ. In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(8):897–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Macquart de Terline D, Kane A, Kramoh KE, Ali Toure I, Mipinda JB, Diop IB, et al. Factors associated with poor adherence to medication among hypertensive patients in twelve low and middle income Sub-Saharan countries. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219266.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Boima V, Ademola AD, Odusola AO, Agyekum F, Nwafor CE, Cole H, et al. Factors Associated with Medication Nonadherence among Hypertensives in Ghana and Nigeria. Int J Hypertens. 2015;2015:205716.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Okunrinboye HI, Otakpor AN, Ilesanmi OS. Depression and medication-adherence in patients with hypertension attending a tertiary health facility in South-West Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33:27.
  27. 27.↵
    Sarkodie E, Afriyie DK, Hutton-Nyameaye A, Amponsah SK. Adherence to drug therapy among hypertensive patients attending two district hospitals in Ghana. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20(3):1355–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.
    Gala P, Moshokgo V, Seth B, Ramasuana K, Kazadi E, M’Buse R, et al. Medication Errors and Blood Pressure Control Among Patients Managed for Hypertension in Public Ambulatory Care Clinics in Botswana. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(2):e013766.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.
    Akintunde AA, Akintunde TS. Antihypertensive Medications Adherence Among Nigerian Hypertensive Subjects in a Specialist Clinic Compared to a General Outpatient Clinic. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5(3):173–8.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Adeoye AM, Adebiyi AO, Adebayo OM, Owolabi MO. Medication adherence and 24-h blood pressure in apparently uncontrolled hypertensive Nigerian patients. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2019;26(1):18–24.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.
    Labaran KM, S; Maiha, BB; Giwa, A; Maaji, HU; Yusuf, H; Ibrahim, AW;. Validity evidence of adapted Hausa version of 8-item Morisky Medication adherence scale in patients with hypertension in North-western Nigeria. Bayero J P Appl Sci. 2018;11(1):244–50.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    D GT, Berhane Y, Worku A. Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment and Associated Factors in Central Ethiopia. Int J Hypertens. 2020;2020:9540810.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.
    Olowe OA, Ross AJ. Knowledge, adherence and control among patients with hypertension attending a peri-urban primary health care clinic, KwaZulu-Natal. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017;9(1):e1–e7.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Mekonnen HS, Gebrie MH, Eyasu KH, Gelagay AA. Drug adherence for antihypertensive medications and its determinants among adult hypertensive patients attending in chronic clinics of referral hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;18(1):27.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.
    Amadi CA, OA; Joda, AE; Mbakwem, AC; Ajuluchukwu, JN;. Self reported adherence to Antihypertensive drugs in a Nigerian population using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Nig Qt J Hosp Med. 2014;24(2):144–9.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Asgedom SW, Atey TM, Desse TA. Antihypertensive medication adherence and associated factors among adult hypertensive patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, southwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Berhe DF, Taxis K, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Mulugeta A, Mengistu YT, Burgerhof JGM, Mol PGM. Impact of adverse drug events and treatment satisfaction on patient adherence with antihypertensive medication - a study in ambulatory patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(9):2107–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.
    Otenyo SM, A;. Factors affecting adherence to antihypertensive medication regimen among hemodialysis patients attending a private hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;9(2):755–60.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.
    Ibrahim UM, S; Zezi, AU; Lawal, BK;. Adherence to antihypertensive medications in patients attending public hospitals in Kano state, Nigeria. Bayero J P Appl Sci. 2019;12(1):395–400.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.
    Jande MK, DM; Sravanam, P; Marwa, C; Madlan, B; Burger, J; Godman, B; Oluka, M; Massele, A; Mwita, S;. Patient-related beliefs and adherence towards their medications among the hypertensive outpatients in Tanzania. J Compar Eff Res. 2017;6(3):185–93.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Kebede BM, M;. Antihypertensive medication non-adherence and predictors among adult patients on follow-up, Ethiopia: Prospective cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Pharm. 2020;22(2):70-9.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.
    Akpor OO, FO;. Treatment satisfaction and medication adherence among hypertensive patients in a teaching hospital in Ekiti State, Nigeria. J Integr Nurs. 2022;4(2):59–67.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    Simegn BK, Chelkeba L, Alamirew BD. Clinicians’ prescribing pattern, rate of patients’ medication adherence and its determinants among adult hypertensive patients at Jimma University Medical Center: Prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0259421.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.
    Kebede B, Chelkeba L, Dessie B. Rate of blood pressure control and its determinants among adult hypertensive patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia: Prospective cohort study. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:20503121211006000.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Akoko BM, Fon PN, Ngu RC, Ngu KB. Knowledge of Hypertension and Compliance with Therapy Among Hypertensive Patients in the Bamenda Health District of Cameroon: A Cross-sectional Study. Cardiol Ther. 2017;6(1):53–67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Adidja NM, Agbor VN, Aminde JA, Ngwasiri CA, Ngu KB, Aminde LN. Non-adherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in Buea, Cameroon: a cross-sectional community-based study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):150.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. 47.
    Kretchy IA, Owusu-Daaku FT, Danquah SA. Mental health in hypertension: assessing symptoms of anxiety, depression and stress on anti-hypertensive medication adherence. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014;8:25.
  48. 48.↵
    Okello S, Nasasira B, Muiru AN, Muyingo A. Validity and Reliability of a Self-Reported Measure of Antihypertensive Medication Adherence in Uganda. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158499.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Lunt DW, Edwards PR, Steyn K, Lombard CJ, Fehrsen GS. Hypertension care at a Cape Town community health centre. S Afr Med J. 1998;88(5):544–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. 50.
    Hoffman RM, Chibwana F, Kahn D, Banda BA, Phiri L, Chimombo M, et al. High Rates of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure in Malawian Adults Living with HIV and Hypertension. Glob Heart. 2021;16(1):81.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.
    Omolase CA, O; Omolase, BO;. Drug Compliance amongst hypertensives in a Nigerian community. TAF Prev Med Bulletin. 2011;10(2):145–8.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.
    Beune E, Nieuwkerk P, Stronks K, Meeks K, Schulze MB, Mockenhaupt FP, et al. Medication non-adherence and blood pressure control among hypertensive migrant and non-migrant populations of sub-Saharan African origin: the RODAM study. J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33(2):131–48.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.
    Okeahialam B. Adherence and preference issues in anti-hypertensive therapy: Experience from a Private medical facility in Jos, Nigeria. J Med Tropics. 2011;13(0):11–4.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.
    Amira CO, Okubadejo NU. Factors influencing non-compliance with anti-hypertensive drug therapy in Nigerians. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007;14(4):325–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. 55.
    Tozivepi SN, Takawira S, Chikaka E, Mundagowa P, Chadambuka EM, Mukora-Mutseyekwa F. The Nexus Between Adherence to Recommended Lifestyle Behaviors and Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients at Mutare Provincial Hospital, Zimbabwe: A Cross-Sectional Study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:1027-37.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.
    Fentaw Z, Adamu K, Wedajo S. Blood pressure control status of patients with hypertension on treatment in Dessie City Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):917.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.
    Thinyane KH, Mothebe T, Sooro M, Namole LD, Cooper V. An observational study of hypertension treatment and patient outcomes in a primary care setting. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:424.
  58. 58.
    Sisay YA, H; Biratu, TD; Legesse, TG;. Uncontrolled Hypertension and Behavioral Risk Factors among Adult Hypertensive Patients at Saint Paul’s Hospital, Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Advances in Public Health. 2022;2022:Article ID 7518860.
  59. 59.
    Sheleme T, Jilo O, Bekele F, Olika W, Safera B, Babu Y. Uncontrolled blood pressure and contributing factors among patients with hypertension at outpatient care of Bedele General Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:20503121221126333.
  60. 60.
    Ndege BD, LO; Owiti, MOG; Anjichi, G; Siika, AM;. Prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension among type-2 diabetic patients at Moi Teaching and referral hospital, Eldoret, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2014;91(8):253–60.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    Rampamba EM, Meyer JC, Godman B, Kurdi A, Helberg E. Evaluation of antihypertensive adherence and its determinants at primary healthcare facilities in rural South Africa. J Comp Eff Res. 2018;7(7):661–72.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.
    Kabir MI, Z; Abubakar, IS; Jibril, M;. Compliance to medication among hypertensive patients in Murtala Mohammed Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. J Comm Med Prim Health Care. 2004;16(1):16-20.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.
    Chika AU, EU; Oricha, SB; Isezuo, SA;. Gender disparity in antihypertensive utilization and blood pressure control. Sahel Med J. 2009;12(4):155–8.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.
    Osamor PE, Owumi BE. Factors associated with treatment compliance in hypertension in southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29(6):619–28.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. 65.
    Tebelu DT, Tadesse TA, Getahun MS, Negussie YM, Gurara AM. Hypertension self-care practice and its associated factors in Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia: A multi-center cross-sectional study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023;16(1):20.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.
    Iloh GO, JN; Njoku, PU; Amadi, AN; Godswill-Uko, EU;. Medication adherence and blood pressure control amongst adults with primary hypertension attending a tertiary hospital primary care clinic in Eastern Nigeria. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2013;5(1):6p.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    Obirikorang Y, Obirikorang C, Acheampong E, Odame Anto E, Gyamfi D, Philip Segbefia S, et al. Predictors of Noncompliance to Antihypertensive Therapy among Hypertensive Patients Ghana: Application of Health Belief Model. Int J Hypertens. 2018;2018:4701097.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.
    Dedefo MG, Gemechu DB, Fekadu G, Tekle Dibessa T. Blood Pressure Control among Hypertensive Diabetic Patients on Follow-Up at Chronic Clinic of Nekemte Referral Hospital in West Ethiopia. Int J Hypertens. 2020;2020:7526257.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    Ohene Buabeng K, Matowe L, Plange-Rhule J. Unaffordable drug prices: the major cause of non-compliance with hypertension medication in Ghana. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2004;7(3):350–2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    Woode E, Boakye-Gyasi E, Obirikorang Y, Adu EA, Obirikorang C, Acheampong E, Odame-Anto E. Predictors of medication nonadherence among hypertensive clients in a Ghanaian population: Application of the Hill-Bone and Perceived Barriers to Treatment Compliance Scale. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(3):e584.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    Nakwafila O, Mashamba-Thompson T, Godi A, Sartorius B. A Cross-Sectional Study on Hypertension Medication Adherence in a High-Burden Region in Namibia: Exploring Hypertension Interventions and Validation of the Namibia Hill-Bone Compliance Scale. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7).
  72. 72.↵
    Mweene MB, J; Andrews, B; Mweene, MM; Lakhi, S;. Factors Associated With Poor Medication Adherence In Hypertensive Patients In Lusaka, Zambia. Med J Zambia. 2010;37(3):252–61.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.
    Goverwa TP, Masuka N, Tshimanga M, Gombe NT, Takundwa L, Bangure D, Wellington M. Uncontrolled hypertension among hypertensive patients on treatment in Lupane District, Zimbabwe, 2012. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:703.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.
    Solomon M, Negussie YM, Bekele NT, Getahun MS, Gurara AM. Uncontrolled blood pressure and associated factors in adult hypertensive patients undergoing follow-up at public health facility ambulatory clinics in Bishoftu town, Ethiopia: a multi-center study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):258.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.↵
    Nashilongo MM, Singu B, Kalemeera F, Mubita M, Naikaku E, Baker A, et al. Assessing Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in Primary Health Care in Namibia: Findings and Implications. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017;31(5-6):565–78.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.↵
    Abeasi DA, D; Akumiah, PO;. Predictors of Medication Adherence Among Adults With Hypertension in Ghana. J Client-Cent Nurs Care. 2022;8(1):23–32.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.
    Attahiru M, Simon PL, Mutalub YB, Akangoziri MD, Grema BA. Predictors of blood pressure control amongst primary care patients of a teaching hospital in Bauchi, North-Eastern Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2023;30(1):46–52.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.
    Onwukwe SC, Ngene NC. Blood pressure control in hypertensive patients attending a rural community health centre in Gauteng Province, South Africa: A cross-sectional study. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2022;64(1):e1-e9.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.
    Fekadu G, Adamu A, Gebre M, Gamachu B, Bekele F, Abadiga M, et al. Magnitude and Determinants of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Among Adult Hypertensive Patients on Follow-Up at Nekemte Referral Hospital, Western Ethiopia. Integr Blood Press Control. 2020;13:49–61.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    Achieng LJ, MD; Ogola, EN; Karari, E;. Adequacy of Blood Pressure Control and Level of Adherence with Antihypertensive Therapy. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(11):499–506.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    Pallangyo P, Komba M, Mkojera ZS, Kisenge PR, Bhalia S, Mayala H, et al. Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control Among Hypertensive Outpatients Attending a Tertiary Cardiovascular Hospital in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Integr Blood Press Control. 2022;15:97–112.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    Ikechukwu EO, UP; Ogochukwu, AM;. Predictors of self-reported adherence to antihypertensive medication in a Nigerian population. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2010;01(02):133–7.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.
    Olowookere AO, SA; Talabi, AO; Etonyeaku, AC; Adeleke, OE; Akinboboye, OO;. Perceived family support and factors influencing medication adherence among hypertensive patients attending a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Ann Trop Med Pub Health. 2015;8(6):241–5.
    OpenUrl
  84. 84.↵
    Odiase FO, JE;. Predictors of nonadherence to antihypertensive medications among stroke survivors in Benin City Nigeria. Sub-Saharan Afr J Med. 2019;6:122–8.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.
    Busari OO, T; Olufemi, O; Desalu, O; Opadijo, OG; Jimoh, AK; Agboola, SM; Busari, OE; Olalekan, O;. Impact of patients knowledge, attitude and practices on hypertension on compliance with antihypertensive drugs in a resource-poor setting. TAF Prev Med Bulletin. 2010;9(2):87–92.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.↵
    Josephs V. Compliance of Nigerians with drug treatment os systemic hypertension: is this just a literacy problem. J Med Biomed Res. 2013;12(1):8p.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.↵
    Hungerbuhler P, Bovet P, Shamlaye C, Burnand B, Waeber B. Compliance with medication among outpatients with uncontrolled hypertension in the Seychelles. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(4):437–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    Ambaw AD, Alemie GA, SM WY, Mengesha ZB. Adherence to antihypertensive treatment and associated factors among patients on follow up at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. 89.↵
    Tibebu A, Mengistu D, Bulto LN. Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive medications and associated factors for hypertensive patients attending chronic follow-up units of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017;11(4):47–52.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.↵
    Andualem A, Liknaw T, Edmealem A, Gedefaw M. Adherence to antihypertensive medications among adult hypertensive patients attending chronic follow-up units of Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(31):e26818.
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.↵
    Bamidele ES, K; Adefala, N; Osinaike, A; Omotosho, A;. Drug adherence among adult hypertensives attending medical out-patient clinic in a tertiary hospital in Ogun State, Nigeria. Babcock Uni Med J. 2020;3(1):37–44.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.↵
    Mebrahtu G, M MM, Okoth Achila O, Seyoum Y, Adnoy ET, Ovberedjo M. Antihypertensive Medication Adherence and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patients Attending a National Referral Hospital in Asmara, Eritrea. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:2619–32.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    Kretchy IA, Boima V, Agyabeng K, Koduah A, Appiah B. Psycho-behavioural factors associated with medication adherence among male out-patients with hypertension in a Ghanaian hospital. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227874.
    OpenUrl
  94. 94.↵
    Teshome DF, Bekele KB, Habitu YA, Gelagay AA. Medication adherence and its associated factors among hypertensive patients attending the Debre Tabor General Hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Integr Blood Press Control. 2017;10:1–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    Abdisa L, Alemu A, Heluf H, Sertsu A, Dessie Y, Negash B, et al. Factors associated with poor medication adherence during COVID-19 pandemic among hypertensive patients visiting public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e064284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. 96.↵
    Lulebo AM, Mutombo PB, Mapatano MA, Mafuta EM, Kayembe PK, Ntumba LT, et al. Predictors of non-adherence to antihypertensive medication in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:526.
  97. 97.↵
    Ikama MS, Nsitou BM, Loumouamou M, Kimbally-Kaky G, Nkoua JL. [Drug compliance and its factors in a group of hypertensive Congolese]. Pan Afr Med J. 2013;15:121.
  98. 98.↵
    Baah-Nyarkoh E, Alhassan Y, Dwomoh AK, Kretchy IA. Medicated-related burden and adherence in patients with co-morbid type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15448.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.↵
    Chang TE, Ritchey MD, Park S, Chang A, Odom EC, Durthaler J, et al. National Rates of Nonadherence to Antihypertensive Medications Among Insured Adults With Hypertension, 2015. Hypertension. 2019;74(6):1324–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    Náfrádi L, Galimberti E, Nakamoto K, Schulz PJ. Intentional and Unintentional Medication Non-Adherence in Hypertension: The Role of Health Literacy, Empowerment and Medication Beliefs. J Public Health Res. 2016;5(3):762.
    OpenUrl
  101. 101.↵
    Kwan YH, Weng SD, Loh DHF, Phang JK, Oo LJY, Blalock DV, et al. Measurement Properties of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Medication Adherence: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e19179.
    OpenUrl
  102. 102.↵
    Lam WY, Fresco P. Medication Adherence Measures: An Overview. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:217047.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.↵
    Kvarnström K, Westerholm A, Airaksinen M, Liira H. Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence in Patients with a Chronic Condition: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(7).
  104. 104.↵
    Lambert-Kerzner A, Havranek EP, Plomondon ME, Fagan KM, McCreight MS, Fehling KB, et al. Perspectives of patients on factors relating to adherence to post-acute coronary syndrome medical regimens. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1053–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    Allaham KK, Feyasa MB, Govender RD, Musa AMA, AlKaabi AJ, ElBarazi I, et al. Medication Adherence Among Patients with Multimorbidity in the United Arab Emirates. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:1187–200.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.↵
    Drzayich Antol D, Waldman Casebeer A, Khoury R, Michael T, Renda A, Hopson S, et al. The relationship between comorbidity medication adherence and health related quality of life among patients with cancer. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2:29.
  107. 107.↵
    Odipo E, Jarhyan P, Nzinga J, Prabhakaran D, Aryal A, Clarke-Deelder E, et al. The path to universal health coverage in five African and Asian countries: examining the association between insurance status and health-care use. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(1):e123–e33.
    OpenUrl
  108. 108.↵
    Parati G, Kjeldsen S, Coca A, Cushman WC, Wang J. Adherence to Single-Pill Versus Free-Equivalent Combination Therapy in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2021;77(2):692–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. 109.
    Weisser B, Predel HG, Gillessen A, Hacke C, Vor dem Esche J, Rippin G, et al. Single Pill Regimen Leads to Better Adherence and Clinical Outcome in Daily Practice in Patients Suffering from Hypertension and/or Dyslipidemia: Results of a Meta-Analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020;27(2):157–64.
    OpenUrl
  110. 110.↵
    Kengne AP, Brière JB, Le Nouveau P, Kodjamanova P, Atanasov P, Kochoedo M, et al. Impact of single-pill combinations versus free-equivalent combinations on adherence and persistence in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023:1–11.
  111. 111.↵
    Stanley A. African Century IMF: International Monetary Fund; 2023 [cited 2024 3 May]. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/09/PT-african-century.
  112. 112.↵
    Dzudie A, Rayner B, Ojji D, Schutte AE, Twagirumukiza M, Damasceno A, et al. Roadmap to achieve 25% hypertension control in Africa by 2025. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2017;28(4):262–72.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  113. 113.↵
    Benjamin IJ, Kreutz R, Olsen MH, Schutte AE, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Frieden TR, et al. Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medications. Lancet. 2019;394(10199):637–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  114. 114.↵
    Zueger T, Gloor M, Lehmann V, Melmer A, Kraus M, Feuerriegel S, et al. White coat adherence effect on glucose control in adult individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;168:108392.
    OpenUrl
  115. 115.↵
    Poleon S, Sabbagh N, Racette L. Whitecoat Adherence in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:867884.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted May 29, 2024.
Download PDF
Email
High burden of non-adherence to blood pressure-lowering medications: meta-analysis of data from over 34,000 adults with hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa
Leopold Ndemnge Aminde, Valirie Ndip Agbor, Noah Takah Fongwen, Calypse Ngwasiri, Clovis Nkoke, Miriam Nji, Anastase Dzudie, Aletta E. Schutte
medRxiv 2024.05.28.24308082; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.28.24308082
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area