Protocol for the Enhanced Management of Multimorbid Patients with Chronic Pulmonary Diseases: Role of Indoor Air Quality

Alba Gómez-López, Ebymar Arismendi, Isaac Cano, Ramón Farré, María Fígols, Carme Hernández, Antonio Montilla-Ibarra, Núria Sánchez-Ruano, Benigno Sánchez, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Marta Sorribes, Emili Vela, Jordi Piera-Jiménez, Jaume Benavent, Jose Fermoso, Josep Roca, Rubèn González-Colom
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.24307036

ABSTRACT

Introduction Reducing unplanned hospital admissions in chronic patients at risk is a key area for action due to the high healthcare and societal burden of the phenomenon. The inconclusive results of preventive strategies in patients with chronic respiratory disorders and comorbidities are explainable by multifactorial but actionable factors.

The current protocol (January 2024 to December 2025) relies on the hypothesis that intertwined actions in four dimensions: i) management change, ii) personalisation of the interventions based on early detection/treatment of acute episodes and enhanced management of comorbidities, iii) mature digital support, and iv) comprehensive assessment, can effectively overcome most of the limitations shown by previous preventive strategies. Accordingly, the main objective is to implement a novel integrated care preventive service for enhanced management of these patients, as well as to evaluate its potential for value generation.

Methods and analysis At the end of 2024, the specifics of the novel service will be defined through the articulation of its four main components: i) Enhanced lung function testing through oscillometry, ii) Continuous monitoring of indoor air quality as a potential triggering factor, iii) Digital support with an adaptive case management approach, and iv) Predictive modelling for early identification and management of exacerbations. During 2025, the novel service will be assessed using a Quintuple Aim approach. Moreover, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will be applied to assess the implementation. The service components will be articulated through four sequential six-months Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Each cycle involves a targeted co-creation process following a mixed-methods approach with the active participation of patients, health professionals, managers, and digital experts.

Ethics and dissemination The Ethics Committee for Human Research at Hospital Clinic de Barcelona approved the protocol on June 29, 2023 (HCB/2023/0126). Before any procedure, all patients in the study must sign an informed consent form.

Registration NCT06421402.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

  • The articulation of the four service components, identified in a previous co-creation process, ensures a comprehensive approach to the novel integrated care service.

  • Innovative features of the digital support to the service provided by the Health Circuit platform, based on an Adaptive Case Management orientation, should contribute to overcoming current limitations in digital health transformation.

  • Using a Plan-Do-Study-Act strategy, with targeted objectives for each co-creation cycle, will ensure the maturity of the service design and evaluation processes throughout the protocol’s execution.

  • The comprehensive evaluation of the novel service, including a Quintuple Aim approach and assessment of the deployment process using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, will contribute to overcoming the efficacy-effectiveness gap seen in this type of integrated care service.

  • A potential constraint is that only some patients within the cohort may qualify as future candidates for the innovative service in an actual working environment. Nonetheless, the established protocol is designed to effectively discern and identify the specific patient profiles who stand to derive notable benefits from these interventions.

1. INTRODUCTION

Unplanned hospital admissions in multimorbid patients with a high risk of acute events generate significant healthcare and societal dysfunctions, as well as high financial burden1,2. Early treatment of exacerbations and enhanced management of comorbidities3,4 are the two major actionable factors to avoid unplanned hospital admissions. However, the value generation of preventive strategies in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and comorbidities is inconclusive5,6. Such lack of results can be attributed to several factors, namely: heterogeneities of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)7, dominant role of co-morbid conditions in the acute episodes8, unawareness of potentially relevant triggering factors9–11, diversity of the interventions and/or suboptimal description of the protocols leading to poor comparability12,13, among other aspects. Overall, there is a clear consensus on the need to explore the potential of clinical processes to efficiently prevent unplanned hospital admissions within an integrated care approach14,15 in chronic respiratory patients with multimorbidity.

To this end, a recent co-creation process16 was undertaken as part of a large international project17 to scale up integrated care services across twenty-one European Union (EU) countries/regions. This process delved into the challenge of preventing unplanned hospital admissions in high-risk candidates with multimorbidity, in whom the severity of the primary disease exerts significant influence18. Key lessons learned were the need for specific actions on four dimensions to achieve: i) early identification of the acute episodes and adjustment of organisational aspects of management, ii) personalisation of interventions, iii) mature digital support to the clinical services, and iv) enhanced applicability of the assessment of the service deployment in real-world scenarios.

The current protocol, emerging from the co-creation process, will be executed over two years (from January 2024 to December 2025) to explore the hypothesis that intertwined actions in the above mentioned four dimensions can effectively overcome most of the limitations shown by previous strategies aiming at preventing unplanned hospital admissions in chronic respiratory patients with a high risk of severe acute events. Accordingly, the study’s main objective is to implement a novel integrated care preventive service for enhanced management of these patients and to evaluate its potential for value generation in a real-world scenario.

At the end of the first year (2024), the aim is to define the specifics of the novel service through the articulation of its four main components: i) Enhanced lung function testing through oscillometry19, ii) Continuous monitoring of indoor air quality (IAQ) as potential triggering factor9–11, iii) Digital support with an adaptive case management approach20, and iv) Predictive modelling for early identification and management of exacerbations.

During the second year (2025), the protocol aims to assess the novel service using a Quintuple Aim21 approach. It will evaluate the implementation process using a highly applicable version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)22. The latter seeks to identify facilitators/barriers to successful service transferability to other sites.

In summary, the current study aims to explore the potential for value generation of the approach to be further scaled up in real-world settings. The novel service, tested in the protocol, will be addressed to community-based chronic patients showing a high risk of hospital admissions, as well as to target patients during transitional care after hospital discharge.

1.1 The context

The protocol has been built up under the umbrella of the EU project “Knowledge for improving indoor AIR quality and HEALTH” (K-HEALTHinAIR, 2022-2026)23. The primary goal of this EU project is to enhance understanding regarding the impact of chemical and biological IAQ on human health. Moreover, it aims to devise cost-effective methods for more precise monitoring and improvement of IAQ. This will be achieved by analysing data gathered from ten real-life scenarios across Europe, emphasising public health surveillance, and focusing mainly on vulnerable demographics such as high-risk patients, older adults, and children. A detailed description of the K-HEALTHinAIR can be found in the Supplementary Material – Appendix 1.

Within this framework, the research team at the Integrated Health District of Barcelona-Esquerra24 (AISBE) is conducting a follow-up study of a cohort of multimorbid patients with obstructive lung disorders to assess the relationships between IAQ and health status. This unique setup provides an optimal environment for testing and refining integrated care preventive interventions to reduce unplanned hospitalisations.

2. METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Figure 1 depicts the general structure of the current protocol. It is conceived as a two-phase prospective follow-up of 200 outpatients from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2025.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Study protocol flowchart.

The four main components of the service are designed and assessed at the end of the first year. The second year, 2025, addresses evaluating the novel service following a Quintuple Aim21 approach and assessing the implementation process using the Comprehensive Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)22. Throughout the protocol, four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)25 co-creation cycles, six months duration each, will be conducted with the participation of patients, health professionals, managers, and digital experts. See text for detailed descriptions. IAQ and OAQ stand for Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality respectively; AI stands for Artificial Intelligence.

Phase I of the protocol, running during the entire 2024, has been designed to consolidate the characteristics of the novel service at the end of the first year, including the articulated execution of its four main components. Likewise, the main objective of Phase II, running during the entire 2025, is threefold: i) Assessment of the service outcomes, ii) Identification of the profiles of patients’ candidates for preventive interventions, and iii) Evaluation of the implementation process.

The articulation of the different service components defined in the protocol will be achieved through four sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles25 of six months duration each (Figure 1), following the protocol used in17. Each PDSA cycle involves a targeted co-creation process following a mixed-methods approach, including quantitative and qualitative methodologies, with the active participation of patients, health professionals, managers, and digital experts.

The expected achievements at the end of the PDSA cycles are as follows: i) PDSA-1: Selection of clinically applicable patients’ data capture for the different dimensions depicted in Table 1; ii) PDSA-2: Completion of the design of the novel service; iii) PDSA-3: First assessment of the predictive modelling for early detection of exacerbations facilitating AI supported management of the patients; and iv) PDSA-4: Comprehensive assessment of the novel service. The details of the PDSA method, the templates used to monitor each part of the cycle, and the “Plan” for the initial cycle can be found in Supplementary Material – Appendix 3.

View this table:
Table 1 Main data domains considered in the baseline assessment and during the two-year follow-up of the cohort (n=200)

Patients’ enrolment, from November 2023 to the end of June 2024: The recruitment efforts for 80% of the study group spanned four primary care facilities from AISBE, each with a catchment population of approximately 20k citizens. The first step was elaborating the dataset of potential candidates using registry information from the Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS)26, allowing the identification of the corresponding primary care physicians.

The primary care physicians’ engagement in the study facilitated contact with the patients, exploring their willingness to participate and keeping them within their healthcare team during the follow-up period. An initial phone visit of the nurse case manager, on behalf of the primary care team, is used to introduce the project and set the first face-to-face visit at the patient’s home.

The remaining 20% of the cohort includes patients with severe asthma (GINA27,28 step 5) recruited from the outpatient of Severe Asthma Unit of the Pulmonology Department of Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (HCB) following similar steps.

Inclusion criteria: i) adults <85 years, ii) diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary conditions (i.e. COPD or severe asthma), iii) showing a high burden of comorbidities, above percentile 80 of the regional risk stratification pyramid, assessed by Adjusted Morbidity Groups (AMG) scoring29,30, and iv) living in AISBE, except for patients with asthma resistant to standard therapy that due to the scarcity of cases the catching area has been extended to any the entire city of Barcelona.

The AMG is a morbidity grouper designed to capture patients’ disease burden by considering the quantity and complexity of concurrent conditions. It utilises disease-specific weights derived from statistical analyses incorporating mortality rates and healthcare resource utilisation.

Exclusion criteria: i) patients with dementia or unable for independent daily life activities.

Data acquisition: Table 1 indicates the data collection strategy considered in the current study. The top section, titled “K-Health in Air project”, describes the categories of information collected as background data within the EU project. In contrast, the bottom part, named “Enhanced patient management”, indicates the data categories considered for characterisation and early detection of exacerbations in these patients.

The baseline evaluation and follow-up of the participants includes an assessment of their digital literacy such that the study protocol considers the following three modalities of patients’ participation in terms of technological support, namely: i) phone-based only, ii) phone-based and passive use of the Beat One watch sensor44, and iii) digital support for patients and health professionals provided by the Health Circuit platform20. Each category involves a different interaction modality with the nurse case manager45,46, who will interface between the patient and the corresponding primary care physician (for all patients) and/or specialist (only for severe asthma patients), as delineated in Figure 2.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Enhanced patient management scheme.

Patients participating in the digitally enabled follow-up will be overseen by a nurse case manager utilising the Health Circuit solution. The Health Circuit patient app offers a trimodal approach to data acquisition: i) Biological data collection throughout the Beat One watch; ii) a chat channel for direct communication with the nurse case manager; and iii) regular administration of health questionnaires to monitor disease status. Collected data through the Health Circuit app will be integrated into the study databases for comprehensive data analytics and predictive modelling. The Health Circuit professionals’ platform, controlled by the nurse case manager, provides enhanced patient management solutions. ML stands for Machine Learning, ACM for Adaptive Case Management and KPI for Key performance indicator.

Briefly, after the baseline assessment, the nurse case manager will undertake a motivational interview with the patient with a twofold purpose. Firstly, it will empower them with self-management strategies. Secondly, it will help them agree on the specificities of a personalised work plan that involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological actions. This health plan will be individually formulated with the patient, the case manager nurse, and the designated physician, whether the primary care physician or a specialised clinician. Such consensus action plan will be video recorded and used during the follow-up for subsequent interactions between the nurse case manager and the patient, utilising the Health Circuit mobile application as a supporting tool.

As depicted in Figure 2, the Health Circuit backend provides the case manager nurse with a dashboard for cohort monitoring and adherence to the agreed health plan, facilitating cohort tracking. The Health Circuit platform enables physiological data collection by synchronising with the Beat One watch and facilitates the periodic administration of health questionnaires for disease monitoring. Additionally, it offers a chat channel for direct communication with the patient. This is accompanied by a standardised cribbage scheme in the form of a decision tree to report health incidents, aiming to detect and intervene early in exacerbation episodes. In the event of reported incidents, the case manager nurse will contact the reference physician to define the course of action and treatment plan. The Supplementary Material – Appendix 2 describes the specifics of the protocols guiding the interactions between patients and the nurse case manager.

2.1 Integrated Care Service Components

As depicted in Figure 1, the development of the current protocol includes achievements in the four main service components executed during 2024; that is: i) Enhanced Lung Function Testing, ii) Continuous monitoring of IAQ, iii) Digital support with an Adaptive Case Management approach, and iv) Predictive modelling for enhanced management of exacerbations. Each component has specificities in design, setup, data analysis, and expected results, described below.

2.1.1. ENHANCED LUNG FUNCTION ASSESSMENT

Background and rationale

Using oscillometry to measure the respiratory system resistance and reactance shows a long track of physiological research from its introduction 70 years ago19. However, the interest in its clinical application, which is not invasive and does not require active patient cooperation, has steadily grown over the last decade. The 2020 update of the technical standards developed by a European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force of international experts47 and recent publications in the field48–50 indicate a high potential of the technique in lung function testing. The need for further information on the relationships between oscillometry variables, namely resistance and reactance, and clinical disorders has been acknowledged49. Also, better identification of complementarities between this technique and conventional forced spirometry (FS) testing is required. All in all, the establishment of the role of oscillometry in managing respiratory patients, either within the healthcare system, primary and specialised care, or at home through patients’ self-administration of the technique48–50, is a partially unmet need.

The current service component has two objectives. First, it investigates the role of oscillometry compared with FS testing in the entire cohort of 200 patients. Second, it explores the usefulness of home-based self-administered oscillometry in the early identification of clinical exacerbations, thus facilitating the early management of acute events.

Setup

All cohort participants (n=200) will undertake lung function measurements, oscillometry and FS at baseline and every six months during a two-year follow-up. Therefore, up to five lung function testing measurements will be done in each patient.

A second analysis will include only those individuals in whom the nurse case manager identifies suspicion of an early acute episode through the communication channel or the input data from the patient’s App, as defined during the first PDSA cycle. In such individuals, home-based equipment for self-monitoring oscillometry and short questionnaires to be answered through the App will be provided for daily assessment during a two-week period51. The information collected will be used to guide the management of the acute episode. Home visits of health professionals can be scheduled as needed.

Oscillometry and FS measurements will be performed using an Ambulatory Lung Diagnosis System (ALDS) from Lothar Medtech52 compliant with ERS technical standards.

Data analysis and expected outcomes

The relationships among oscillometry variables, FS testing and clinical symptoms, patients’ traits, and sensor data (i.e., heart rate variability, HRV), indicated in Table 1, will be explored.

The primary expected outcomes of this component are that while FS is valid for the characterisation of the patients in terms of diagnosis and disease severity, the results of oscillometry may offer clear advantages for patients’ monitoring in terms of i) logistics of the testing, ii) patient’s tolerance, iii) reliability of the results in non-specialized settings, and, likely, iv) information content. We also hypothesise that the combination of oscillometry, the patient’s reported data, and sensor information will allow us to characterise and support the early management of exacerbation episodes.

2.1.2. CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY (IAQ)

Background and rationale

Understanding the complex links between IAQ and acute health issues in respiratory outpatients remains an unmet need9–11. A comprehensive, long-term monitoring cohort holds promise in addressing the hypotheses surrounding IAQ’s impact on respiratory health. It is recognised that poor IAQ in homes may contribute to worsening respiratory symptoms in high-risk outpatients, potentially leading to diminished lung function, impaired quality of life, increased healthcare visits, and even mortality. This hypothesis underscores the potential of specific indoor pollutants and allergens to induce respiratory inflammation, hinder lung function, and alter heart rate variability, necessitating a focused exploration of these pollutants’ physiological effects on respiratory patients within their homes. Characterising IAQ at patients’ residences is, therefore, pivotal in unravelling the mechanisms triggering exacerbations, offering critical insights for tailored interventions aimed at alleviating respiratory issues and enhancing the well-being of these patients.

Setup

Exploring the relationship between IAQ and health status encompasses two primary domains: IAQ information and health-related data. The MICA-INBIOT36 sensors will be installed at patients’ homes to capture IAQ information, utilising one desktop device per residence. Interconnected via Wi-Fi, these sensors will continuously and autonomously monitor specific IAQ parameters detailed in Table 1.

Simultaneously, health-related data will be gathered from diverse sources (Table 1): i) Standardized periodic questionnaires covering various dimensions, ii) Patient-generated data through the Health Circuit app (encompassing self-tracked incidences, nurse case manager interactions, Likert scale-based questionnaires), iii) Physiological signals and physical activity via a wrist sensor, and iv) Clinical information encompassing lung function measurements, and registry data sourced from the CHSS. This comprehensive approach holistically allows to capture IAQ dynamics and multifaceted health-related information to elucidate the nuanced relationship between indoor air quality and respiratory patient well-being.

Data analysis and expected outcomes

The data analysis will encompass descriptive statistics, correlation, and time series analyses to extract meaningful insights. Descriptive statistics will summarise and present the IAQ parameters monitored by the MICA-INBIOT sensors, providing a clear overview of the indoor air quality profiles across households. Correlation analyses will be instrumental in examining relationships between IAQ parameters and health-related data sources, unveiling potential associations between specific determinants and various health outcomes experienced by respiratory patients. Additionally, time series analyses will offer a dynamic perspective, exploring how IAQ parameters fluctuate over time and their potential impact on acute health issues among respiratory outpatients. Examining trends and patterns in IAQ variations alongside health-related events or exacerbations can reveal potential triggers or associations between changes in indoor air quality and respiratory health outcomes.

2.1.3. DIGITAL SUPPORT WITH AN ADAPTIVE CASE MANAGEMENT (ACM) APPROACH

Background and rationale

The pilot study20 on community-based management of complex chronic patients with high risk for hospitalisation showed the potential of the ACM approach to enhance the management of unplanned health events. This would lead to less use of health care resources and improved patient empowerment for self-management and perception of continuity of care53,54.

The current study has a twofold aim. The first two PDSA cycles will contribute to refining the digital tool’s current functionalities, as shown in Figure 2 and 20. Secondly, it will evaluate the potential of a set of short questions answered using a Likert scale, to capture patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and patient-reported experiences (PREMs).

Setup

The analysis of professionals’ (n=20) and patients’ (n=200) usability and acceptability of the digital support (Health Circuit) will be done with the self-administered net promoter score (NPS)55, the System Usability Scale (SUS)56 and the Nijmegen Continuity questionnaires57, respectively. Lastly, an evaluation of the set of short questions, aiming at capturing PROMs and PREMs, will be conducted by comparing the Likert scoring with the results of the corresponding standardised questionnaires, as reported in Table 1. Detailed features of the assessments will be defined during the first PDSA cycle.

Data analysis and expected outcomes

At the end of the first year, a refined version of Health Circuit properly customized to address the objectives of 2025 is expected to be generated. The corresponding questionnaires will substantiate the usability and acceptability of digital support for patients and health professionals. Finally, validating the set of short questionnaires for capturing PROMs and PREMs should contribute to evaluating the service during Phase II.

2.1.4. PREDICTIVE MODELLING FOR ENHANCED MANAGEMENT OF EXACERBATIONS

Background and rationale

The negative impact of exacerbations on quality of life, resource use, disease progression and prognosis has been well documented12,13. However, early detection and personalized treatment considering pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to effectively prevent emergency room consultations and unplanned hospital admissions is still an unsolved challenge. This is partly due to current post-hoc definitions of exacerbation relying broadly on symptomatic changes. However, this is also explained by inherent heterogeneities in patients’ underlying conditions due to comorbidities.

The innovative study framework proposed herein presents a pioneering approach to this challenge: using machine learning to detect exacerbations early58. Leveraging Health Circuit’s patient management paradigm alongside comprehensive patient health assessment holds promise in accurately discerning and characterising exacerbation events.

Setup

The nurse case manager will document all instances indicating suspicion of an exacerbation episode detected through the patient’s App input, as well as exacerbation episodes resulting in primary care visits, emergency room visits, or hospitalizations.

Data analysis and expected outcomes

Upon concluding Phase I, an analysis of the time-series data encompassing physiological signals, air quality metrics, lung function, patients’ disease perception, and underlying comorbidity will be conducted to characterise these exacerbation occurrences thoroughly. Moreover, diverse modelling strategies to predict exacerbation events will be generated, tested, and compared. The model exhibiting superior performance will be prospectively validated during Phase II. Predictions will not be used for clinical intervention. In addition, explainable AI methods will be employed to assess the model’s covariates (i.e. the mean decrease in accuracy method59), determining their predictive efficacy and isolating the critical signals instrumental in early identifying exacerbations (i.e. Anchor method60).

By harnessing advanced technological tools and conducting data analyses, this study aims to yield several pivotal outcomes. Initially, the thorough documentation and comprehensive assessment of both suspected and documented exacerbation episodes, alongside a multifaceted evaluation of patient health parameters, seek to refine the precision and accuracy in identifying and characterising exacerbations. We aim to unravel profound insights into exacerbation patterns through an exhaustive analysis of temporal data spanning physiological indicators, air quality metrics, patients’ perceptions of their illness, and comorbidity profiles. This approach is anticipated to expedite early intervention strategies and enable the implementation of more targeted preventive approaches.

Lastly, exploring and comparing diverse predictive modelling methodologies aims to construct robust predictive models for forecasting exacerbation events, catalysing the development of clinical applications and offering decision support tools to aid healthcare providers in efficiently anticipating and managing exacerbations.

2.2 Assessment of the Novel Integrated Care Service

As depicted in Figure 1, the achievements in the four main service components executed during 2024 will conform to the final features of the novel integrated care service to be assessed during 2025 concerning the potential for value generation, aiming at preventing unplanned hospital admissions. Moreover, the research will identify key elements ensuring sustainable adoption of the service in a real-world environment and facilitating site transferability of the intervention.

Background and rationale

The progress experienced in terms of adoption of integrated care services at the regional level over the last decade14,61,62, as well as key lessons learned in recent studies done in AISBE24, suggest a high potential to overcome the efficacy-effectiveness gap seen in previous local analyses carried out addressing the prevention of unplanned hospital admissions63,64. Moreover, the current research’s two-phase study design ensures our approach’s maturity.

The main objective of the second year is to perform a Quintuple Aim evaluation of the community-based service to prevent unplanned hospital admissions. Also, to assess the process of implementation of the service.

Setup

The consolidated version of the service for managing the patients’ cohort (n=200) at the end of Phase I (Figure 1) will be deployed and evaluated over a year in 2025. Health outcomes and patients’ expenditures in the study cohort will be compared with a control group under conventional care selected from the same primary care units.

The control group will comprise AISBE patients with chronic pulmonary diseases during the same timeframe. To establish comparability, study participants will undergo a 1:1 pairing with control outpatients using propensity score matching 65,66 and genetic-matching techniques67. Two sets of variables will be considered for this matching process to ensure patient comparability. These variables will encompass primary pulmonary diagnoses (e.g., COPD, Asthma, etc.) and baseline characteristics, incorporating factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, number of admissions in the preceding year, healthcare costs within the healthcare system during the prior year, and the comorbidity burden assessed by the AMG index.

Data analysis and expected outcomes

The Quintuple Aim assessment will include: i) Health outcomes such as number of acute episodes, emergency room consultations, hospital admissions, and mortality, ii) PROMs and PREMs, iii) health professionals’ experience, and iv) direct costs evaluated with a cost consequence analysis. It is worth noting that items involving indirect costs will be identified to assess potential sources of inequity.

The CHSS database will be consulted to compare clinical outcomes between the study participants and a control group. This comprehensive analysis will encompass i) mortality rates; ii) healthcare professional encounters, including primary care visits, specialised outpatient visits, ambulatory mental health centre visits, emergency room visits, planned and unplanned hospital admissions, and admissions to mental health centres; as well as iii) total healthcare expenditure. The latter includes direct healthcare delivery costs, pharmaceutical expenses, and other billable healthcare costs like non-urgent medical transportation, ambulatory rehabilitation, domiciliary oxygen therapy, and dialysis.

The comprehensive assessment planned in the current study should allow the identification of the profile of candidates for the novel service and provide valuable information on its potential for value generation. Moreover, the protocol will evaluate the service adoption process using a simplified CFIR22 approach to identify key barriers and facilitators that may guide site transferability. The evaluation of the main items of the CFIR will be quantitatively expressed using Lickert scales. Finally, a profiled dashboard for quality assurance of the service after adoption will be proposed.

3. ETHICAL AND REGULATORY ISSUES

The Ethical Committee for Human Research at Hospital Clinic de Barcelona approved the core study protocol of K-Health in Air on June 29, 2023 (HCB/2023/0126). The study design adheres to data minimisation principles, ensuring that only essential data are collected and utilised. The study will be conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration (Stronghold Version, Brazil, October 2013) and in accordance with the protocol and the relevant legal requirements (Biomedical Research Act 14/2007 of July 3).

All patients in the study must sign an informed consent form before any procedure. The participants can withdraw their consent at any time without altering their relationship with their doctor or harming their treatment.

The One Beat watch does not hold medical device certification and will be utilized solely for data collection and exploring potential patterns informing exacerbations, not for decision-making within the study. Any future application derived from this research must ensure that the technology aligns with medical device regulations.

Data Availability

Data availability does not apply to this article since it describes a protocol rather than presenting study results

Authors’ Contributions

JR and RGC designed the study and are responsible for overseeing project coordination. JPJ and JF contributed valuable insights into the study design. JR and RF will spearhead the development of the enhanced lung function assessment study. IC, CH, and AGL will take the lead in designing the study on digital support through an adaptive case management approach. RGC and IC will also head the development of predictive modelling for improved management of exacerbations.

MF will provide the MICA sensors on behalf of INBIOT and will offer expertise in IAQ/OAQ assessment jointly with BS. EV will manage the extraction of pertinent data from the CHSS database and provide statistical support.

AGL will fulfil the responsibilities of the nurse case manager as outlined in the protocol, which includes overseeing cohort recruitment and follow-up. The clinical intervention and patient follow-up plans will be collaboratively determined by AGL, EA, NS, MS, ASA, JB, AMI and JR.

AGL, JR, and RGC initially drafted the manuscript, which included writing the text and creating infographics. It was then thoroughly reviewed by IC and CH. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and are committed to upholding the integrity and accuracy of the work.

Funding

The K-HEALTHinAIR project funded this study, Grant Agreement n° 101057693, under a European Union’s Call on Environment and Health (HORIZON-HLTH-2021-ENVHLTH-02).

Disclaimer

Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency as granting authority. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible.

Competing Interests

IC and JR hold shares of Health Circuit. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acronyms

AISBE
Integrated Health District of Barcelona-Esquerra
ACT
Asthma Control Test
AQLQ
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
ALDS
Ambulatory Lung Diagnosis System
AMG
Adjusted Morbidity Groups
CAT
COPD Assessment test
CFIR
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
COPD
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
FS
Forced Spirometry
HCB
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
HRV
Heart Rate Variability
ICHOM
International Consortium for Health Outcomes Management
IAQ
Indoor Air Quality
K-HEALTHinAIR
EU Project “Knowledge for improving indoor AIR quality and HEALTH”
mMRC
modified Medical Research Council
NPS
Net Promoter Score
PaRIS
Patient-Reported Indicator Survey
PM
Particulate Matter
PROMIS
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
PROMs
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
PDSA
Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle
PREMs
Patient-Reported Experience Measures
PS
Propensity Score Matching
SUS
System Usability Scale
SNOT
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test
TAI
Test of Adherence to Inhalers
VOC
Volatile Organic Compound
WHO
World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. Published 2016. Accessed January 4, 2024. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/174536/1/9789241564977_eng.pdf?ua=1,
  2. 2.↵
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Health at a Glance 2019. OECD; 2019. doi:10.1787/4dd50c09-en
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Academy of Medical Sciences. Multimorbidity: a priority for global health research. Academy of Medical Sciences. Published 2018. https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/82222577
  4. 4.↵
    Generalitat de Catalunya Departament de Salut. Catalan model of care for people with frailty, complex chronic (CCP) and advanced chronic (ACP) conditions. Published 2021. Accessed January 4, 2024. https://scientiasalut.gencat.cat/bitstream/handle/11351/7007/bases_conceptuals_model_atencio_persones_fragils_cronicitat_complexa_avancada_2020_ang.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y
  5. 5.↵
    Shepperd S et al. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;(1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000313.PUB3/MEDIA/CDSR/CD000313/REL0003/CD000313/IMAGE_N/NCD000313-CMP-015-01.PNG
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Facchinetti G et al. Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of older people with chronic diseases: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;101:103396. doi:10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2019.103396
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Bhatt SP, et al. Phenotypes, Etiotypes, and Endotypes of Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;208(10):1026–1041. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202209-1748SO
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Vela E et al. Population-based analysis of patients with COPD in Catalonia: a cohort study with implications for clinical management. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e017283. doi:10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-017283
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Amrol DJ. How Does Indoor Air Quality Affect COPD? NEJM Journal Watch. 2022;2022. doi:10.1056/NEJM-JW.NA54672
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.
    Putcha N et al. Home Dust Allergen Exposure Is Associated with Outcomes among Sensitized Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(4):412–420. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202103-0583OC/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Hansel NN et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Air Cleaners to Improve Indoor Air Quality and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Health Results of the CLEAN AIR Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(4):421–430. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202103-0604OC/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    Mannino DM. Is One Exacerbation Enough to Modify Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;208(2):124–125. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202304-0783ED/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Celli BR et al. An updated definition and severity classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: The rome proposal. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;204(11):1251–1258. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202108-1819PP/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Herranz C. An Adaptive Case Management Approach to Prevent Unplanned Hospital Admissions in a Care Continuum Scenario. Published online 2023.
  15. 15.↵
    Cano I et al. An adaptive case management system to support integrated care services : Lessons learned from the NEXES project. J Biomed Inform. 2015;55:11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Herranz C et al. A Co-Creation Process Toward Sustainable Adoption of Integrated Care for Prevention of Unplanned Hospitalizations. medRxiv. Published online January 1, 2023:2023.08.03.23293537. doi:10.1101/2023.08.03.23293537
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Jadecare (2020-2023). Joint Action on implementation of digitally enabled integrated person-centred care. Published 2020. https://www.jadecare.eu/
  18. 18.↵
    González-Colom R et al. Computational modelling for prevention of unplanned hospital admissions in multimorbid patients. J Med Internet Res. Published online 2023. doi:10.2196/40846
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Dubois AB et al. Oscillation Mechanics of Lungs and Chest in Man. https://doi.org/101152/jappl195686587. 1956;8(6):587–594. doi:10.1152/JAPPL.1956.8.6.587
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Herranz C et al. A Practice-Proven Adaptive Case Management Approach for Innovative Health Care Services (Health Circuit): Cluster Randomized Clinical Pilot and Descriptive Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e47672. doi:10.2196/47672
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Nundy S et al. The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity. JAMA. 2022;327(6):521–522. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.25181
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Keith RE et al. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1). doi:10.1186/S13012-017-0550-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    K-Health in Air (2022 - 2026). Knowledge for Improving Indoor Air Quality and Health (K-Health in Air). Published 2022. https://k-healthinair.eu/
  24. 24.↵
    Font D et al. Integrated Health Care Barcelona Esquerra (Ais-Be): A Global View of Organisational Development, Re-Engineering of Processes and Improvement of the Information Systems. The Role of the Tertiary University Hospital in the Transformation. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(2). doi:10.5334/IJIC.2476
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Christoff P. Running PDSA cycles. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2018;48(8):198–201. doi:10.1016/J.CPPEDS.2018.08.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Farré N et al. Medical resource use and expenditure in patients with chronic heart failure: a population-based analysis of 88 195 patients. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(9):1132–1140. doi:10.1002/ejhf.549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Venkatesan P. 2023 GINA report for asthma. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(7):589. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00230-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    Plaza Moral V et al. GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma. Open respiratory archives. 2023;5(4):100277. doi:10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    Monterde D et al. Adjusted morbidity groups: A new multiple morbidity measurement of use in Primary Care. Aten Primaria. 2016;48(10):674–682. doi:10.1016/J.APRIM.2016.06.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Cerezo-Cerezo J et al. GOOD PRACTICE BRIEF - Population stratification: A fundamental instrument used for population health management in Spain. Published 2018. Accessed March 2, 2022. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/345586/WHO-EURO-2018-3032-42790-59709-eng.pdf?sequence=3
  31. 31.
    Gangannagaripalli J et al. A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes and Measures of Overall Health in Adults. Patient. 2022;15(3):341–351. doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00554-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.
    Riggs JS et al. PROMIS Global Health: Feasibility in home health. Quality of Life Research. 2021;30(9):2551–2561. doi:10.1007/S11136-021-02845-X/METRICS
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.
    Topp CW et al. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–176. doi:10.1159/000376585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.
    Thomas CC et al. The 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II as an outcome measure for treatment of common mental disorders. Global Mental Health. 2016;3:1–7. doi:10.1017/GMH.2016.7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.
    Kendir C et al. Lessons from early implementation of the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) in primary care: making the case for co-development and adaptation to national contexts. IJQHC Communications. 2023;3(1). doi:10.1093/IJCOMS/LYAD003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    MICA - Monitor Inteligente de Calidad de Aire Interior. Accessed January 5, 2024. https://www.inbiot.es/productos/dispositivos-mica/mica
  37. 37.
    AerisWeather | The Global Weather API & Mapping Platform for Business. Accessed January 5, 2024. https://www.aerisweather.com/
  38. 38.
    Jones PW et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. European Respiratory Journal. 2009;34(3):648–654. doi:10.1183/09031936.00102509
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.
    Stoller JK et al. Further Specification and Evaluation of a New Clinical Index for Dyspnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;134(5):1129–1134. doi:10.1164/arrd.1986.134.5.1129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.
    Nathan RA et al. Development of the Asthma Control Test: A survey for assessing asthma control. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2004;113(1):59–65. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.
    Plaza V et al. Test of Adherence to Inhalers. Arch Bronconeumol. 2017;53(7):360–361. doi:10.1016/J.ARBR.2017.03.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.
    Pinnock H et al. Evaluation of an intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion. Prim Care Respir J. 2004;13(1):36. doi:10.1016/J.PCRJ.2003.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.
    Liu M et al. The predictive utility of the 22-item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22): A scoping review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022;12(1):83–102. doi:10.1002/ALR.22888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Wearables Inteligentes | Beat One, Reloj inteligente salud. Accessed January 5, 2024. https://beat-one.com/
  45. 45.↵
    Putra ADM et al. Implementation of nursing case management to improve community access to care: A scoping review. Belitung Nurs J. 2021;7(3):141–150. doi:10.33546/bnj.1449
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    van Eeden AE et al. Effectiveness of case management in the prevention of COPD re-admissions: a pilot study. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):621. doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2946-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    King GG et al. Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. European Respiratory Journal. 2020;55(2). doi:10.1183/13993003.00753-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Kostorz-Nosal S et al. Window of opportunity for respiratory oscillometry: A review of recent research. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2023;316:104135. doi:10.1016/J.RESP.2023.104135
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    Veneroni C et al. Diagnostic Potential of Oscillometry: A Population-based Approach. https://doi.org/101164/rccm202306-0975OC. Published online November 16, 2023. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202306-0975OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    Walker PP et al. Telemonitoring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chromed) a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(5):620–628. doi:10.1164/RCCM.201712-2404OC/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    Suissa S et al. Long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: severe exacerbations and mortality. Thorax. 2012;67(11):957. doi:10.1136/THORAXJNL-2011-201518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    ALDS by LOTHAR MEDTEC GmbH – Ambulatory Lung Diagnose System (ALDS). Accessed January 5, 2024. https://alds.health/
  53. 53.↵
    Janjua S et al. Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;7(7):CD013196. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. 54.↵
    Schrijver J et al. Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1(1):CD002990. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    Reichheld FF. The one number you need to grow. Harv Bus Rev. 2003;81(12):46–54,124. doi:PMID: 14712543
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Brooke J. SUS a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. Published 1996. Accessed February 14, 2024. https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/survey/systemusabilityscale%2528sus%2529_comp%255B1%255D.pdf
  57. 57.↵
    Uijen AA et al. Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire: development and testing of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1391–1399. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    Wu CT et al. Acute exacerbation of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prediction system using wearable device data, machine learning, and deep learning: Development and cohort study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(5). doi:10.2196/22591
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    Calle ML et al. Letter to the editor: Stability of Random Forest importance measures. Brief Bioinform. 2011;12(1):86–89. doi:10.1093/bib/bbq011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    Ribeiro MT et al. Anchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018;32(1):1527–1535. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V32I1.11491
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.↵
    Department of Health. Government of Catalonia Health plan for 2011-2015. Published 2012. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://scientiasalut.gencat.cat/bitstream/handle/11351/5519/pla_salut_catalunya_2011_2015_ang.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
  62. 62.↵
    Department of Health. Government of Catalonia Health plan for 2016-2020. Published 2016. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://scientiasalut.gencat.cat/handle/11351/4040?locale-attribute=en
  63. 63.↵
    Casas A et al. Integrated care prevents hospitalisations for exacerbations in COPD patients. European Respiratory Journal. 2006;28(1):123–130. doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00063205
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    Hernández C et al. Effectiveness of community-based integrated care in frail COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015;25. doi:10.1038/NPJPCRM.2015.22
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    Rubin DB. Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2001 2:3. 2001;2(3):169–188. doi:10.1023/A:1020363010465
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    A T, et al. Should I stay or should I go? A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis using administrative data of hospital-at-home for older people in Scotland. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5). doi:10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-023350
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. 67.↵
    Diamond A et al. Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2013;95(3):932–945. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00318
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted May 17, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Protocol for the Enhanced Management of Multimorbid Patients with Chronic Pulmonary Diseases: Role of Indoor Air Quality
Alba Gómez-López, Ebymar Arismendi, Isaac Cano, Ramón Farré, María Fígols, Carme Hernández, Antonio Montilla-Ibarra, Núria Sánchez-Ruano, Benigno Sánchez, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Marta Sorribes, Emili Vela, Jordi Piera-Jiménez, Jaume Benavent, Jose Fermoso, Josep Roca, Rubèn González-Colom
medRxiv 2024.05.17.24307036; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.24307036
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area