Abstract
Background Osteosarcoma (OSC) is considered one of the most common malignant bone tumours in adolescents. Due to OSC’s poor prognosis, a comprehensive approach to exploring these aspects is highly needed to improve the survival probability of OSC. In this study, we tried to explore the significance of miRNA-encoded PTEN for clinical-pathological features and prognostic value in OSC.
Method We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis using articles and sources published between 2013 and 2023 from six databases (Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, Sage Pub, and Cochrane). Included studies were clinical cross-sectional studies. Other study designs, articles not written in English, without full text, and not relevant—were excluded. Then, ROBINS-I is used to evaluate the distance. The results are constructed according to the PICOS criteria in a table. The expression of miRNA related to OSC is assessed in the meta-analysis as the main outcome to determine its ability as a diagnostic and prognostic agent for OSC. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines.
Results A total of 17 studies were included in the final screening. The meta-analysis showed significantly increased (p < 0.00001) miRNA expression in patients with osteosarcoma compared to healthy controlled with pooled md (2.85) (95% CI: 2.69, 3.02; I2= 22%, p= 0.20), the high inverse correlation (p < 0.001) between miRNA and PTEN expression was shown as mean effect size (−0.681) (95% CI: −0.787, −0.536; I2 = 75%, p < 0.0001), and the prognostic evaluation of overall survival was significantly increased in low expression miRNA (p < 0.00001) with pooled OR.
Conclusion Fiveteen miRNAs from 17 studies were found, and together with PTEN expression, they may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers for OSC. High-level levels of miRNA expression are correlated with low PTEN expression, leading to a bad prognosis for OSC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
