Developing a User-Friendly Oropharyngeal HPV-16 Point-of-Care Diagnostic: HPV-16 Virus Detection in Oral Rinse Sample Matrix With Colorimetric Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

2.1. Oral rinse and saliva preparation

Oral rinse experiments were prepared using commercially available bottled water (Aquafina, 16.9 oz). Oral rinses were collected and pooled from four participants who abstained from eating food for at least 30 minutes and drinking water for at least 5 minutes before collection. Each participant rinsed and gargled with 15 mL of bottled water (pre-poured into a disposable plastic cup) for 30 seconds before spitting the contents of their mouth back into the cup (D’Souza et al., 2005). Equal proportions of participant rinses were mixed to yield a de-identified oral rinse pool. This oral rinse pool was used in all reported LAMP reactions that utilized an oral rinse sample matrix. The saliva collection protocol described was reviewed and approved as ethical (IRB Protocol 2013-12-007).

The saliva sample matrix was prepared by having four participants fill a centrifuge tube with 2.5 mL of saliva following the same pre-collection protocol described above. The saliva was then sampled from and mixed in equal proportions in another centrifuge tube to yield a de-identified saliva pool. This pooled saliva was added to the LAMP reactions that used saliva as the sample matrix.

2.2. Colorimetric LAMP assay construction

We utilized a colorimetric LAMP system (New England BioLabs, Ipswich MA, USA, cat. #M1800) as a qualitative measure for the amplification of the target DNA sequence. These reactions change color from pink to yellow due to pH change resulting from DNA amplification. Previously published LAMP primers targeting the HPV-16 E7/E1 genes (Saetiew et al., 2011, Table 1) were used in all reactions.

In 0.2 mL tubes (VWR PCR Tubes #53509-304) 25 μL reactions were constructed with the following: 12 ul of NEB 2X Colorimetric Master Mix (contains all necessary ingredients for colorimetric LAMP except primers and template), 2.5 μl of a 10X mix of all primers for a final concentration of 0.2 μM F3 and B3, 1.6 μM FIP and BIP, and 0.4 μM Loop Forward and Loop Backward (Table 2).

These components were combined on the bench at room temperature with an additional 10.5 μl of sample matrix (molecular grade water, oral rise, or saliva) added to bring the volume up to 24 μl. The final microliter was used to inoculate reactions with either molecular biology grade water (Corning, cat. # 46-000-CM) for non-template negative controls (NTC) or with 10³ copies of the HPV-16 E7/E1 DNA for positive template controls (PTC).

PTC synthetic dsDNA was purchased (gBlock, Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.), spanning part of the HPV-16 E7/E1 genes (Saetiew et al., 2011). The dsDNA was resuspended with TE buffer to a concentration of 10¹⁰ copies per μL. and stored frozen at -20 °C. On the same day as the experimental runs, a serial dilution was performed on the thawed 10¹⁰ copies per μL stock with molecular water to a final 10³ copies per μL concentration.

2.4. Incubating the LAMP reactions and scoring results

An 8-strip of PCR tubes containing the reaction mixture was incubated in either a laboratory water bath set to 65 °C or an Ember Temperature Control Smart Mug 2 (EM2), a battery-powered temperature-controlling coffee mug (Ember Technologies, Inc., 14oz #CM19P), set to its highest setpoint of 62.5 °C with 150 mL of water preheated using the laboratory water bath. All EM2 incubations were completed with the EM2 sitting on the saucer charger system.

To promote even heating of the reactions and extend battery life, the EM2 was operated with a styrofoam cap over the top opening. Reactions were scored every 10 minutes during incubation by removing the tubes from the incubator before photographing and returning them to the incubator, taking approximately 15 seconds. Reaction colors were scored with the unaided eye as either pink (P), orange (O), yellow (Y), or with color combinations to represent intermediate levels when needed (e.g., O/Y for an orange-yellow mixture).

3.1. Validation of the Saetiew et al. 2011 LAMP primers

We tested the described HPV16 E7/E1 LAMP reaction with molecular water (molH₂O) as the sample matrix to validate the Saetiew et al. 2011 primers (Table 1) in combination with the colorimetric LAMP reaction mix (Section 2.2). PTCs were inoculated with 10⁴ copies of HPV16 E7/E1 DNA and NTCs were inoculated with molH₂O with no added DNA. These LAMP reactions were scored for amplification (Section 2.4) every 10 minutes over 70 minutes of incubation at 65 °C (Table 3, Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Validation of Saetiew et al. 2011 primers with the NEB colorimetric LAMP system.

PTC molH₂O reactions spiked with 10⁴ copies of HPV16 E7/E1 DNA (indicated by + symbols) and NTC reactions with no added DNA (indicated by - symbols) after 30 minutes (A) and 70 minutes (B) of incubation in a water bath at 65 °C.

The assays were found to be sensitive to 10⁴ copies of HPV16 E7/E1 DNA with full amplification of the PTCs by 30 minutes and no indication of NTC amplification for at least 60 minutes.

3.2. Impact of saliva or oral rinse on LAMP performance

After testing the Saetiew et al. 2011 LAMP primers with the NEB 2X Colorimetric Master Mix (Section 3.2), we tested de-identified pooled saliva and oral rinse as the sample matrix of the assay. These reactions were assembled in the same fashion as before but with molH2O substituted with either saliva or oral rinse (Section 2.1). Reactions were incubated in a water bath for 70 minutes and scored for color change every 10 minutes (Tables 4 and 5, Figure 2).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2: Testing saliva and oral rinse as the sample matrix.

PTC saliva (red labels) or oral rinse (black labels) reactions spiked with 10⁴ copies of HPV16 E7/E1 DNA (indicated by + symbols) and NTC reactions with no added DNA (indicated by - symbols) after 40 minutes (A) and 70 minutes (B) of incubation in a water bath at 65 °C.

The LAMP assay using oral rinse as the sample matrix performed similarly to the assay using molH2O, both having their PTC reactions undergo amplification and color change after 30 minutes, while their NTC reactions changed color only after 70 minutes of incubation at 65 °C in the water bath. The assay using pooled saliva as the sample matrix had PTC reactions that were not distinguishable from NTC reactions regarding color change timing. We ran several more tests of 1/2 and 1/4 dilutions of the pooled saliva by molH2O. We found that both PTCs and NTCs changed colors from pink to yellow after 30 minutes (data not shown).

3.3. Impact of EM2 Mug incubation on LAMP performance

With the saliva not working well, we did not carry out further saliva-based tests. We further characterized the oral rinse colorimetric LAMP system by testing its performance with more dilute inocula and incubation in the EM2 mug (Figure 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3: Using the EM2 battery-powered coffee mug heater to incubate the LAMP reactions.

The assembled EM2 LAMP diagnostic for HPV-16 using a styrofoam cap to prevent heat loss (A). The reactions were incubated using a 3D-printed float (B) as shown (C).

Using oral rinse as the sample matrix, PTCs were inoculated with 10⁴, 10³, or 10² copies of HPV16 E7/E1 DNA to determine the limit of detection (LOD) of the system (Table 6, Figure 4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4: Testing oral rinse as the sample matrix while incubated in the EM2 mug.

PTC oral rinse reactions spiked with 10⁴, 10³, or 10² copies of HPV16 E7/E1 DNA (A) and NTC oral rinse reactions with no added DNA (B) after 70 minutes of incubation in an EM2 mug at 62.5 °C.

The EM2 mug, while connected to its charger, was able to incubate the LAMP reactions at a stable 62.5 °C for the entire 70-minute duration, resulting in the LAMP assay performing similarly to when it was incubated in the water bath at 65 °C (PTC reactions changed color after 20 minutes and 30 minutes, respectively).