Abstract
Background Breastfeeding peer support involves mothers with personal experience of breastfeeding providing support, information, and encouragement to other breastfeeding mothers. The Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative standards require that additional support for new mothers, such as peer support, is provided and that services work together to ensure that mothers can get additional help as needed. As work begins on a national framework for feeding support, we wanted to explore the current activity of breastfeeding supporters in Wales, UK. We aimed to explore the experiences of current, past and trainee breastfeeding peer support volunteers to understand what they need from a refreshed All Wales Breastfeeding Action Plan and how they could benefit.
Methods Current, past and trainee breastfeeding peer support volunteers were invited by Public Health Wales to complete an online survey about their experiences of providing breastfeeding peer support including both open and closed questions. Codebook thematic analysis was used to generate key themes arising from qualitative data.
Results 81 volunteers completed the online survey between 21/12/23 and 22/1/24. Their experiences were described as ’rewarding’ (50% (44/81)) and ‘empowering’ (12%, 10/81), but also ’frustrating’ (19%, 15/81) and ’challenging’ (8%, 7/81). Peer supporters supported basic positioning and latching, challenges with milk supply, frequency of feeds, weaning, and poor weight gain. Three key themes were developed from the open-ended question ‘why did you decide to undertake peer support training?’ (1) Paying it forward (2) Limited peer support in local areas and (3) The need for more support. Funding was noted as a barrier to continuing to provide breastfeeding peer support.
Conclusions Breastfeeding peer support was associated with benefits for the peer supporters themselves and recognised as beneficial for the mothers they helped. Investment in training future breastfeeding peer supporters is essential to ensure the continued success of these important initiatives.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Consent was implied through individuals' decision to participate in the voluntary anonymous survey after being provided with information about the survey's purpose and how findings would be used.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
