Abstract
It is likely that age, dementia status, and dementia subtype all contribute to differences in activity levels among older adults and that accelerometer devices can help us better understand these relationships. To that end, this study analyzes accelerometry data from individuals with dementia (n=104) and individuals without dementia (n=634) who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), as well as from individuals with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB; n=12) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD; n=8) who participated in a small pilot study. In the NHATS cohort, individuals with dementia had lower daily activity counts (t = -5.449, p < 0.001), a shorter active bout length (t = -5.283, p < 0.001), and a longer resting bout length (t = 2.210, p = 0.032) at the mean age of 79 than individuals without dementia at that same age. Differences in data collection and processing prevented direct comparisons between the cohorts, but parallel analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between AD and DLB across these three measures in the smaller cohort. Studies with larger samples of subtyped individuals with dementia will be necessary to detect clinically meaningful differences, but the patterns observed in the small cohort suggest that individuals with DLB are less active, exhibit a shorter active bout length, and exhibit a longer resting bout length than individuals with AD. Taken together, these findings highlight the potential of accelerometers to gather objective activity data that could be used to aid in the early identification of dementia and, potentially, the differentiation of dementia subtypes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R21AG064271 and R33AG064271) and supported in part by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of the VA Puget Sound Health Care System gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Some data used in the present study are available online at https://nhats.org and other data are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
