Abstract
Electronic health records offer great promise for early disease detection, treatment evaluation, information discovery, and other important facets of precision health. Clinical notes, in particular, may contain nuanced information about a patient’s condition, treatment plans, and history that structured data may not capture. As a result, and with advancements in natural language processing, clinical notes have been increasingly used in supervised prediction models. To predict long-term outcomes such as chronic disease and mortality, it is often advantageous to leverage data occurring at multiple time points in a patient’s history. However, these data are often collected at irregular time intervals and varying frequencies, thus posing an analytical challenge. Here, we propose the use of large language models (LLMs) for robust temporal harmonization of clinical notes across multiple visits. We compare multiple state-of-the-art LLMs in their ability to generate useful information during time gaps, and evaluate performance in supervised deep learning models for clinical prediction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants, U01CA274576 and RF1AG063481. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data is openly available at https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv/2.2/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv/2.2/
