Social inequalities in youth mental health in Canada, 2007-2022: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study

Introduction

There is growing global concern about rising mental health problems among young people [1–3]. In Canada, this is evident in the tripling of rates of generalized anxiety disorder and the doubling of rates of major depression among youth aged 15-24 over the past decade [4]. Proposed explanations for the increase include the widespread influence of social media, economic and social stressors, reduced stigma surrounding mental health, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic [1,5]. Despite ongoing research efforts, the full scope of factors driving these trends remains incompletely understood, yet the urgency of addressing this issue is undeniable, given the potential long-term and life course consequences of early mental health challenges [2,3].

Social determinants, including economic deprivation, family and peer relationships, discrimination and social exclusion, and exposure to stressful environments, have a profound influence on youth mental health [2,3]. In Canada, mental health challenges and disorders have been shown to disproportionately affect females, LGBTQ+ youth, Indigenous youth, and those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds [3,4,6,7]. There is evidence that youth mental health has been deteriorating more rapidly among females than males [4], yet less is known about recent inequality trends by other sociodemographic factors.

To address this gap, this study examined trends in mental health inequalities among youth in Canada between 2007 and 2022, a period marked by significant global events including the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. We assess absolute and relative inequalities based on characteristics meaningful to health equity in Canada, including sex/gender, socioeconomic conditions, racialized and Indigenous identity, and sexual orientation.

Methods

Results

The prevalence of poor/fair SRMH increased by 15.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3, 17.4) from 4.3% in 2007-08 to 20.1% in 2021-22 (Figure 1, panel A, presents annual trends in poor/fair SRMH). Two-year prevalence trends stratified by sociodemographic groups are presented in Figure 1, panels B to F, and corresponding estimates for 2007-08 and 2021-22 are shown in Table 1. Significant increases in fair/poor SRMH were evident across all sociodemographic groups, ranging from a 11.1 percentage point rise among male youth (95% CI: 9.0, 13.1) to a 28.1 percentage point rise among youth identifying as LGB (95% CI: 21.2, 34.4). In 2021-22 compared to 2007-08, the sample was substantially more likely to identify as LGB (12.7% vs. 2.5%) and non-Indigenous racialized (31.6% vs 16.0%) (Table 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Prevalence trends for poor/fair self-rated mental health by sociodemographic characteristics, Canadian youth aged 15-24 years

Note: Estimates are from average marginal effects calculated after logistic regression with bootstrap standard errors. Sexual orientation analysis applies to youth aged 18-24 (N=58 750). Indigenous and racialized identity were self-reported. The “racialized, non-Indigenous” group is equivalent to Statistics Canada’s definition of visible minority as “persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in colour” [12].

Prevalence differences show widening absolute inequality in fair/poor SRMH by sex, age group, Indigenous identity, and sexual orientation among young people (Table 1). Between 2007-08 and 2021-22, the gap in fair/poor SRMH increased by 9.9 percentage points (95% CI: 6.9, 12.9) for females vs. males, 3.6 percentage points (95% CI: 0.4, 6.7) for youth aged 20-24 vs. 15-19, 11.4 percentage points (95% CI: 4.6, 18.2) for Indigenous vs. non-racialized youth, and 15.4 percentage points (95% CI: 5.7, 25.1) for youth identifying as LGB vs. heterosexual. Neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status showed little association with youth SRMH. The only declining absolute inequality trend was between non-Indigenous racialized and non-racialized youth (PD change of -4.0 percentage points; 95% CI: -7.8, -0.2).

Relative inequalities in fair/poor SRMH were also evident across several sociodemographic factors, especially in 2021-22. However, in general, relative inequality trends did not parallel absolute inequality trends, reflecting the substantial increase in fair/poor SRMH across all groups. PR estimates were consistent with increasing relative inequality trends by sex, age group, and Indigenous identity, although some 95% Cis included the null value. Relative inequality between non-Indigenous racialized youth and non-racialized youth declined by 32% over time (95% CI: 4%, 61%), which was consistent with the declining absolute inequality trend.

Discussion

In this nationally representative study of over 90 000 youth aged 15-24 years, the prevalence of poor/fair SRMH more than quadrupled from 4.3% to 20.1% between 2007-08 and 2021-22. This trajectory of deteriorating youth mental health seemed to increase in 2020-22, but was well underway prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our results confirmed a widening gap in SRMH between females and males, driven largely by the more than 5-fold increase in fair/poor SRMH among females over the examined period. This is consistent with evidence of a growing disparity in depression, anxiety, and internalizing symptoms between females and males in several high-income countries, including Canada [1,4]. Plausible explanations for the disproportionate mental health declines among females include the influence of digital media, cyber-bullying, academic pressures, and earlier emergence of puberty among females [1,5].

We also found evidence of large and widening SRMH inequality by sexual orientation among young people, with the gap between LGB and heterosexual youth more than doubling from 8.9 to 22.5 percentage points over the decade and a half. The increased risk of mental ill-health among sexual minority youths is well-documented, attributed primarily to heightened stress stemming from discrimination, bullying, lack of social support, and identity struggles [16,17]. Further investigation of this widening mental health gap between LGB and heterosexual youths is warranted, particularly considering Canada’s comprehensive legal protections for sexual and gender minorities [18].

The enduring intergenerational impacts of colonization impose unique structural inequities on Indigenous youth, contributing significantly to mental health disparities [7]. The widening gap in mental health between Indigenous and non-racialized youth underscores the necessity of investing in mental health interventions that “transcend the Western biomedical model, use a strengths-based approach, and account for the cultural practices and belief systems of Indigenous people” [19].

The current study is limited in its reliance on SRMH, a subjective measure lacking specificity as a measure of psychological distress or mental disorder. Nonetheless, SRMH remains widely endorsed for monitoring population mental health [8,20] and supplementary analyses aligning youth SRMH trends with self-reported mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses bolster its validity (see Figure S1). Limitations in sociodemographic measures and sample size considerations hindered a comprehensive examination of mental health trends among gender diverse or non-binary youths, specific racialized or Indigenous populations, and the intersections of different social identities. Finally, utilizing repeated cross-sectional data with fluctuations in response rates and methodology over the 16-year period raises the possibility that trends may reflect differences in surveyed populations over time, although this likelihood is mitigated by incorporating survey weights.

Findings from this study suggest a need for further research to examine the factors contributing to the disproportionate declines in mental health among certain youth populations, especially those from structurally marginalized backgrounds like those identifying as LGB or Indigenous. Additionally, action is needed to both identify and implement evidence-based programs and policies aimed at addressing mental health disparities among youths.