Telehealth use for sexual and reproductive health promotion and care during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive-interpretive qualitative study of healthcare providers’ perspectives and experiences in Western - Central New York State

Introduction

Public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic were unprecedented in modern times regarding its impact on healthcare delivery [1, 2]. Quarantines, institution-wide closures, and reallocation of resources towards emergency services compromised routine sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services [3–5]. Global disruptions in HIV prevention and care were associated with 650,000 HIV-related deaths [510 000–860 000] and 1.5 million [1.1–2.0 million] new HIV infections in 2021 [6]. Moreover, a 2022 scoping review by VanBenschoten et al [7] revealed 86% of SRH clinicians and stakeholders in 29 countries reported that patients had much less access to SRH services due to the pandemic. In the United States (US) the report identified an 80% decrease in HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescriptions. Other US studies reported a stark increase (33%) in maternal deaths after March 2020, albeit some resulted from direct viral infections, others have been attributed to the disrupted health care systems [8]. More than half of clinics canceled or postponed contraceptive visits, and 21% of SRH clinics in the South and Midwest parts of the country closed per COVID-19 pandemic mandates [7]. In addition, electronic survey results from a California-based sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) control branch found sharp declines in reportable bacterial cases of chlamydia (31%), late syphilis (19%), primary/secondary syphilis (15%), early nonprimary non-secondary syphilis (14%), and gonorrhea (13%) between 2019-2020 (9).

As the COVID-19 response intensified, telehealth services emerged as an option for accessing health care services, particularly those services considered non-essential, in order to maintain healthcare delivery in the US and globally [10, 11]. Telehealth, defined as the use of telecommunications and information technology including computers and mobile devices to provide access to health assessment, diagnosis, intervention, consultation, supervision, and information virtually [12–14], enabled patients to access support and clinical care from any location. E-health refers to health services and information delivered or enhanced through the internet and related technologies [14, 15]. Telehealth in combination with e-health helped HCPs to track and manage the health conditions of patients remotely to mitigate COVID transmission [16, 17]. An internet-based study among cisgender women in the US found that telehealth helped to fill in some new SRH service gaps [11]. Due to the pandemic, 24% of women using contraception switched to a telehealth appointment to have prescriptions refilled. Telehealth has been reported to be patient-centered, conducive to self-quarantine, and protecting patients, clinicians, and the community from exposure to infection [10]. More frequent check-ins through telehealth and remote patient monitoring also helped HCPs identify some complications faster, leading to fewer hospitalizations and emergency room visits [16, 17].

Telehealth service delivery during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions has been offered in different ways with live video teleconferencing being the most popular modality [18, 19]. Other modalities included store-and-forward technology which is the transmission of a patient’s medical information to a healthcare provider at a distant site [20], remote patient monitoring such as telehealth coverage of intensive care units, and mobile health applications including text, and email [16, 21]. In the US, most facilities have been reported to use a combination of telephone and video for telehealth visits [18, 19]. Many HCPs also used Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant applications to conduct virtual telehealth visits, which assured patient privacy [19].

In the US, insurable services and processes, health policy, and practice may vary regionally. Therefore, HCP perspectives across state and county levels are needed to address the heterogenous subtleties in telehealth utilization for SRH promotion. Moreover, the experiences of HCPs in Western-Central New York State in their provision of SRH promotion and care during the COVID-19 pandemic has not been well documented. When New York State emerged as one of the epicenters for COVID-19 in 2020, SRH services were significantly reduced with nonessential services closing as of March 22, 2020, while hospitals around the state were encouraged to prioritize their resources to address the pandemic [4]. This impaired facility-based services and in-person health visits. Nevertheless, HCPs were encouraged to promote sexual health, conduct a complete sexual health history, and assess susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections (STIs). An advisory from the New York State Department of Health also offered strategies for healthcare providers and community-based organizations to support sexual and reproductive health and prevent STIs during COVID restrictions [22].

Understanding the experiences of HCPs’ delivery of SRH services in tandem with the uptake and use of telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic is warranted. Such insights can inform the suitability of telehealth for sexual and reproductive health promotion and care, and implementation needs for sustainability of this modality in Western-Central New York.

Methods

This study used a qualitative descriptive-interpretive design [23] to understand the perspectives and experiences of HCPs with the use of telehealth for SRH promotion and care during COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative descriptive interpretive approach allowed the investigators to address complex experiential sexual and reproductive health promotion questions during the COVID-19 pandemic, while understanding practical outcomes and underlying experiences. Researchers wanted to go beyond reporting the findings and interpret what the findings meant in the study context [24]. This approach allowed the advancement of knowledge and experiences surrounding SRH support during COVID-19 pandemic without sacrificing methodological integrity that long-established qualitative approaches provide [24]. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 healthcare providers who had previously been interviewed about sexual health promotion and couple-centered approaches. This sample size was determined by saturation. These providers were a subset of this group and were practicing in women and adolescent health clinics, HIV/STI testing and care, and family medicine settings. Thus, the participants had previously interacted with the researcher in the first phase of the study. These healthcare providers were recruited from October 2019 to February 2021 using maximum variation purposive sampling [25]. The procedures and the analyses of this study were approved by the University of Rochester Institutional Review Board.

Active and passive recruitment strategies were used, which included circulating study flyers via emails; university research listservs and posting flyers in the health care facilities and on social media; and meeting providers at department or facility grand rounds to discuss the research. Subjects were asked to either contact the study team directly or complete a screener form in REDCap to assess their eligibility. Eligibility included being over 18 years old, speaking and understanding English, and being a licensed clinician practicing in New York State with one or more years of experience in sexual and reproductive health. All eligible participants were provided with an information letter that contained study details. Upon reading the information letter in REDCAP, providers indicated their desire to participate in the study, and they all provided written consent. Interested participants were asked to provide their socio demographic and contact information. Upon receipt of the notification of completion of the REDCap survey, the study staff followed up with a phone call and scheduled the interview. None of the participants who were sampled in this subset of the sample refused or dropped out during the interview. The interviews were conducted by the last author NML, a female PhD prepared Assistant Professor and an interdisciplinary nurse researcher, with over 20-year career in public health, nursing, and health research. NML uses multi-method qualitative/quantitative approaches to inquiry, and investigates the ecological, cultural, and systemic factors (social determinants of health) that influence health and wellness outcomes. As a public health specialist, NML is able to critically assess health issues from both public health and clinical perspectives globally and domestically. As a nurse researcher, NML seeks to address and investigate determinants of health disparity, assets within these factors that can be leveraged toward achieving health equity to inform intervention implementation. At the beginning of each the interviewer re-introduced herself and the purpose of the study and verified their interest to participate in the study. All conducted via Zoom, in a private room with only the participant present.

The individual in-depth interviews were guided by a semi-structured interview guide which was piloted on one participant and repeated on another one participant after making the corrections to the interview guide. Each semi-structured in-depth interview concentrated on the experiences of the participants with sexual and reproductive health promotion during the COVID-19 pandemic. This report is focused on the use of telehealth. Participants were asked the following main questions (with follow-up prompts which are note listed):

1. Describe the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine has had on your personal practice in sexual health promotion with patients.

2. What changes have you made to your personal practice in sexual and reproductive health, HIV/STI prevention, and/or care promotion during the COVID-19 pandemic?

3. Describe your experiences with using telehealth during this time including what worked well for you as a provider and for your patients?

The interviews lasted 30-45 minutes and each participant was paid 30 US Dollars for their time. All interviews were recorded with HIPAA compliant University of Rochester Medical Center Zoom and iPad. Field notes were also taken to capture the necessary contextual information. Data were transcribed verbatim by an outsourced transcription company.

Results

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. The participants were predominately white, female, and ranged in years of experience (1-30 years). Narratives from participants revealed three major themes as relates to telehealth use for SRH promotion and care: 1) healthcare providers’ perspectives of telehealth use, 2) healthcare providers’ experiences with telehealth use for SRH promotion and care, and 3) determinants of telehealth implementation.

Discussion

Our study on exploration of HCPs’ experiences with SRH promotion during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed telehealth’s major impact on care delivery across the Western and Central regions of New York state. During the pandemic, sexual health care was not regarded as essential [3, 34, 35]. HCPs transitioned from in-person visits to new appointment modalities and use of mail-order pharmacies, and home STI /HIV testing. This significant shift in care provision for clients exposed facilitators and barriers to telehealth use among HCP in SRH. General barriers were a lack of provider comfort to manage sexual health dynamic and socioeconomic health disparities. These impediments have also been reported in previous studies [18, 19, 36] and are indicative of telehealth being a relatively new mode of care delivery. Telehealth was also perceived to reduce sexual health stigma. Findings indicated that with telehealth, people who would not seek health care due to anticipated stigma, associated with seeking care. Also, home-based testing may have helped increase STI screening within sexual networks and help linked people to care including PrEP care [37, 38]. This finding might explain why as testing for HIV and other STIs reduced significantly globally due to the COVID-19 pandemic (39), in Western New York State, the testing services increased and new STI diagnoses increased by 77% [22].

HCPs in this study reported telehealth benefits for easing access to patients, enhancing the provision of family and couple-based care, and increasing patient comfort, which can be foci for training current and future providers. Such training must be population specific and culturally responsive to client needs and perspectives while simultaneously provide modalities of telehealth care that are appropriate for HCP use in SRH. Despite telehealth being commended as a method for sexual health promotion, this study revealed some important determinants for telehealth implementation. Providers reported challenges to implementation that included: loss to follow up, limited physical assessment, internet interruption, and lack of privacy. Some loss to follow up could be addressed by client access to reliable internet service that is free or affordable, a device with video capabilities and audio/headphone features such as noise cancelation, or access to a safe space with privacy. Optimizing telehealth implementation also requires adjustment to new behavioral expectations for engagement such as looking at a camera for direct eye contact instead of the screen displaying the image of the other person [40]. A client may appear to be uninterested or not focused on the discussion when looking away, impacting the HCP’s interpretation of the client’s mood and affect. Yet, the observation may result from technical concerns related to camera and screen positions. HCP narratives also described limitation for assessing clients’ skin conditions for diagnosis, suggesting need for resources and guidance on clothing choice and lighting, as an environment influences appearance during virtual physical assessments. Perhaps clients need to be provided with telehealth resources that include the necessary equipment to maximize the telehealth visit [40].

Promoting telehealth etiquette can impact unintended interruptions and distractions that can include a choice of background images, filters, attire, or nontraditional visit in public locations. A client may willingly disclose elements of their environment or share that they are speaking candidly while others are present (on camera, or off-camera). However, HCP’s might be uncomfortable and distracted during the health care encounter; echoing the need for HCP to consider practice guidance that mutually reflects client’s input related to intended and preferred telehealth etiquette expectations. HCP’s perspectives in this study support other reports that suggest a need for “screen side etiquette” during telehealth assessment and care to optimize settings (e.g., visual, audio, etc.) and reduce interfering factors from the health care setting or client’s environment [41].

Collective HCP perceptions in the current study underscore the lack of infrastructure preparedness and training for broad use of the telehealth modalities described contribute to the field of research. Prior to the pandemic perspectives on the underutilization of telehealth training in primary care and specialty care for nurse practitioners (NP) and students in NP programs had been reported with the need to increase provider comfort, knowledge, and skills necessary for embracing telehealth at the forefront of health care [42].

The implementation of telehealth for sexual health promotion was facilitated by several factors. Organizational-level factors included the health facility’s capacity in tandem with the already existing plans to introduce telehealth prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Narratives indicated that health facilities that had an already existing plan to implement e-health sexual health services, simply expedited their plan and strategically put in measures to help their clientele adapt to the emerging approach to remote sexual health care delivery. For some, the sudden surge in national use without established governmental and organizational guidance was more of a pandemic attribution than initiation of telehealth in practice. This suggests telehealth was underused and understudied until the COVID-19 pandemic, during which reduced regulations and increased payment parity facilitated a rapid increase in telemedicine consultation [50]. This underutilization and the limited studies regarding telehealth in specialty care may explain why some healthcare providers in this study reported their hesitancy and perceived lack of knowledge, demonstrating mistrust of its effectiveness and adherence to ethical standards and advocating for a combination of virtual and in-person care.

Findings also suggests the need for patient orientation to seeking sexual health considering that telehealth is currently being integrated into the health system. In contrast, agencies that had no existing facilities reportedly were challenged by initiating telehealth use for SRH services. Such that meeting typical and standard SRH needs slowed down or ceased altogether to focus on COVID-19 prevention and care activities.

Providers eventually within their roles began strategizing on how to meet patient’s health needs via telehealth and started slowly to implement telehealth services. Thus, the health providers’ attitude and knowledge of telehealth, and the cordial working relationship between physicians, advanced nurses, nurses, and social workers facilitated and enhanced the patients’ access to sexual and reproductive health care, vital elements in continuity of care [43].

The healthcare providers in this study, like in other previous studies [19] reported the challenges they faced with health insurance not willing to cover the cost when some modalities such as phone calls were used. It was under such circumstances that the healthcare providers’ understanding and willingness to meet the healthcare needs of the patients was essential. This gesture was commendable and aligned with the multifaceted patient-centered sexual healthcare delivery framework which Ohta, Ikeda and Sawa [44], Cuomo, Zucker and Dreslin [45], Gunaratne and Hansen [46] advocated for during the pandemic. Implementation of telehealth was made possible due to provider willingness to render sexual health services even when the facility was faced with profit loss due to reimbursement prohibitions the HCP narratives presented in this study and in other study reports [47].

Additionally, patients’ and HCPs’ understanding of telehealth and its necessity allowed telehealth to be doable, speaking to sustainability of this modality. Notably, 48 states including Washington, D.C., covered some degree of telemedicine in 2016 compared to only 24 states in 2005, based on American Telemedicine Association Coverage and Reimbursement report [48]. Therefore, telehealth reimbursement, although an increased priority for wide-spread enactment, was not a novelty due to the pandemic, as policies and logistics were previously established nationally. Despite increased national dialog, HCPs and patients were not well oriented to telehealth, and most may have needed more time to adjust, due to the rapid uptake of the modality warranted by COVID-19 and in-person restrictions [47]. Therefore, more research, provider and patient training, and orientation are required to develop better strategies and trust care in provision via telehealth service for sexual health promotion [49].

An interdisciplinary lens and subsequent cordial working relationship among the nurses, physicians and the social workers was also reported to facilitate the telehealth services. The nurses were reported to help with other visits that did not necessarily require the physician’s attention such as PrEP management and STI care, while the social workers helped by following up with patients who missed appointments and needed treatment refills, in addition to making sure partners of those diagnosed with STIs were treated. This finding is consistent with previous studies that reported telehealth physicians to be more dependent on their social systems, particularly nurses, than physicians working in-person [50]. During the pandemic, nurses have been reported to play a significant role in ensuring the visit is well coordinated and in ensuring a smooth workflow [50]. Thus, nurses are essential in the delivery of telehealth-based care.

Additionally, the narratives in this study showed that social workers are also critical to the implementation of telehealth for SRH promotion and care. Previous research suggest that social workers help to harness a range of skills and competencies of importance to the emerging needs of the patients during the pandemic including risk assessment, crisis management, advanced care planning, case management, systems navigation, problem solving, resource allocation, and community mobilization [51, 52]. These results show that a meaningful collaborative and mutually respectful interdisciplinary relationship is critical for achieving quality outcomes for patients and for the longevity of the telemedicine operation.

As in-person health services resume, health agencies must consider strategizing to maintain telehealth services in their facilities. Moreover, providers in this study, reportedly saw the merit for telehealth beyond COVID restrictions. Nevertheless, studies report differing views regarding whether telehealth is sustainable for delivering sexual and reproductive health services and that there are some considerations for planning integration of telehealth services. In a previous study by Yelverton et al [19], the participants questioned whether it was feasible for HIV testing services and PrEP to be provided entirely through telehealth and suggested a hybrid combination of remote and in-person delivery. The study also showed that participants questioned whether HIV home testing was done in a proper manner and stressed the need for in-person coaching of clients to ensure high-quality HIV testing and reliable results.

Hollander and Carr [10] report that telehealth needs to be prioritized when healthcare providers are planning health visits. They suggest that health facilities that have telehealth services need to leverage them. Systems lacking such programs can outsource similar services to physicians and support staff provided by multinational telemedicine and virtual healthcare companies. Hollander and Carr [10] and Yelverton et al [19] observe that the current major barrier to large-scale telehealth, is HIV/STI screening that can be overcome by proper coordination of testing and expanding testing sites. It is pivotal to educate future health care providers about these social determinants so that they can work to mitigate the resulting disparities and thereby improve the health of patients and their communities.

Conclusion

This study revealed perspectives emphasizing telehealth as a vital health care technology for continuity of care among clients facing impaired SRH service access, particularly in times when such services are not considered essential. As previous research shows that a slight reduction in HIV and STI screening may increase the rate of HIV infection by almost 8% [53], the increased use in telehealth for SRH promotion and care must be prioritized in research and intervention development. Such efforts can help to continuously meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of all people, achieve the goal to end the HIV epidemic, and reduce the rates of STIs in Western-Central NY and US at large.