Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy

Malte Braitmaier, Sarina Schwarz, Vanessa Didelez, Ulrike Haug
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.24306522

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.24306522
History 
  • November 28, 2024.

Article Versions

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. Malte Braitmaier1,
  2. Sarina Schwarz2,
  3. Vanessa Didelez1,3 and
  4. Ulrike Haug2,4,§
  1. 1Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
  2. 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
  3. 3Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  4. 4Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  1. ↵§Corresponding author: Ulrike Haug, haug{at}leibniz-bips.de, corresponding author email address: haug{at}leibniz-bips.de
Back to top
Posted November 28, 2024.
Download PDF
Email
Misleading and avoidable: design-induced biases in observational studies evaluating cancer screening—the example of site-specific effectiveness of screening colonoscopy
Malte Braitmaier, Sarina Schwarz, Vanessa Didelez, Ulrike Haug
medRxiv 2024.04.29.24306522; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.29.24306522
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area