Abstract
Background Introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has modified treatment modalities for patients with lung cancer, offering new alternatives for treatment. Despite improved survival benefits, ICIs may cause side-effects impacting patients’ quality of life (QoL). We aim to study the changes in global QoL (gQoL) up to 18 months of patients with advanced stage lung cancer after treatment with ICIs between 2015-2021.
Methods and Analysis A longitudinal cohort study was conducted using OncoLifeS data-biobank from the University Medical Center Groningen. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, at the beginning of their ICI treatment (baseline) and then at 6, 12 and 18 months. Using joint modelling, the predicted trajectory of gQoL was studied by treatment regimens up to 18 months, while accounting for the competing risk of death and adjusting for pre-specified covariates.
Results Of 418 participants with median age 66 years, 39% were women. Patients receiving first line immuno-monotherapy with palliative intent had a small improvement ([5-8] points) in their gQoL within first six months, and no clinically significant change ([−5 to 5] points) thereafter, while patients with second/further line immunotherapy with palliative intent had no clinically significant change in their gQoL over 18 months. Patients receiving first line chemo-immunotherapy with palliative intent had a small improvement in their gQoL over 18 months, while patients receiving first line chemo-radiotherapy followed by Durvalumab with curative intent had no clinically significant change in their gQoL over 18 months.
Conclusion The differences in gQoL over time among patients with varying treatment regimens based on drug intensity, line and intent of treatment may help clinicians and patients understand the potential dynamic of treatments on QoL. It may further influence treatment decisions and patient management strategies, reflecting the practical implications of different treatment regimens.
Key Messages What is already known on this topic
Immunotherapy has significantly helped in modifying treatment modalities for patients with advanced stage (stage 3 and 4) lung cancer, despite the unsatisfactory prognosis of this disease. In comparison to conventional therapies like chemotherapy, various trials reported more favourable outcomes in the health related QoL domain for patients who underwent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which is a type of immunotherapy. Despite its benefits in terms of survival, longer time until deterioration in QoL and better control of symptoms after immunotherapy, ICIs may impact patients’ QoL due to its side-effects. However, such evidence has largely been drawn from clinical trials which not only have a strict eligibility criteria but also a relatively short follow-up of under one year, while treatment with immunotherapy may last up to two years. Although some patients with lung cancer achieve deep and durable responses with ICIs, not all patients benefit and develop side-effects which may impact their QoL.
What this study adds
The main aim of this analyses was to study the changes in gQoL (measure by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, version 3) over a period of 1.5 years after receiving treatment with ICIs for advanced stage lung cancer. Using joint models which account for the competing risk of death and adjusts for prespecified covariates such as baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, we predicted and assessed the differences in the gQoL over time of patients who had different treatment regimens for their lung cancer diagnosis. Our analyses showed that patients receiving first line immuno-monotherapy with a palliative intent had a small improvement in their gQoL within first six months of ICI treatment, a trivial change up to one year and then a small deterioration thereafter, compared to patients with second/further line immunotherapy, who had a trivial change in their gQoL over 1.5 years after ICI treatment. Moreover, patients who had first line chemo-radiotherapy followed by Durvalumab with a curative intent had a small deterioration in their gQoL in first six months following ICI treatment, a trivial change up to one year and then a small improvement thereafter. Patients receiving first line chemo-immunotherapy with a palliative intent had a small improvement in their gQoL over 1.5 years. As a secondary outcome, we studied how the functional scores of patients change over 1.5 years, indicating their physical, social, emotional, role and cognitive wellbeing. While emotional, social and cognitive scores had trivial changes over time, physical and role functioning had a small deterioration over 1.5 years after ICI treatment.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
The differences in gQoL over time among patients with varying treatment regimens based on drug combination, line and intent of treatment may help guide clinicians and patients of potential benefits and impairments of treatments on QoL.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 875171
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine gave ethical approval for this work Scientific committee OncoLifeS of University Medical Center Groningen gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
