Abstract
Despite a preponderance of evidence, and considerable resources, health & social inequities persist and there is evidence of widening unfair differences in markers of health and care. While power imbalances created by broader structural and economic systems are major influencing factors, reform within health inequities research, policy and health and social care practice is key to both bottom-up and top-down change. We aimed to develop agreement for an iterative set of guiding principles underpinning ways of working for a newly formed Health and Social Equity Collective comprising researchers, community leaders, policymakers, and health and care professionals, seeking to address inequity by identifying and engaging the levers of change within and across institutions. The principles aim to inform a more inclusive and translational knowledge base through research practices, tackling entrenched inequalities in education, training, and capacity-building; and centring communities affected by health inequities through engagement and advocacy. We carried out a modified Delphi consensus process between March and September 2022 with Collective members and networks through online workshops and surveys. Out of 24 consensus statements developed and refined over a workshop and three successive survey rounds, we identified eleven key principles agreed upon by a majority of respondents. Two of these were rated high priority by over 75% of respondents, four by over 60% and five by over 50%. These could be grouped into three main topics detailing ways of working and change needed within: ‘Knowledge and framing of health and social inequities, and incorporation into practice’, ‘Community engagement, involvement and peer research’, and ‘Organisational culture change’. Given the pressing need to address inequities, these principles offer a grounding for future consensus building initiatives which also incorporate a wider diversity of perspectives, and which should be iteratively updated with ongoing learning from health equity initiatives nationally and internationally.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This paper represents independent research carried out by the Health and Social Equity Collective which received funding from the Kings Together initiative (Kings College London) and from Impact on Urban Health. S. L. H. and J.O. are part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. C.W., and S.L.H. are supported by the ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health at Kings College London (ESRC Reference: ES/S012567/1). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funders.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
