Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis

Introduction

Domestic violence, also called intimate partner violence (IPV) or domestic abuse, refers to physical, emotional, sexual, and financial abuse within close adult relationships, most often intimate partner relationships. It also encompasses abuse in the form of coercive and controlling behaviours [1]. Domestic violence is addressed in international and national legislation to varying degrees. The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence is the first European instrument that aims to legally prevent or legislate for the prevention of gender-based violence. It aims to protect victims of violence and punish perpetrators of domestic violence. It provides a framework of measures to prevent and combat domestic violence at international and national levels. These include raising awareness, data collection, legislation, training, education, and improvement of resources. As of January 2024, the Convention has been signed by all EU Member States and ratified by 22 states [2]. In Ireland, domestic violence is dealt with in both criminal and civil law. The first significant legislation in Ireland regarding domestic violence was included in the Family Law (Maintenance of Spouses and Children) Act 1976 which provided statutory entitlement to apply for a barring order. Following this, the Family Law (Protection of Spouses and Children) Act 1981 was introduced and provided for protection orders. In 1996, the Domestic Violence Act introduced the safety order which was effectively a more permanent protection order. In more recent years, The Domestic Violence Act 2018 improved domestic violence legislation in Ireland, consolidated existing law on domestic violence and provided additional protections. This legislation also introduced two new criminal offences: forced marriage and coercive control [3].

A European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) study found that just over one in five women experienced domestic violence in the European Union [4]. Globally, almost one in three women are subjected to intimate partner violence at least once in their lives [5]. The lockdown restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic further compounded this issue, leaving women more isolated and made it more difficult to seek assistance and access pathways to safety [6]. Pregnancy and the postpartum period are identified as times of increased risk of domestic violence as this is often when violence first occurs or escalates [1]. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the worldwide prevalence of domestic violence in pregnancy found that there is variance in the rates of domestic violence reported [7]. The review found that this is due to the use of various definitions of domestic violence, the measurement strategy, and the socio-cultural context of the population studied [7]. The authors found that the global prevalence rate of domestic violence in pregnancy was 25.0% (95% CI 20.4–30.7). Prevalence figures were higher in Africa (36.1%, 95% CI 27.7–45.4) than in Asia (32.1%, 95% CI 22.7–43.2), and in South America (25.6%, 95% CI 21.1–30.7) and North America (20.4%, 95% CI 6.9–47.1). The lowest prevalence was reported for Europe (5.1%, 95% CI 3.4–7.5) [7]. This review retrieved data from over 50 countries and found that overall, one in ten mothers were exposed to physical violence, one in five to psychological violence and one in twenty to sexual violence [7].

In 2021, in Ireland, a total of 152 women reported to Women’s Aid that they had been abused in pregnancy, while 41 had suffered a miscarriage due to domestic violence [8]. Domestic violence in pregnancy may lead to mortality and/or lifelong multiple morbidities for both the woman and fetus; these include but are not limited to, first and second trimester miscarriage, placental abruption, preterm labour, low birth weight infant, depression, and anxiety [9].

Women’s increased contact with healthcare professionals during pregnancy offers a unique opportunity to identify and support those who are experiencing domestic violence. Research demonstrates that a protocol of routinely asking all women if they are experiencing domestic violence in pregnancy supports women to disclose and seek supports [10, 11, 12]. Screening aims to identify women who have experienced or are currently experiencing domestic violence and to offer interventions [13]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that healthcare professionals enquire about domestic violence in the peripartum period [14]. Whilst a Cochrane review found insufficient evidence to recommend asking all women about domestic violence in healthcare settings, it did state that screening may be beneficial and that healthcare professionals should be trained to ask women who show signs of abuse or those in high-risk groups and provide them with a supportive response and information [13]. There are many validated screening tools used globally, the most common tools tested are the Abuse Assessment Screen, Woman Abuse Screening Tool, and the HITS (Hurts, Insults, Threaten, Scream) tool [15]. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the types of tools used, the frequency and timing of enquiry, and the response/referral pathways across healthcare professions [16,17].

Midwives, public health nurses, doctors, and medical social workers are in the unique position of having regular contact with women during pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period. Research has highlighted a lack of consistent domestic violence education with many healthcare professionals lacking confidence and feeling unprepared to screen for and respond to disclosures of violence [16, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Previous research in this area has mainly focused on barriers to women disclosing domestic violence [15, 22]. While there is some research regarding the role and experiences of health care professionals such as midwives, doctors and nurses [18,20] little is understood about the collective experience of maternity care professionals who screen for and respond to domestic violence in the peripartum period. This qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) aims to integrate the findings from studies that explore the experiences of the relevant maternity healthcare professionals and identify what enables them to feel more prepared to enquire about and respond to women’s disclosures of domestic violence. The findings of this QES will deepen understanding of the collective experiences of maternity care providers in this situation and aid in identifying potential gaps in clinical practice and education around this important issue.

Protocol

Inclusion criteria

The SPIDER (sample, phenomenon of interest, design, evaluation, and research type) tool is used to develop the key concepts and the inclusion criteria in this QES.

Sample: Maternity health care professionals who provide peripartum care. These include midwives, obstetric nurses, public health nurses, community nurses, doctors, general practitioners, obstetricians, medical social workers/social workers.

Phenomenon of Interest: Maternity care professionals’ experiences of screening for and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period.

Design: Qualitative studies of any design will be included. Mixed method design studies where qualitative data can be extracted and any studies that provide qualitative data, such as responses to open-ended questions in surveys, will also be considered for inclusion.

Evaluation: Analytical themes that depict maternity health care professionals’ experience of screening for and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period.

Research type: English language, published, peer reviewed qualitative studies, and mixed methods or quantitative studies where qualitative data can be extracted separately will be considered for inclusion.

Assessment of methodological quality

The assessment of methodological quality of included studies and the use of appraisal tools in QES is becoming increasingly popular [26]. Assessment of methodological quality of studies included in a QES can provide useful information on the robustness of the conduct of studies and the credibility of conclusions and increase understanding of the transferability of the findings [27]. The decision of which appraisal tool to use depends on the objectives of the QES, time, resources, and the expertise of the researcher [28]. The Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP, 2018) qualitative studies tool, which uses 10 questions, will be used to assess methodological quality of included studies (Table 2). Two reviewers will independently assess all included studies. Consensus will be reached following discussion between the reviewers or assessment by a third reviewer, if required. All screened studies will undergo data extraction and synthesis as the findings from all included studies, irrespective of their methodological quality, may be applicable to the aim of the review.

Discussion

Research has shown that most women are in favour of routine questioning if asked in a sensitive manner and by a well-trained health professional. It has been argued that such an approach leads to increased rates of disclosure [31, 32]. Previous research has mainly focused on barriers to women disclosing domestic violence. These barriers include shame, stigma, fear of judgement or not being believed and confidentiality concerns [13,22]. There is a lack of exploration of the collective experience of maternity healthcare professionals who screen for and respond to domestic violence, particularly their education and preparedness for this in clinical practice. Despite the evidence to suggest that screening is useful in identifying domestic violence [13] it appears that healthcare professionals may not always feel prepared to ask and respond to or respond effectively to a disclosure [33,34]. For example, in two studies conducted with healthcare professionals, doctors and nurses reported receiving little or no training in responding to domestic violence [35,36]. Research has found how challenging it can be for a healthcare professional to ask women about a history of domestic violence, either routinely or if a risk is identified [11]. Healthcare professionals identified a lack of knowledge, education and feeling unsupported, unprepared, and unconfident when screening for domestic violence as significant challenges in clinical practice. Previous studies also identified a lack of implementation of consistent guidelines, and lack of knowledge of the services or referrals that were available as barriers to healthcare professionals screening for domestic violence (16,37,38] Henriksen et al in their study, highlighted a lack of motivation by health professionals to screen women, due to a feeling of insecurity regarding what to do if violence was disclosed [39].

To our knowledge, this QES will be the first to synthesise qualitative data on the collective experiences and preparedness of maternity healthcare professionals in screening for and responding to domestic violence in the peripartum period. This QES aims to focus on what enables maternity healthcare professionals to feel prepared to enquire and respond to disclosures of domestic violence and to identify any professional discipline specific educational and clinical requirements.

Funding

None

Declaration of Competing Interest

None declared

Data availability Underlying data

No data are associated with this article

Registered on PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews on 30/9/23

Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023464776

Reporting guidelines

Open Science Framework: Prisma-P checklist for Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Reflexivity statement

There is increasing recognition that reflexivity is an essential component of qualitative research [40]. Reflexivity is a process of continuous, collaborative practices that researchers adopt to consciously critique, appraise, and evaluate how their background or subjectivity may influence the research process [40]. This QES will utilise a reflective approach throughout the research process. To enhance the trustworthiness of the findings, a research diary will be kept documenting the process, reviewers will have frequent discussions regarding descriptive and analytical themes and quotations from primary studies will be included to support the findings of the review [41].

Authors’ Contributions

LOS will undertake this QES as part of her PhD project. LOS conceptualised the review question under supervision of DD and MC. LOS, DD and MC had active roles in contributing to the design of the QES protocol. LOS drafted the protocol manuscript. DD and MC contributed to the writing through review and editing.

Supporting Information

Open Science Framework: Prisma-P checklist for Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.