ABSTRACT
Background Extreme events (e.g., floods and disease outbreaks) can overwhelm healthcare workers (HCWs) and healthcare systems. During the COVID-19 pandemic, high levels of distress and mental ill health were reported by HCWs.
Aim To examine and synthesise research findings reported in the qualitative literature regarding the stressors, and their psychosocial impacts, that HCWs faced in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to provide lessons for future support.
Method Qualitative articles were identified in EMBASE and OVID [pre-registered on PROSPERO: CRD42022304235]. Studies needed to have been published between January 2021 and January 2022 and to have examined the impact of COVID-19 on UK healthcare workers. We included 27 articles that represented the experiences of 2,640 healthcare workers, assessed their quality using the NICE criteria, and integrated their findings using thematic synthesis.
Results Several secondary stressors were identified apart from the SARS-CoV-2 virus (the primary stressor), including lack of personal protective equipment, ineffective leadership and communication, high workloads, and problems stemming from uncertainty and a lack of knowledge. These stressors were related to various adverse psychosocial outcomes including worrying about oneself and others, fatigue, lack of confidence in oneself and in senior managers, impacts on teamwork, and feeling unappreciated or that one’s needs are not recognised.
Conclusions Distress in HCWs proliferated due to the influence of secondary stressors. However, they can be modified to remove their negative effects. Consequently workforce planning should shift from focusing on individual change towards amending psychosocial environments in which healthcare staff work.
Competing Interest Statement
AW is employed by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). AW completed this work independent of ICER. Collection of the 27 articles reported on in this paper was funded by NHS England. NHS England did not commission and had no input into designing the methodology of the systematic review reported in this paper. It made no contribution to the analyses or to interpretation of the findings. The information contained in the report represents the views of the research team and does not represent the views of NHS England or the authors' employing institutions.
Funding Statement
Collection of the 27 articles reported on in this paper was funded by NHS England. NHS England did not commission and had no input into designing the methodology of the systematic review reported in this paper. It made no contribution to the analyses or to interpretation of the findings. The information contained in the report represents the views of the research team and does not represent the views of NHS England or the authors' employing institutions.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
evangelos.ntontis{at}open.ac.uk, luzynska.k{at}gmail.com, richard.williams{at}southwales.ac.uk, luzynska.k{at}gmail.com, abigailchristinewright{at}gmail.com, a.rousaki{at}sheffield.ac.uk
We have edited some methodological information so that our process is more clear to readers. Introduction and Discussion have also been expanded, including lessons for practitioners.
Data Availability
This study is a systematic review of published papers - all the studies used in the review are listed in a table in the paper itself.
