ABSTRACT
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and significantly increases the risk of ischemic stroke, one of its most serious complications. The intricate relationship between AF and stroke necessitates careful consideration in the timing of anticoagulant therapy initiation to prevent stroke recurrence, hemorrhagic transformation, and other complications.
Aim This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early versus late initiation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with AF after an ischemic stroke, addressing the critical gap in optimal timing to balance the risk of recurrent stroke against bleeding risks.
Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA-2020 guidelines, with searches performed across multiple databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials comparing early versus later initiation of anticoagulation in AF patients post-stroke were included. Data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, considering recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality as primary outcomes.
Results From 1444 identified records, three studies and 2989 patients were included, comprising a diverse population in terms of geography and demographics. Meta-analysis revealed that early anticoagulation initiation might be associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.51-1.00])(p=0.05), although statistical significance was borderline. No significant differences were found in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or mortality rates between early and late initiation. Early intervention was, however, associated with a reduction in other adverse outcomes (RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.54-0.96])(p=0.03).
Conclusions Early initiation of anticoagulation therapy in AF patients post-ischemic stroke may offer a protective effect against recurrent ischemic events with no significant increase in bleeding or mortality risks. This suggests that early anticoagulation can be safely considered, particularly in light of reducing other adverse outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
-
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data referenced in this manuscript are available upon request from the corresponding author.
