Abstract
Introduction Patient portals allowing access to electronic health care records and services can inform and empower, but may widen existing sociodemographic inequities. We aimed to describe associations between activation of a paediatric patient portal and patient race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and markers of previous engagement with health care.
Methods A retrospective single site cross-sectional study was undertaken to examine patient portal adoption amongst families of children receiving care for chronic or complex disorders within the United Kingdom. Descriptive and multivariable regression analysis was undertaken to describe associations between predictors (Race/Ethnicity, age, socio-economic deprivation status based on family residence, and previous non-attendance to outpatient consultations) and outcome.
Results A sample of 3687 children, representative of the diverse ‘real world’ patient population, was identified. Of these 37% (1364) were from a White British background, 71% (2631) had English as the primary family spoken language (PSL), 14% (532) lived in areas of high deprivation, and 17% (643) had high (>33%) rates of non-attendance. The families of 73% (2682) had activated the portal. In adjusted analyses, English as a PSL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.66-2.36) was positively associated with portal activation, whilst families from British Black African backgrounds (aOR 0.58, 0.44-0.77), those living in areas of deprivation (aOR 0.81, 0.67-0.98) or with high rates of non-attendance (aOR 0.32, 0.27-0.39) were less likely to use the portal.
Conclusions Socio-economic deprivation, race/ethnicity and previous low engagement with health care services are potentially key drivers of widening inequity in access to health care following the implementation of patient portals, a digital health innovation intended to inform and empower patients. Health care providers should be aware that innovative human-driven engagement approaches, targeted towards under-served communities, are needed to ensure equitable access to high quality patient-centred care.
Author Summary From a retrospective cross-sectional study of 3687 children with complex health disorders within a specialist paediatric care centre, the families of 73% had adopted an electronic patient portal within 2.5 years of portal launch. Relative socio-economic deprivation, family ethnic backgrounds and previous poor engagement with health care services were independently associated with lower odds of family adoption There was evidence of a potential differential impact of socioeconomic deprivation and spoken language across different ethnic groups. We report that equitable uptake of digital health services by children’s families requires health care providers to implement engagement approaches developed in partnership with under-served communities. However, those underserved communities should also have access to alternative patient centred communication pathways to ensure true inclusion in health care provision. Care providers must be particularly careful to offer these alternative pathways to families who have struggled to interact with healthcare in the past.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
AL Solebo is supported by an NIHR Clinician Scientist award CS-2018-18-ST2-005. This work was undertaken at UCL Institute of Child Health / Great Ormond Street Hospital for children which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional approvals necessary to undertake this project were obtained from the Great Ormond Street Hospital Institutional Review Board (Institutional Clinical Quality Project board, GOSH ICQB). As the project was defined as a service evaluation study by the board, GOSH ICQB waived ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Individual level data are not being made available for this study involving human research participant data. Consent for publication of raw data was not obtained (as this approach may have led to differential non-inclusion of certain patient groups with resultant inability to evaluate study hypothesis) and the dataset could in theory pose a threat to confidentiality. Guidance was sought from the hospital IRB.
