Follow this preprint
Impact of the 2013 WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of cervical precancerous lesions on women’s screening rates, by HIV-status, in East and Southern Africa: A regression discontinuity design analysis
View ORCID ProfileDavid Chipanta, Connie Osborne, Julia Bohlius, Ani Shakarishvilia, Silas Amo-Agyei, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Janne Anton Markus Estill, Olivia Keiser
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.05.24305378
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
David Chipanta
1Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Windhoek, Namibia; Geneva, Switzerland
Connie Osborne
2National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council, Lusaka, Zambia
Julia Bohlius
3Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Bern, Basel, Switzerland
Ani Shakarishvilia
1Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Windhoek, Namibia; Geneva, Switzerland
Silas Amo-Agyei
4University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando
5Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
Janne Anton Markus Estill
6Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Olivia Keiser
6Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Data Availability
The data is publicly available. It can be accessed with a request at https://phia-data.icap.columbia.edu
Posted April 06, 2024.
Impact of the 2013 WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of cervical precancerous lesions on women’s screening rates, by HIV-status, in East and Southern Africa: A regression discontinuity design analysis
David Chipanta, Connie Osborne, Julia Bohlius, Ani Shakarishvilia, Silas Amo-Agyei, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Janne Anton Markus Estill, Olivia Keiser
medRxiv 2024.04.05.24305378; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.05.24305378
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
0
Author Videos
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (411)
- Allergy and Immunology (725)
- Anesthesia (214)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3093)
- Dermatology (261)
- Emergency Medicine (463)
- Epidemiology (13026)
- Forensic Medicine (13)
- Gastroenterology (861)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4845)
- Geriatric Medicine (447)
- Health Economics (750)
- Health Informatics (3058)
- Health Policy (1104)
- Hematology (410)
- HIV/AIDS (958)
- Medical Education (453)
- Medical Ethics (120)
- Nephrology (500)
- Neurology (4610)
- Nursing (244)
- Nutrition (687)
- Oncology (2389)
- Ophthalmology (675)
- Orthopedics (268)
- Otolaryngology (333)
- Pain Medicine (301)
- Palliative Medicine (87)
- Pathology (515)
- Pediatrics (1239)
- Primary Care Research (522)
- Public and Global Health (7191)
- Radiology and Imaging (1603)
- Respiratory Medicine (943)
- Rheumatology (459)
- Sports Medicine (403)
- Surgery (512)
- Toxicology (65)
- Transplantation (221)
- Urology (189)