Follow this preprint
Can self-testing be enhanced to hasten safe return of healthcare workers in pandemics? Random order, open label trial using two manufacturers’ SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow devices concurrently
View ORCID ProfileXingna Zhang, View ORCID ProfileChristopher P Cheyne, View ORCID ProfileChristopher Jones, View ORCID ProfileMichael Humann, View ORCID ProfileGary Leeming, View ORCID ProfileClaire Smith, View ORCID ProfileDavid M Hughes, View ORCID ProfileGirvan Burnside, View ORCID ProfileSusanna Dodd, View ORCID ProfileRebekah Penrice-Randal, View ORCID ProfileXiaofeng Dong, View ORCID ProfileMalcolm G Semple, View ORCID ProfileTim Neal, View ORCID ProfileSarah Tunkel, View ORCID ProfileTom Fowler, View ORCID ProfileLance Turtle, View ORCID ProfileMarta Garcia-Finana, View ORCID ProfileIain E Buchan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.04.24305332
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Xingna Zhang
1Dept. Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
2Dept. Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Christopher P Cheyne
2Dept. Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3Liverpool City Region Civic Data Cooperative, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Christopher Jones
5Dept. Clinical Infection, Microbiology & Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Michael Humann
6Dept. Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Gary Leeming
3Liverpool City Region Civic Data Cooperative, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Claire Smith
3Liverpool City Region Civic Data Cooperative, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
David M Hughes
2Dept. Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Girvan Burnside
2Dept. Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Susanna Dodd
2Dept. Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Rebekah Penrice-Randal
4Dept. Infection Biology & Microbiomes, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Xiaofeng Dong
4Dept. Infection Biology & Microbiomes, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Malcolm G Semple
5Dept. Clinical Infection, Microbiology & Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Tim Neal
7Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
Sarah Tunkel
8UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
Tom Fowler
8UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
9William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of, London, UK
Lance Turtle
5Dept. Clinical Infection, Microbiology & Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
7Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
Marta Garcia-Finana
2Dept. Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Iain E Buchan
1Dept. Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3Liverpool City Region Civic Data Cooperative, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Data Availability
The study required person identifiable data and the main analyses were conducted on a de-identified extract. The fully anonymised data for reproducing the results are available from https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN47058442. The study protocol can be downloaded from https://github.com/iain-buchan/cipha/blob/master/SMART_Release_Return.pdf and statistical analysis plan from https://github.com/iain-buchan/cipha/blob/master/SMART_RR_SAP.pdf.
Posted May 20, 2024.
Can self-testing be enhanced to hasten safe return of healthcare workers in pandemics? Random order, open label trial using two manufacturers’ SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow devices concurrently
Xingna Zhang, Christopher P Cheyne, Christopher Jones, Michael Humann, Gary Leeming, Claire Smith, David M Hughes, Girvan Burnside, Susanna Dodd, Rebekah Penrice-Randal, Xiaofeng Dong, Malcolm G Semple, Tim Neal, Sarah Tunkel, Tom Fowler, Lance Turtle, Marta Garcia-Finana, Iain E Buchan
medRxiv 2024.04.04.24305332; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.04.24305332
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
0
Author Videos
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (420)
- Allergy and Immunology (745)
- Anesthesia (217)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3208)
- Dermatology (270)
- Emergency Medicine (476)
- Epidemiology (13212)
- Forensic Medicine (19)
- Gastroenterology (887)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5043)
- Geriatric Medicine (469)
- Health Economics (771)
- Health Informatics (3168)
- Health Policy (1122)
- Hematology (419)
- HIV/AIDS (997)
- Medical Education (467)
- Medical Ethics (125)
- Nephrology (513)
- Neurology (4783)
- Nursing (253)
- Nutrition (708)
- Oncology (2464)
- Ophthalmology (698)
- Orthopedics (277)
- Otolaryngology (336)
- Pain Medicine (318)
- Palliative Medicine (89)
- Pathology (528)
- Pediatrics (1272)
- Primary Care Research (546)
- Public and Global Health (7344)
- Radiology and Imaging (1663)
- Respiratory Medicine (963)
- Rheumatology (471)
- Sports Medicine (413)
- Surgery (532)
- Toxicology (69)
- Transplantation (227)
- Urology (199)