Abstract
Background and Hypothesis Individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD) show disruptions in self-referential gaze perception—a social perceptual process related to symptoms and functioning. However, our current mechanistic understanding of these dysfunctions and relationships is imprecise.
Study Design The present study used mathematical modeling to uncover cognitive processes driving gaze perception abnormalities in SZ and BD, and how they relate to cognition, symptoms, and social functioning. We modeled the behavior of 28 SZ, 38 BD, and 34 controls (HC) in a self-referential gaze perception task using drift-diffusion models (DDM) parameterized to index key cognitive components: drift rate (evidence accumulation efficiency), drift bias (perceptual bias), start point (expectation bias), threshold separation (response caution), and non- decision time (encoding/motor processes).
Study Results Results revealed that aberrant gaze perception in SZ and BD was driven by less efficient evidence accumulation, perceptual biases predisposing self-referential responses, and greater caution (SZ only). Across SZ and HC, poorer social functioning was related to greater expectation biases. Within SZ, perceptual and expectancy biases were associated with hallucination and delusion severity, respectively.
Conclusions These findings indicate that diminished evidence accumulation and perceptual biases may underlie altered gaze perception in patients and that SZ may engage in compensatory cautiousness, sacrificing response speed to preserve accuracy. Moreover, biases at the belief and perceptual levels may relate to symptoms and functioning. Computational modeling can, therefore, be used to achieve a more nuanced, cognitive process-level understanding of the mechanisms of social cognitive difficulties, including gaze perception, in individuals with SZ and BD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This material is based upon work supported by the: National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1841052 (to CAL); National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH122491 to IFT); Prechter Bipolar Research Program. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of the University of Michigan Medical School gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵^ Denotes shared senior authorship
1) We revised the introduction, analysis, and discussion to better incorporate the BD sample. 2) We adapted our statistical analyses for correlations and regressions from a frequentist approach to a Bayesian one, making the analyses consistent with our Bayesian modeling approach. 3) We made significant revisions to the supplement to make it easier to understand, navigate, and connect to the main text. 4) We added two additional modeling steps (parameter recovery for the winning model and a confusion matrix to the model evaluation). 5) We added a signal detection analysis to the traditional metrics.
Data Availability
Participants did not provide permissions for open-access data sharing so the raw data is not publicly available. However, to promote transparency, replicability, and reproducibility, code used for modeling and analyses, is available on GitHub (github.com/CarlyLasagna/gazeddm_sz_bd) and OSF (osf.io/x5n93/?view_only=c5e6d4bf6fbe48bebe9e28d6938b9246).
https://www.osf.io/x5n93/?view_only=c5e6d4bf6fbe48bebe9e28d6938b9246
