Abstract
Background The intersection of cryptocurrency, especially Bitcoin, with public health issues, particularly synthetic opioid-related deaths, presents an emerging field of study. This research explores the statistical relationship between Bitcoin market fluctuations and synthetic opioid mortalities, against the backdrop of Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) enforcement actions.
Methods Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, this study employs Pearson correlation and linear regression models to investigate the relationship between annual Bitcoin price fluctuations and synthetic opioid-related death rates, alongside DEA domestic arrest trends.
Results A pronounced positive correlation (r = 0.92) was found between Bitcoin price changes and synthetic opioid mortality rates, with the Bitcoin price accounting for approximately 84.78% of the variance in opioid-related deaths (R² = 0.8478). The analysis also notes a disparity between increasing synthetic opioid fatalities and decreasing DEA domestic arrests.
Conclusions The findings reveal significant correlations between Bitcoin price fluctuations and synthetic opioid-related fatalities, highlighting potential gaps in current drug enforcement strategies. This study underscores the need for an interdisciplinary approach to address the complexities introduced by cryptocurrency in the opioid crisis and suggests the necessity of integrating financial and public health strategies to combat emerging drug abuse trends.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research described utilized exclusively publicly available data and did not involve direct human subjects therefore, Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight was not required. This decision is based on the nature of the data and the methodology of the study, which did not engage in the collection of private or sensitive information from individuals.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The data available from the provided sources include: U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) historical data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Historical Bitcoin price data from CoinCodex. Statistics on domestic arrests from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Bitcoin price history and current prices from Google Finance. These resources offer publicly accessible data relevant for economic, legal, and financial research. For full details, visit the respective websites: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDP https://coincodex.com/article/31832/bitcoin-price-history/. https://www.dea.gov/data-and-statistics/domestic-arrests. https://www.google.com/finance/quote/BTC-KRW?sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiksrKD-_qEAxU8h1YBHT_mBvkQ-fUHegQIJhAf&window=MAX.
