Abstract
Background Obesity is common among older adults in the US, but Medicare policies prohibit coverage of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) and may limit access to effective treatment.
Objective To describe first-time prescribing and dispensing of AOM glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) among eligible older adults, stratified by Medicare age eligibility.
Methods Adults aged 60-69 with overweight or obesity and without Type II diabetes (T2D) were identified from Truveta Data. Data included EHR (encounters, prescriptions, conditions, BMI) and medication dispensing for a collective of US healthcare systems. Eligibility required an outpatient office encounter between June 2021 and January 2024 with a BMI ≥ 27, a negative history of GLP-1 RA use, and a follow-up ≥60 days later. Patients were stratified by Medicare age eligibility (60-64 vs. 65-69) and the proportions prescribed and subsequently dispensed AOM GLP-1 RA were compared.
Results In total, 413,833 AOM eligible older adults were included in our cohort, with 208,067 (50.3%) Medicare-aged adults and 205,766 (49.7%) adults aged 60-64. Among eligible patients, 0.2% of Medicare-aged patients and 0.4% of patients aged 60-64 were prescribed AOM GLP-1 RA, a significant difference (p < 0.01). Among those prescribed AOM GLP-1 RA, 15.2% of Medicare-aged patients and 22.7% of patients aged 60-64 were dispensed AOM GLP-1 RA within 60 days, a significant difference (p<0.01). In both age groups, prescribing and dispensing were more common for females and those with higher BMI.
Conclusions Fewer than 1% of older adults with overweight or obesity and without T2D were prescribed an AOM GLP-1 RA. New use of GLP-1 RA was significantly lower for Medicare-aged adults, compared to 60-64-year-olds, with differences occurring at both medication prescribing and dispensing stages. While coverage of AOMs is limited by many insurers, Medicare’s unique prohibition on AOM coverage may contribute to differentially lower use among Medicare-aged adults.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors except Vincent Zhang and Ezekiel Emanuel are employees of Truveta, Inc
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Normalized electronic health record data are de-identified by expert determination under the HIPAA Privacy Rule before being made available to researchers. In accordance with 46.101 Protection of Human Subjects, our study did not require Institutional Review Board approval because it used only deidentified medical records. All data used in this study are publicly available to Truveta subscribers and may be accessed at studio.truveta.com.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data used in this study are available to all Truveta subscribers and may be accessed at studio.truveta.com.
