Abstract
In the period immediately following surgery, patients are at high risk of various negative outcomes such as Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) and Myocardial Infarction (MI). Identifying patients at increased risk of developing these complications assists in their prevention and management. During surgery, rich time series data of vital signs and ventilator parameters are collected. This data holds enormous potential for the prediction of postoperative outcomes. There is, however, minimal work exploring this potential. Moreover, existing approaches rely on deep learning, which is computationally expensive, often requiring specialized hardware and significant energy consumption. We demonstrate that it is possible to extract substantial value from intraoperative time series using techniques that are extremely computationally efficient. We used recordings from 66 300 procedures at the Lyell McEwin Hospital (Adelaide, South Australia), occurring in 2013 through 2020. The procedures associated with 80% of the patients were used for model training, with the remainder held out for testing. A combination of techniques including MultiRocket, Multitask and logistic regression were used to predict Rapid Response Team (RRT) calls within 48 hours of surgery and mortality, AKI and elevated troponin levels within 30 days of surgery. This approach achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) (95% CI) on the test data of 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for mortality, 0.85 (0.84-0.87) for AKI, 0.89 (0.87-0.91) for elevated troponin levels and 0.80 (0.78-0.83) for RRT calls, outperforming the ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index on the test population for all outcomes. These results show that roughly equivalent accuracy to computationally expensive modelling approaches using diverse sources of clinical data can be achieved using highly computationally efficient techniques and only a small set of automatically recorded intraoperative time series. This implies substantial potential in the analysis of these time series for the improvement of perioperative patient care. We also performed an analysis of the measurement sampling rate required to achieve these results, demonstrating the advantage of high-frequency patient vitals monitoring.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the University of Adelaide
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number HREC16298). Local governance approval from the Northern Adelaide Local Health Network was also obtained (SSA 22 033).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data used in this study contains private patient information and so will not be made available to other parties.
