Abstract
Background Changes in body temperature anticipate labor onset in numerous mammals, yet this concept has not been explored in humans.
Methods We evaluated patterns in continuous skin temperature data in 91 pregnant women using a wearable smart ring. Additionally, we collected daily steroid hormone samples leading up to labor in a subset of 28 pregnancies and analyzed relationships among hormones and body temperature trajectory. Finally, we developed a novel autoencoder long-short-term-memory (AE-LSTM) deep learning model to provide a daily estimation of days until labor onset.
Results Features of temperature change leading up to labor were associated with urinary hormones and labor type. Spontaneous labors exhibited greater estriol to α-pregnanediol ratio, as well as lower body temperature and more stable circadian rhythms compared to pregnancies that did not undergo spontaneous labor. Skin temperature data from 54 pregnancies that underwent spontaneous labor between 34 and 42 weeks of gestation were included in training the AE-LSTM model, and an additional 40 pregnancies that underwent artificial induction of labor or Cesarean without labor were used for further testing. The model was trained only on aggregate 5-minute skin temperature data starting at a gestational age of 240 until labor onset. During cross-validation AE-LSTM average error (true – predicted) dropped below 2 days at 8 days before labor, independent of gestational age. Labor onset windows were calculated from the AE-LSTM output using a probabilistic distribution of model error. For these windows AE-LSTM correctly predicted labor start for 79% of the spontaneous labors within a 4.6-day window at 7 days before true labor, and 7.4-day window at 10 days before true labor.
Conclusion Continuous skin temperature reflects progression toward labor and hormonal status during pregnancy. Deep learning using continuous temperature may provide clinically valuable tools for pregnancy care.
Competing Interest Statement
Ouraring Inc. had the opportunity review the manuscript though was not involved in study analysis or preparation of results. The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
Funding: The present study was funded by Tech Launch Arizona at the University of Arizona; the parent study was funded by the Oregon Clinical Translational Research Institute supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR002369 and through an Oregon Health and Sciences University School of Nursing Foundation Innovations award. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or other funders. This was an investigator-led study to which Ouraring Inc. provided rings and data access as part of a data use agreement between institutions.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical Approval. The protocol for the original study was approved by an Institutional Review Board at Oregon Health & Science University and further via a Data Use Agreement with the University of Arizona for analyses of the de-identified dataset previously collected.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
C Basavaraj and A Grant are co-lead authors, and S Aras and E Erickson are co-senior authors. The title page on medrxiv doesn't make this clear so we wanted to add a callout.
Data Availability
Data and Code Availability: The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All code used to generate the findings here is available at - https://github.com/timebeforedelivery/laborprediction.git
