Abstract
Background Africa’s changing climate heightens risk of disease outbreaks with impacts on vulnerable demographics already encumbered by health and socioeconomic burdens. Health preparedness policies to address disease outbreaks rely on integrated information systems and value-for-cost analysis to facilitate sound decision-making during a public health emergency. This rapid scoping review protocol describes the a priori objectives and methods to conduct a synthesis of the evidence on economic evaluation and data system capacity at the intersection of pandemic preparedness and climate change.
Methods A search of six bibliographic databases will be conducted by a library information professional spanning the period 2010 – 2023, focused on literature published about pandemic preparedness in Africa in the context of climate change. Studies will be screened in a three-stage process by independent reviewers using Covidence software, with a proportion of excluded articles crosschecked by a reviewer not involved in screening. All articles included in the final study set will need to have a positive response to at least three out of four a priori screening questions. Data extraction will follow established frameworks for pandemic preparedness, a list of 14 target climate-sensitive infectious diseases with pandemic potential declared as Public Health Emergencies of International Concern and listed on the WHO’s R&D Blueprint Pathogens, and economic evaluation or data systems domains. Evidence synthesis will include article bibliometric analysis as well as thematic topic categorisation. Gap analysis will be conducted through topic mapping.
Discussion This protocol lists the methods and analysis that will be followed to survey the literature on the linkages between climate change and pandemic preparedness relating to economic evaluation and data systems structures and needs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the International Development Research Centre (Project Reference: 29957). The protocol was developed independently from the International Development Research Centre.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.