Abstract
Self-supervised pretraining can reduce the amount of labeled training data needed by pre-learning fundamental visual characteristics of the medical imaging data. In this study, we investigate several self-supervised training strategies for chest computed tomography exams and their effects of downstream applications. we bench-mark five well-known self-supervision strategies (masked image region prediction, next slice prediction, rotation prediction, flip prediction and denoising) on 15M chest CT slices collected from four sites of Mayo Clinic enterprise. These models were evaluated for two downstream tasks on public datasets; pulmonary embolism (PE) detection (classification) and lung nodule segmentation. Image embeddings generated by these models were also evaluated for prediction of patient age, race, and gender to study inherent biases in models’ understanding of chest CT exams. Use of pretraining weights, especially masked regions prediction based weights, improved performance and reduced computational effort needed for downstream tasks compared to task-specific state-of-the-art (SOTA) models. Performance improvement for PE detection was observed for training dataset sizes as large as with maximum gain of 5% over SOTA. Segmentation model initialized with pretraining weights learned twice as fast as randomly initialized model. While gender and age predictors built using self-supervised training weights showed no performance improvement over randomly initialized predictors, the race predictor experienced a 10% performance boost when using self-supervised training weights. We released models and weights under open-source academic license. These models can then be finetuned with limited task-specific annotated data for a variety of downstream imaging tasks thus accelerating research in biomedical imaging informatics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval granted by Internal Review Board (IRB) of Mayo Clinic.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(email: tariq.amara{at}mayo.edu); (email: patel.bhavik{at}mayo.edu); (email: banerjee.imon{at}mayo.edu)
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors