Abstract
Background The etiological connection between intraocular pressure (IOP) and the risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) remains elusive, particularly regarding whether this risk emanates from the direct influence of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), irrespective of the presence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), or if it arises as a consequence of the sequelae of POAG. Therefore, we conducted a Mendelian Randomization (MR) mediation analysis to elucidate the mediating role of POAG in the association between IOP and RVO.
Methods We identified 47 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with IOP (P-value < 5×10-8) leveraging data from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) (N = 97,653) obtained from the UK Biobank and 50 SNPs associated with POAG (P-value < 5×10-8) from a GWAS meta-analysis (16,677 cases and 199,580 controls). We related these SNPs with RVO using a GWAS of 775 RVO cases and 376,502 controls from FinnGen. By utilizing univariable and multivariable MR analyses we calculated the total effect of IOP on RVO and estimated the degree to which POAG mediates this association.
Results MR analyses showed that higher IOP is associated with higher RVO risk (odds ratio of RVO per 1 mmHg increase in IOP: 1.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 2.26; p-value = 0.03). Moreover, our MR mediation analysis suggested that 91.6% of the total effect of IOP on RVO risk was mediated through POAG. The primary results were consistent with estimates of pleiotropy-robust MR methods.
Conclusion Our findings suggest that higher IOP increases the risk of RVO and that the majority of this effect is mediated through POAG.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos