Abstract
Although research has demonstrated that transport infrastructure development can have positive and negative health-related impacts, most of this research has not considered mental health and wellbeing separately from physical health. There is also limited understanding of whether and how any effects might be experienced differently across population groups, whether this differs according to the stage of development (e.g. planning, construction), and how changes to planned infrastructure may affect mental health and wellbeing. This paper presents a protocol for the Wellbeing Impact Study of HS2 (WISH2), which seeks to address these questions using a high-speed rail development in the UK as an applied example. WISH2 is a 10-year, integrated, longitudinal, mixed-methods project using general practices (primary medical care providers in the UK) as an avenue for participant recruitment and for providing a geographically defined population for which aggregated data on mental health indicators are available. The research comprises: (i) a combined longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cohort study involving multiple waves of survey data collection and data from medical records; (ii) longitudinal, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with residents and community stakeholders from exposed areas; (iii) analysis of administrative data aggregated at the general practice population level; and (iv) health economic analysis of mental health and wellbeing impacts. The study findings will support the development of strategies to reduce negative impacts and/or enhance positive mental health and wellbeing impacts of high-speed rail developments and other large-scale infrastructure projects.
Competing Interest Statement
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Roger Mackett is a member of Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee which advises the government on the transport needs of disabled people.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN58916738
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study has been reviewed and approved by the East of England (Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire) Research Ethics Committee (22/EE/0292) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS302856).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Katherine I. Morley* Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
Lucy Hocking Roles: Investigation, Project Administration, Resources, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
Catherine L. Saunders Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
Jennifer W. Bousfield Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing
Jennifer Bostock Roles: Public involvement and ethics, reviewing and drafting
James Brimicombe Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Software, Resources, Project Administration
Thomas Burgoine Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & editing
Jessica Dawney Roles: Investigation, Project Administration, Writing - Reviewing & Editing
Joanna Hofman Roles: Investigation, Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing
Daniel Lee Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Investigation, and Writing - Review & Editing.
Roger Mackett Roles: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
William Phillips Roles: Investigation, Project Administration, Writing - Review & Editing
Jon Sussex Roles: Conceptualisation, methodology, supervision, writing - review and editing.
Stephen Morris Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
Funding: This research is funded by The Department for Transport and High Speed 2 Ltd and is independently managed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR132761). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of The Department for Transport, High Speed 2 Ltd, or the National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Competing interests: Roger Mackett is a member of Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee which advises the government on the transport needs of disabled people.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.
