RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.31.24302086
DO 10.1101/2024.01.31.24302086
A1 Morley, Katherine I.
A1 Hocking, Lucy
A1 Saunders, Catherine L.
A1 Bousfield, Jennifer W.
A1 Bostock, Jennifer
A1 Brimicombe, James
A1 Burgoine, Thomas
A1 Dawney, Jessica
A1 Hofman, Joanna
A1 Lee, Daniel
A1 Mackett, Roger
A1 Phillips, William
A1 Sussex, Jon
A1 Morris, Stephen
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/31/2024.01.31.24302086.abstract
AB Although research has demonstrated that transport infrastructure development can have positive and negative health-related impacts, most of this research has not considered mental health and wellbeing separately from physical health. There is also limited understanding of whether and how any effects might be experienced differently across population groups, whether this differs according to the stage of development (e.g. planning, construction), and how changes to planned infrastructure may affect mental health and wellbeing. This paper presents a protocol for the Wellbeing Impact Study of HS2 (WISH2), which seeks to address these questions using a high-speed rail development in the UK as an applied example. WISH2 is a 10-year, integrated, longitudinal, mixed-methods project using general practices (primary medical care providers in the UK) as an avenue for participant recruitment and for providing a geographically defined population for which aggregated data on mental health indicators are available. The research comprises: (i) a combined longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cohort study involving multiple waves of survey data collection and data from medical records; (ii) longitudinal, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with residents and community stakeholders from exposed areas; (iii) analysis of administrative data aggregated at the general practice population level; and (iv) health economic analysis of mental health and wellbeing impacts. The study findings will support the development of strategies to reduce negative impacts and/or enhance positive mental health and wellbeing impacts of high-speed rail developments and other large-scale infrastructure projects.Competing Interest StatementI have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Roger Mackett is a member of Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee which advises the government on the transport needs of disabled people.Clinical TrialISRCTN58916738Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/hqgdt/ Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study has been reviewed and approved by the East of England (Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire) Research Ethics Committee (22/EE/0292) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS302856).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesNo datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.