ABSTRACT
Background The cardiovascular benefits provided by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) extend beyond weight reduction and glycemic control. One possible mechanism may relate to blood pressure (BP) reduction. We aim to quantify the BP lowering effect by GLP1-RAs.
Methods A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until December 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with mean difference (MD) in millimeters mercury (mmHg) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in systolic and diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were done to account for covariates.
Results Compared to placebo, GLP-1RAs modestly reduced SBP (semaglutide: MD −3.40, [95% CI −4.22 to −2.59, p<0.001], liraglutide: MD −2.61, [95% CI −3.48 to −1.74, p<0.001], dulaglutide: MD −1.46, [95% CI −2.20 to −0.72, p<0.001] and exenatide: MD −3.36, [95% CI - 3.63 to −3.10, p<0.001]). This benefit consistently increased with longer treatment duration. Established people with type 2 diabetes experienced less SBP lowering with semaglutide. DBP reduction was only significant in the exenatide group (MD −0.94, [95% CI −1.78 to −0.1], p=0.03). Among semaglutide cohorts, mean change in hemoglobin A1c and mean change in body mass index were directly associated with SBP reduction.
Conclusion Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest SBP lowering compared to placebo. Only exenatide reduced DBP. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms and the clinical benefit of GLP-1RA effects in BP reduction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No specific financial support was obtained to prepare this article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB approval is not required for this submission.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
Funding: None
Disclosures: MG: Consultant Fees/Honoraria: Esperion, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim Research/Research Grants: Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program-Department of Defense (WARRIOR study)
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- BP
- blood pressure
- BMI
- body mass index
- DBP
- diastolic blood pressure
- GLP-1RA
- glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
- MD
- mean difference
- RCTs
- randomized controlled trials
- SBP
- systolic blood pressure
- T2DM
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
