Exploring Beauty Product Accessibility for Individuals with Upper Extremity Disabilities

Introduction

Hand function and upper extremity capabilities play a crucial role in our daily lives, profoundly impacting activities of daily living (ADLs), encompassing a broad spectrum from basic self-care like eating and dressing to more complex activities such as using technology or engaging in hobbies (D. Kim, 2016; Yamamoto et al., 2022; Yoo & Park, 2015). The upper extremities, including hands, arms, and shoulders, facilitate a diverse range of movements, essential for interacting with our environment and maintaining independence (D. Kim, 2016; Pollock et al., 2014; Synek et al., 2023). This relationship between upper extremity function and ADLs is a vital area of study in fields such as occupational therapy and rehabilitation medicine (Alsubiheen et al., 2022; Pollock et al., 2014). Impairments in these areas may be due to injury, neurological disorders, congenital disorders, or degenerative conditions. For example, conditions like stroke, spinal cord injury, or arthritis can limit the strength, range of motion, and coordination of the upper extremities, challenging everyday tasks such as dressing, eating, or even using digital devices (D. Kim, 2016; Mano et al., 2018; Richards & Pohl, 1999; Yamamoto et al., 2022). This leads to a critical need for therapeutic interventions and adaptive strategies to enhance or maintain functional independence.

The realm of beauty products, a vital part of daily life for many, often overlooks the unique needs of individuals with upper extremity disabilities (Nast, 2021; Zhang et al., 2020). This oversight impacts not only the usability of these products but also the autonomy and self-esteem of this population (Entwistle et al., 2010; Wu & Chao, 2023). While there has been some advancement in accessible design across various sectors, beauty products specifically designed for individuals with upper extremity disabilities or with adaptations for this population are still scarce (Gregg, 2023; S. Kim, 2022). Beauty items, ranging from cosmetics to skincare, are predominantly designed with standard packaging and applicators that lack features that address the specific challenges faced by those with limited mobility or dexterity, creating a significant design gap. The lack of consideration for diverse physical abilities can result in barriers to accessing and using these products effectively (Gallagher, 2021; Nast, 2021).

Oversight in product design often leads to difficulties in gripping, opening, or maneuvering beauty items, thereby limiting the independence of individuals with upper extremity disabilities (Gregg, 2023; Gallagher, 2021; Nast, 2021). Products that are not user-friendly can contribute to frustration and may even discourage participation in beauty routines. The inability to access and use beauty products can significantly impact self-esteem, as personal grooming and appearance are essential aspects of self-expression. Accessible beauty products that consider factors such as ease of use, application and ergonomic design, on the other hand, empower individuals with disabilities to maintain a sense of autonomy in their daily lives (Bido, 2023; Entwistle et al., 2010; Toscano, 2023a, 2023b). Enabling independence in the use of beauty products not only contributes to a positive self-image but also enhances overall well-being.

The beauty industry is witnessing a rising awareness of disability inclusivity, with a handful of recognized brands, like Rare Beauty and Guide Beauty, taking the lead. Notably these brands’ founders are open about their lived experiences with disability. But the journey towards broader inclusivity that deliberately meets the needs of consumers with disabilities is still in its nascent stages despite clear user feedback on the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities (Camero, 2023; Gregg, 2023). There is a lack of commitment in terms of attention and resources to create products inclusive of individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, there is a significant research gap in addressing the accessibility of beauty products for these individuals. Understanding their unique needs in greater depth is crucial for crafting effective, inclusive solutions. Overcoming this gap necessitates a more proactive stance in integrating a variety of user experiences into design processes. Research in the field of accessible design underscores the importance of developing inclusive products in the cosmetics and personal care industry, advocating for the incorporation of ergonomic designs and adaptive features to better serve individuals with upper extremity impairments. This study, therefore, aimed to bridge this gap by investigating and enhancing the accessibility of beauty products for individuals with upper extremity disabilities. The significance of this research lies not only in its potential to influence product design but also in its implications for occupational therapy, where the focus on enhancing daily living skills and independence is paramount. Enhancing the accessibility of beauty products directly contributes to improving the overall quality of life for individuals with upper extremity disabilities. This research recognizes the role that personal grooming and appearance impact well-being and seeks to positively influence these aspects of daily life. Occupational therapists can utilize insights from this research to tailor interventions that address specific challenges related to beauty routines, ultimately enhancing their clients’ overall independence.

Methods

Results

The study consisted of 57 individuals with a range of upper extremity disabilities, including stroke, TBI, SCI, and other neurologic and orthopedic conditions. The average age was 43.8 years, with a diverse distribution in terms of ethnicity, education, and disability levels in both gross and fine motor skills (Table 1). Participants with upper extremity disabilities reported various challenges during their makeup routine on the pre-test questionnaire. Physical difficulties included cramps, loss of sensation, and coordination issues, making it hard to maintain arm positions. Fine motor skill challenges were most pronounced with small makeup items like eyeliner and eyeshadow, requiring precise application. Bimanual tasks such as handling and opening containers was another challenging area, requiring the use of compensatory strategies, such as utilizing the mouth for assistance. Visual and cognitive impairments also complicated the makeup process, affecting routine memory and product application. When asked about specific product difficulties, eyeshadow, eyeliner, and mascara were frequently cited as challenging due to their size and the precision needed for application. Narrow and small products, such as concealers and eyeshadows in stick or pen form, were identified as problematic, as were items with twist-off caps. Participants also found compact containers and pressed powder products difficult to handle. While some found pump dispensers more accessible, others struggled with them, while spray products posed challenges for some participants as well.

Participants were also asked about accessible beauty products in the pre-test questionnaires. Participants indicated that items with pump dispensers, larger containers and brushes, as well as cream-based products were easier to use. Unique designs such as slide packaging and products with thick-handled wands or applicators were also called out for improved accessibility. Preferred product packaging included easy-to-grip, matte, glass materials and secure closure mechanisms. Difficulties were noted with opening certain types of packaging, such as lipstick and moisturizers. Suggestions for improvement included longer applicator wands, changes in packaging materials for easier grip, and design modifications to accommodate specific medical conditions.

Participant feedback from the trial period underscores that the design features of beauty products, such as packaging ergonomics—encompassing bottle shape, cap design, and texture— noticeably influence their accessibility and usability. Notably, a vast majority of participants (77-96%) praised the design of the products’ containers for their comfort on hands and wrists and their ability to minimize dropping or slipping compared to traditional pump/squeeze bottles. Over 80% of participants found the cap of several products easier to hold and in many cases easier to open. Additionally, over 85% of users agreed that the product applicator shape facilitated easy and effective application, while the blendability and consistency of the product formulas were positively rated by 80% or more participants, improving and enhancing the experience of even product application (data for all products in Tables 2 – 3 and Supplemental Tables 6-10).

A more detailed examination of these product design elements using chi-square analysis found significant differences in user experience based on level of upper extremity impairments. Participants with mild to moderate fine motor impairments, for example, had a significant preference for the grip of the Liquid Touch Weightless Foundation bottle (Chi-sq = 9.3*), pointing to how tailored product design can markedly improve usability for individuals with different dexterity levels. Similarly, the Positive Light Liquid Luminizer’s bottle size and the ease with which the wand could be removed were significant aspects of product satisfaction for individuals with more pronounced fine motor impairments (Chi-sq = 10.54* and 9.56*, respectively). For the Soft Pinch Tinted Lip Oil, the texture of the bottle and the design of the handle significantly impacted the comfort and ease of application for participants with both gross motor and fine motor impairments (Chi-sq = 12.75*). Additionally, the cap of the Kind Words Matte Lipstick was noted for its comfortable grip, especially by users with fine motor impairments who found it significantly easier to manage (Chi-sq = 9.59*). The overall feedback from the study suggests that while all the products tested were comfortable and easy to use across different levels of disability, the highest comfort levels were reported by individuals with more severe fine motor impairments (data for all products in Tables 4 – 5 and Supplemental Tables 11-15).

Discussion

The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential accessibility of various Rare Beauty makeup products for individuals with upper extremity disabilities. The findings emphasize the importance of inclusivity in product design, making these beauty products more accessible and user-friendly for a wider range of individuals. The study’s outcome measures included qualitative evaluations of usability, satisfaction, and barriers to using standard beauty products, along with quantitative ratings for ease of use, comfort, and overall product satisfaction. The data highlighted the significance of product design in catering to the needs of individuals with upper extremity disabilities, considering their motor skill abilities. Ease of handling, cap and cap removal, product application, fluidity and consistency, and overall comfort play essential roles in determining the user experience for these products. The study’s findings revealed that the design of beauty products significantly influences their accessibility and usability for individuals with varying motor skill abilities. For instance, the design of the Liquid Touch Weightless Foundation was well-received, with users appreciating the finish of the bottle, ease of applicator wand usage, and the cap’s grip, making it comfortable for their hands and wrists. Similarly, the Positive Light Liquid Luminizer, Soft Pinch Tinted Lip Oil, Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer, Kind Words Matte Lipstick, Soft Pinch Liquid Blush, and Positive Light Tinted Moisturizer were all positively rated for their design elements, contributing to a comfortable and efficient user experience.

Globally, it is estimated that over 1 billion people, or 15% of the world’s population, live wit some form of disability and that 80% of disabilities are acquired between the ages of 18 and 64, as reported by the World Health Organization (Factsheet on Persons with Disabilities | United Nations Enable; WHO) This demographic represents a significant portion of the Global population, including a substantial part of the adult population with disposable income (Diverse Perspectives).

The disability community, which is the largest minority group in many countries including the United States, stands out as it is the only group that anyone can join at any time due to the unpredictable onset of disabilities (Factsheet on Persons with Disabilities United Nations Enable; WHO). This study underscored the critical role of motor abilities in the accessibility and usability of beauty products, highlighting the necessity for designs that accommodate a broad spectrum of functional capabilities. The results indicate that while all tested products were found to be comfortable and user-friendly for people with varying levels of disability, those with more severe fine motor impairments experienced the greatest comfort. This finding emphasizes the importance of continuous innovation in product design to address the diverse requirements of all consumers, with a particular focus on individuals with upper extremity disabilities.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

We wish to disclose that our research, titled “Exploring Beauty Product Accessibility for Individuals with Upper Extremity Disabilities,” received funding from Rare Beauty. The brand provided financial support for the materials and resources necessary to conduct the study, including the beauty products tested by participants.

Despite this financial contribution, Rare Beauty held no influence over the study’s design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation. Our findings and conclusions were drawn independently, and Rare Beauty had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Each author has contributed significantly to the work and maintained academic and research integrity throughout the study. We have conducted our research under the ethical guidelines provided by our institutional review board, which emphasizes the importance of transparency and objectivity in our scientific inquiry.

We declare this conflict of interest to maintain the transparency and uphold the integrity of the research process and the dissemination of our findings.

Research ethics section and patient consent

The research presented in this manuscript was conducted with the approval of the Casa Colina Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) (FWA0006711), adhering to the highest ethical standards in research involving human subjects. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Casa Colina Hospital IRB and consistent with the revised (2000) Helsinki Declaration, as detailed on the World Medical Association website.