Serological Survey in a university community after the fourth wave of COVID-19 in Senegal

Introduction

The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), newly identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, is an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1, 2]. On January 30 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a public health emergency of global concern, and on March 11, 2020, it announced the COVID-19 epidemic as a pandemic [3]. By November 12, 2023, more than 697 million of people had been infected worldwide, with over 6.9 million deaths [4].

The COVID-19 outbreak had substantial economic, social, and health repercussions and damaging educational consequences [5–7]. In April 2020, the World Bank estimated that higher education institutions had been closed in 175 countries and that studies had been interrupted or significantly disrupted due to COVID-19, affecting more than 220 million students [8]. The pandemic forced academic communities to adopt online platforms for the continuity of teaching and learning activities, negatively impacting learning outcomes, particularly in developing countries where the lack of network infrastructures, computers, and internet access is challenging distance learning in developing countries [9, 10].

In Senegal, a West African country, the first case of SARS-CoV-2 was identified on March 2, 2020. Since then, the number of cases has risen considerably, and the country currently has more than 89,022 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 1,971 deaths [11]. The onset of the pandemic led the government authorities to close higher education establishments from March 16 to August 31 2020. The reopening of the establishments took place with the introduction of sanitary protocols that emphasized the reinforcement of barrier measures (wearing masks, hand washing with soapy water or hydroalcoholic gel, respect for social distancing and systematic taking of body temperature at campus access points) [12]. However, these measures have often been insufficient to stem the spread of the virus. Clusters quickly appeared in some establishments, including the Cheikh Anta Diop (CAD) University, located in Dakar, the capital of Senegal.

The failure of strategies to combat the spread of the virus could be linked to multiple factors, including (i) CAD University ecosystem, with its over 80,000 students from diverse origins. The consequence is overcrowding in student residences that caused the spread of the virus; (ii) the university environment is mainly populated by young people, who do not seem to be fully aware of the risks associated with the COVID-19 health crisis [13]; (iii) the promiscuity in the Halls of residence, making it difficult to comply with social preventive measures; (iv) Lastly, lack of vaccine deployment and reluctance was noted among young people, which also contributes to low vaccination coverage in universities [14].

Faced with all these difficulties, it was essential to adopt cyclical measures to manage the COVID-19 pandemic, characterised by the virus spreading in waves [15, 16]. These measures could involve introducing survey studies based on diagnostic testing and mass screening protocols to diagnose and follow up with people exposed to or infected with SARS-CoV-2. In practice, detecting viral RNA by RT-PCR is the reference method for confirming the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection [17, 18]. However, access to diagnostic tests still needs to be improved in poor countries [19]. The other way to estimate the true extent of the epidemic is to conduct Seroprevalence surveys [20, 21]. Seroepidemiological studies to detect the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are a valuable tool for assessing the timing of the epidemic. It can help to confirm the presence of a recent infection when PCR is limited. Some antibodies, such as IgG, can even be detected years after exposure [22]. Their detection can be used to identify previous or recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2. By carrying out this analysis on a representative population, it is possible to estimate what proportion of the population has already been exposed to the new coronavirus [23]. This information is helpful in identifying the epidemic phases and can help the authorities make decisions and even anticipate appropriate measures to contain the pandemic’s spread [24]. Sero-epidemiological studies have been conducted in academic institutions such as universities in many countries [25–28]. However, more studies are highly relevant because university communities (faculty, staff and students) could be among the most exposed to SARS-CoV-2. In Senegal, no seroprevalence studies have been conducted in cohorts of educational institutions.

Therefore, we conducted an on-site screening project at Polytechnic High School (PHS), a public institution with an inter-African vocation at CAD University from May to August 2022 after the fourth wave of Coronavirus disease in Senegal. We aimed to assess the true extent of previous and recent COVID-19 exposition among students and staff and to investigate the risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG seropositivity.

2. Materials and Methods

3. Results

3.1. Baseline characteristics of participants

From the 1000 students, professors and TAS officers of PHS who were invited to participate in the study between 19 May 2022 and 18 August 2022, 637 (63.7%) participants were finally included (Figure 1). The most represented group was students (88.38%), followed by TAS officers (8.16%), and professors (3.45%). The mean age was 23.20 years, ranging from 18 to 63 years. The population’s median age was 21 years, with most participants aged 18 to 25 years, representing 85.7% of the population (Table I). 62.0% of the participants were female, and 36.89% were male, with a male-to-female ratio = 0.59. Most participants were Senegalese (94.66%) and lived in family homes (54.6%). In addition, most ethnic groups in the PHS population were Wolof (31.24%), Fula (24.33%) and Serer (21.98%). The prevalences of active smoking and taking alcohol were relatively low in the PHS community at the moment of the survey (1.9%) and (3.62%), respectively. Demographic data are shown in Table I. Calculation of body mass index also revealed the highest prevalence of normal weight (37.68%), followed by underweight (10.8%) and overweight/obesity, 8.32%). The most common blood group is O+ (47.08%). At the time of data collection, unvaccinated vs. vaccinated participants were 57.46% and 35.01 %) respectively.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Flowchart of participants’ enrolment for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalencestudy in Superior Polytechnic School

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup

Table I: Baseline characteristics of the study population

3.2. Compliance with preventive measures and antibodies’ seroprevalence

Most respondents reported a low level of compliance with the following preventive measures recommended by the health authorities: 31.39% among participants declared that they had worn a mask always or often, and 18.21% observed a physical distance (minimum 2 m) over the last 15 days. However, most participants reported a high level of compliance with hand washing: 75.35% had washed their hands always or often (Figure 2A). For social distancing, the majority of participants, 71.58%, reported 0-2 frequencies of Participation in social events during the 15 days before the survey; 70.8% declared that they used public transport at least 2 times a day; and finally, 62.16% had visited someone 15 days before the survey (Figure 2B).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Compliance,,vith Preventive measures recommended by authorities

4. Discussion

This is the first sero-epidemiological survey of COVID-19 carried out in an educational establishment in Senegal. The study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of IgM and IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and associated risk factors in order to assess the extent of virus exposure within the Polytechnic High School in Cheikh Anta Diop University. The survey was carried out on samples collected from personnel and students from May 2022 to August 2022, after the fourth wave of COVID-19 in Senegal. A total of 637 participants were included in the study, 62% of whom were women and 37% men. The median age was 21, which is justified by the fact that the study was conducted in a university environment. Consequently, the study population predominantly comprises students representing around 86% of the participants.

We showed high IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalences of 92% (95% CI: 89.90 – 94.11) and 6.91% (95% CI: 4.93 – 8.87), respectively. The IgM seroprevalence indicates that the virus was circulating within PHS at the time of the survey, with people who were currently or recently infected. Indeed, in seroprevalence surveys, it is recommended to use IgM and IgG detection to diagnose recent and previous infections [32]. IgM antibody levels rise around a week after the initial infection, indicating a recent infection [22]. IgG antibodies appear later than IgM antibodies (generally within 14 days of infection). They can persist for up to a year [33, 34], meaning that IgG antibodies serve as an indicator of an old infection [35].

The very IgG high seroprevalence could be due to increased exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the anti-COVID vaccination policy implemented by the authorities. Data from the Ministry of Health showed that our study occurred after the fourth wave of COVID-19 in Senegal in January 2022, and the deployment of the COVID-19 vaccine began in February 2021 [36], which could explain our result. The first seroprevalence surveys carried out in Senegal were conducted in 2020 after the first wave and showed a lower seroprevalence of around 20%. Between June and September 2020, Seck et al. found a SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rate of 21.1% (95% CI = 16.7–26.1%) [37]. During the same period, Ahouidi et al. conducted a study between June and October 2020. They found that the overall positivity rate was 20.4% and significant geographical differences in seropositivity with a higher seroprevalence in Dakar, around 40% [38]. Then, Talla et al. found an adjusted national prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM in Senegal estimated to be 28.4% between October 24 and November 26, 2020 [39]. A high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalences and its variability between localities were also reported in the second national population based cross-sectional survey (72,2%) conducted in November 2021 [40] and among pregnant women attending the antenatal consultation (69,4%) during the second and third waves of COVID-19 in Senegal [41].

Results showed a sharp increase in seroprevalence since 2020 in Senegal, and data corroborating the finding that several variants have circulated in the country, including the delta variant, which has been the most deadly and caused a peak in the number of confirmed cases in July 2021 [42]. Study carried out in Africa at the same time as our survey showed similarly high seroprevalence, with 74% between July and August 2022 in Bangui, Central African Republic [43]. In Nigeria, in early 2021, there was a high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence of 72.4% [44]. Given this situation, it seems very important to carry out cyclical epidemiological survey studies to measure the extent of the spread of the SARS-CoV-2.

Interestingly, we found a higher IgM seroprevalence in men than women (9.4% vs. 5.6%). Then, our result would suggest that men are more sensitive to infection and/or reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 than women. A study conducted at the start of the pandemic by Takahashi et al. showed that men were more susceptible to severe forms of COVID-19 than women [45]. Gender differences in immune responses were also reported, with higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-8 and IL-18) and a more robust induction of non-classical monocytes in men [46]. This is consistent with studies that analysed the sex difference in antibody responses [47]. In further studies, it will be interesting compare immune responses according to gender and serological status in order to discover the mechanisms underlying sex differences.

Our results also showed a different distribution by age group, with lower IgM seroprevalence in younger individuals, particularly those aged 18-25 years, compared to those aged 55-65 years (5.5% and 33.34%, respectively) with a p < 0,001. The 18-25 age group appears less affected by recent infections. This reinforces the data showing that young people are less affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection [48]. Furthermore, they often experience an asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with lower serum titers [49]. In Senegal, during the first wave, it was reported that seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was higher in patients older than 65 years [37].

We investigated whether there was a link between the type of residence and IgM seroprevalence to determine the proportion of new infections accordingly. Surprisingly, we didn’t find a significant difference in terms of IgM seroprevalence among those living in halls of residence [7.97% (95% CI: 5.87 – 10.07)] compared to those living in family homes [6.68% (95% CI: 4.74 – 8.62)], p =0.73. This invalidates our hypothesis that the particular ecosystem of CAD University, with its over 80,000 students from diverse origins, would constitute a niche for spreading the virus, which is not proven in our study. It also appears that, even though the PHS community is mainly be composed by young people, they do not seem to facilitate new infection, contrary to what has been reported in other studies [48, 50].

Concerning compliance with preventive measures, we found a low level of compliance with preventive measures recommended by the health authorities, particularly for wearing masks (31.40%) and keeping a physical distance (minimum 2 m) (17.42%). However, most participants reported high-level compliance with hand washing (75.35%). Social distancing and staying at home were also registered although to a lower degree. Our results were in contradiction with those of Kearney et al. who observed high compliance with recommended COVID-19 prevention behaviors among their sample of Senegal respondents, particularly for masking and personal hygiene practices [51]. This difference could be explained by the fact that our study population is younger and less inclined to comply with preventive measures [52, 53]. Our findings revealed that IgM seropositivity depends on the ‘number of visits made to someone’, meaning non-respect of social distancing (p = 0.008), which shows the importance of WHO measures concerning the adoption of extensive social distancing as a non-pharmaceutical intervention to reduce the infection’s spread and the associated mortalities [54]. However, studies have shown that the impact of social distancing measures depends upon a host of demographic, environmental, and economic dimensions [55].

Regarding vaccination, around 35% of participants had been partially or totally vaccinated, which is higher than the national vaccination rate of 16.9% at the moment of the survey [56]. This could be explained by our population’s education level and knowledge of vaccination’s stakes. Efforts were also made by the CAD University authorities, who set up a vaccination campaign at various sites during October 2021. However, the vaccination rate remains low compared to the national level, where more than 70% of the population vaccinated since the pandemic started [57].

Furthermore, we found no significant differences in IgM seroprevalences between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. It would, therefore, appear that vaccination does not protect against the new variants and reinfections, as has already been demonstrated in numerous studies [58–60] indeed, WHO recommendations suggest that seasonal vaccination is necessary to protect against new variants [61].

We investigated the association of sociodemographic, clinical and lifestyle factors, such as BMI, blood type, smoking and alcohol consumption, with seropositivity using logistics. Then, we found an association between BMI categorised and IgM seropositivity (O.R. 0.238, p = 0.043). Previous studies have shown that obese individuals (BMI > 30 kg/m²) were significantly more likely to be seropositive. It is uncertain whether the raised seroprevalence in these groups represents a greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, obese individuals are known to experience more severe COVID-19 symptoms [62, 63].

Interestingly, a significant association between IgM seropositivity and ethnic group was found (O.R. 0.723, p = 0.046), suggesting a difference in susceptibility to SARS-CoV2-depending on race and ethnicity. According to previous findings, it seems there are disparities in the effects of COVID-19 infection among different racial/ethnic groups [64, 65]. Then, understanding the mechanisms for the disparity will help to evaluate the risk for COVID-19 according to ethnicity.

Our findings showed that IgM seropositivity was associated with marital status (unmarried/married) (O.R. 2.39, p = 0.021); another study reveals that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is variable among different people within the home. For instance, the risk for infection was higher between spouses, at 43%, which could be a reflection of transmission through intimacy or longer or more direct exposure [66].

Regarding vaccination status, we found a relationship between vaccination and IgG seroprevalence (O.R. 4.741, p < 0.001), showing that people who had received vaccine doses were four times more likely to produce anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies than those who had not. It will be interesting to determine the IgG-neutralizing antibodies and to determine antibody levels according to vaccination status and type. Indeed, it has been shown that vaccines from different manufacturers might induce different antibody responses [67].

Some limitations of our study must be considered. By design, we carried out an on-site university population-based cross-sectional study. Thus, the results cannot be extrapolated directly to the general CAD University population. Participants were subjected to recall bias when completing the questionnaires, particularly preventive measures at the time of contact. We also noted a very low level of participation from professors and TAS officers. This constitutes a bias in the statistical calculations. Missing data for certain criteria and non-prefer responders were a limitation for statistics. To date, our study is the only SARS-CoV-2 sero-epidemiological survey conducted in a university community in Senegal. Data on the Serological testing performed by measuring IgM and IgG immunoglobulins against the SARS-CoV-2 targeting peak S1 protein separately is a strength of our study. This allowed us to differentiate recent from previous infection. Finally, with our questionnaire we were able to collect a lot of data, which was useful in calculating associations with risk factors.

In summary, our analysis of more than 630 subjects from Polytechnic High School community members estimated the extent of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Our study revealed a high seroprevalence from May–August 2022 following the fourth wave of COVID-19 in Senegal. Our results show that the majority of students and staff have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and confirm the circulation of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) at the time of the survey as shown by the high IgM and IgG seroprevalence. The data show a link between seropositivity and various factors such as age, non-compliance with prevention measures. These results underline the importance of sero-epidemiological surveys to estimate the real impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the disparities between populations in order to establish a profile of the transmission dynamics of the virus. In addition, these results may be essential for the CAD university in the event of the emergence of future waves in order to make appropriate decisions and put in place means of monitoring the evolution of the pandemic after the relaxation of social distancing measures and the implementation of a vaccination schedule at CAD University, which will serve as a basis for other universities in Senegal.

Author Contributions

“Conceptualization, F.T. and A.A.M.D, C.M.N, M.D.; methodology, F.T., A.A.M.D., C.S.C.A.N., S.S., S.D.T, S.C., A.S., D.D., and M.N.M; software, F.T., C.S.C.A.N., I.D., D.D., K.K., I.D.; A.L.D, M.D..; validation, F.T., A.A.M.D., C.M.N., S.M.S.; formal analysis, F.T., K.K, C.S.C.A.N., I.D., D.D.; A.L.D., M.D.; investigation, sample collection and biobank management, F.T., A.A.M.D., M.N.M, C.S.C.A.N, D.D., S.C., S.S., S.D.T., A.S.; resources, F.T., A.A.M.D., S.M.S, M.D.; data curation, F.T., S.S., C.S.C.A.N., D.D.; writing—original draft prepa-ration, F.T.; writing—review and editing, F.T., A.A.M.D., MNM, MD, CMN, KK, ID, SMS; visualization, F.T, A.A.M.D.; supervision, F.T.,A.A.M.D., S.M.S.,M.D.,C.M.N; project administration, F.T.; funding acquisition, F.T., A.A.M.D., and C.M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This research was funded by Polytechnique High School competitive research impulse fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Decla-ration of Helsinki, and approved approved by the Senegalese National Ethics Committee for Research in Health (Reference number N°000043/MSAS/CNERS/SP, 28 February 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results”.