Abstract
Background/aims To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer with Vision (GPT)-4 and GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) for clinical questions in ophthalmology.
Methods The questions were collected from the “Diagnosis This” section on the American Academy of Ophthalmology website. We tested 580 questions and presented GPT-4V with the same questions under two conditions: 1) multimodal model, incorporating both the question text and associated images, and 2) text-only model. We then compared the difference in accuracy between the two conditions using the chi-square test. The percentage of general correct answers was also collected from the website.
Results The GPT-4V model demonstrated higher accuracy with images (71.7%) than without images (66.7%, p<0.001). Both GPT-4 models showed higher accuracy than the general correct answers on the website [64.6 (95%CI, 62.9 to 66.3)].
Conclusions The addition of information from images enhances the performance of GPT-4V in diagnosing clinical questions in ophthalmology. This suggests that integrating multimodal data could be crucial in developing more effective and reliable diagnostic tools in medical fields.
SYNOPSIS The study compared the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4 and GPT-4 with Vision for clinical questions in ophthalmology, finding that the performance improved when it analyzed both text and images.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC Text-based large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing medical interpretation and diagnosis. Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 with Vision (GPT-4V) can address image-related questions, but the use of GPT-4V in ophthalmology has not yet been validated.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Our study reports the answer accuracy on ‘Diagnose This,’ provided by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, using GPT-4V. The integration of image data with GPT-4V enhances diagnostic accuracy in addressing ophthalmic clinical questions.
HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY Our study indicates that combining image data with GPT-4 can enhance diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmic clinical questions. The development of LLMs trained on medical-specific datasets could further increase accuracy, advancing towards practical clinical applications.
Competing Interest Statement
K.T.: Lecture fees - Senju Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and KOWA T.N: Consultant - Topcon Y.K.: None M.M.: None K.K.: None
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability statement
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
