ABSTRACT
The quest for noninvasive early markers for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has yielded diverse measures of interest. However, comprehensive studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of multiple measures and stimuli within a single study are scarce, and a standardized clinical protocol for robust early markers of SNHL remains elusive. To address these gaps, this study explores the intra-subject variability of various potential EEG-biomarkers for cochlear synaptopathy (CS) and other SNHL-markers in the same individuals. Fifteen normal-hearing young adults underwent repeated measures of (extended high-frequency) pure-tone audiometry, speech-in-noise intelligibility, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory evoked potentials; comprising envelope following responses (EFR) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Results confirm high reliability in pure-tone audiometry, whereas the matrix sentence-test exhibited a significant learning effect. The reliability of DPOAEs varied across three evaluation methods, each employing distinct SNR-based criteria for DPOAE-datapoints. EFRs exhibited superior test-retest reliability compared to ABR-amplitudes. Our findings emphasize the need for careful interpretation of presumed noninvasive SNHL measures. While tonal-audiometry’s robustness was corroborated, we observed a confounding learning effect in longitudinal speech audiometry. The variability in DPOAEs highlights the importance of consistent ear probe replacement and meticulous measurement techniques, indicating that DPOAE test-retest reliability is significantly compromised under less-than-ideal conditions. As potential EEG-biomarkers of CS, EFRs are preferred over ABR-amplitudes based on the current study results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by UGent BOF-IOP project: Portable Hearing Diagnostics: Monitoring of Auditory-nerve Integrity after Noise Exposure (EarDiMon), European research counsil proof of concept grant CochSyn (899858) and EU Innovation counsil Grant EarDiTech (101058278).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Ghent University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial disclosure: Ghent University holds a patent on the RAM-EFR stimulation protocol (U.S. patent App. 17/791,985 (Inventors: Sarah Verhulst, Viacheslav Vasilkov). This work was supported by UGent BOF-IOP project: “Portable Hearing Diagnostics: Monitoring of Auditory-nerve Integrity after Noise Exposure (EarDiMon), European research counsil proof of concept grant CochSyn (899858) and EU Innovation counsil Grant EarDiTech (101058278).
The revised manuscript highlights the suboptimal conditions in which the DPOAE tests are conducted, specifically noting that performing these tests outside a sound-attenuating measurement booth, even with the use of earmuffs, may affect the results.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical restriction but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
