Unique combination of Recombinase Polymerase Amplification with label-free citrate-stabilised silver nanoparticle assay offers a highly sensitive, fast, accurate and visual molecular detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae

InstaDNA card-based sample collection and DNA extraction followed by PCR based molecular identification of K. pneumoniae

We first optimized K. pneumoniae PCR, utilizing genomic DNA extracted using standard kit-based method and 2 sets of primers (Table 2), one described previously³⁰ and another newly designed in this study. Both the primer sets target 16s rRNA gene, however yield amplicons of two different sizes, ∼658 bp (primer set 1) and ∼250 bp (primer set 2), respectively. In addition, these primers were found to be highly specific without any cross-reactivity towards non-target organisms (Figure 1 A and B). However, both the primer sets showed specificity towards Enterobacter spp. in addition to K. pneumoniae (Figure 1 A and B), owing to the fact that both these organisms belong to the same family with a negligible genomic difference in their 16S rRNA region. AGE-based detection post-PCR amplification showed a sensitivity of detection of ∼33 bacteria (equivalent to ∼200 fg of gDNA of K. pneumoniae) (Figure 2 A and B).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Primer specificity and cross-reactivity verification of primers utilized for detection of K. pneumoniae by PCR-AGE.

Figures depict AGE-based verification of K. pneumoniae specific PCR carried out using two different primer sets designed to target 16S rRNA gene, A. Primer set 1 produce an amplicon of ∼658 bp, and B. Primer set 2 produce an amplicon of ∼250 bp. The primer specificity was verified using genomic DNA derived from human and various human pathogens as negative controls such as, M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum, and ESKAPE pathogens.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Sensitivity of K. pneumoniae PCR-AGE-based detection.

Figure depicts a sensitivity of detection of ∼200 fg of gDNA of K. pneumoniae (∼33 bacteria) using PCR-AGE employing A. Primer set 1 (658 bp amplicon), and B. Primer set 2 (250 bp). The labels on top of the gel indicate amount of the genomic DNA used per PCR reaction & approximation of the number of bacteria. The negative controls include-No template control (NTC) and a mix of genomic DNAs obtained from human and human pathogens, such as, M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum, and ESKAPE pathogens, except that of the test organism.

We next tested various genomic DNA isolation methods (boiling lysis, InstaDNA card and Whatman filter paper No. 1), suitable for POC using primer set 1 against 16S rRNA gene of K. pneumoniae (Figure 3). The InstaDNA card and Whatman filter paper No. 1 methods show comparably identical efficiency in elution and amplification (Figure 3). Due to the advantages of InstaDNA cards pertaining to their ease of sample collection, storage and logistics, we selected InstaDNA card for subsequent analysis and determined their sensitivity of detection for K. pneumoniae. The synergy of InstaDNA card followed by PCR-AGE shows a sensitivity of ∼330 bacterial cells of K. pneumoniae (Figure 4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Comparative analysis of various POC gDNA isolation techniques using PCR-AGE-based detection.

Figure depicts the AGE-based detection of PCR performed on gDNA isolated using different POC methodologies, namely, boiling lysis, InstaDNA card-based isolation, and Whatman Paper No 1 assay. The PCR was verified using primer set 1 (∼658 bp) specific to 16S rRNA gene of K. pneumoniae. InstaDNA card-based DNA isolation and Whatman Paper No 1 assay displayed comparable efficiency of DNA isolation. The labels on top of the gel indicate amount of the genomic DNA used per PCR reaction and the negative controls used for each technique.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4. Sensitivity of K. pneumoniae detection using InstaDNA card-based DNA isolation followed by PCR-AGE for detection.

Figure depicts the AGE-based detection of PCR performed on various dilutions of bacterial sample blotted onto InstaDNA card disc, without elution step, and using primer set 2 (∼250 bp) specific to 16S rRNA gene of K. pneumoniae. The assay shows a sensitivity of detection of ∼2 pg of gDNA of K. pneumoniae (∼330 bacteria). The labels on top of the gel indicate amount of the genomic DNA used per PCR reaction & approximation of the number of bacteria. The negative controls included a No template control (NTC).

Bridging flocculation assay and AgNP assay for molecular detection of K. pneumoniae post-PCR amplification

We next performed paramagnetic bead-based bridging flocculation assay following PCR and determined the sensitivity of visual detection and compared with PCR-AGE. PCR performed using both the primer sets (mentioned in Table 2) showed a comparable detection sensitivity of ∼33 bacteria (Figure 5 A and B), which is similar to PCR-AGE (Figure 2 A and B).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5. Sensitivity of K. pneumoniae detection by PCR and paramagnetic bead-based bridging flocculation assay.

Paramagnetic bead-based bridging flocculation assay was performed on PCR products obtained using 16S rRNA gene-specific primer set 1 and 2 yielding amplicon size of A. 658 bp and B. 250 bp, respectively. The assay displays a similar detection sensitivity of 200 fg (∼33 bacteria) using both the primer sets. Presence of PCR amplified DNA results in a visual floc (bead aggregate), however, absence or very low amount of amplified DNA result in dispersed state of magnetic beads (brown solution). The sensitivity of PCR-AGE (Figure 2) and PCR-Bridging flocculation assays were found to be comparable.

For further enhancing the sensitivity of visual detection, we performed AgNP assay on DNA obtained from PCR. The AgNP-based assay showed a 10-fold higher sensitivity of detection (∼3 bacteria, equivalent to ∼20 fg of gDNA of K. pneumoniae) compared to PCR-AGE and bridging flocculation (Figure 6 A and B). Hence, post-PCR amplification, silver nanoparticle assay, exhibits a higher sensitivity of detection as compared to flocculation assay and traditional AGE-based detection.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 6. Sensitivity of detection of K. pneumoniae by PCR and AgNP assay.

AgNP aggregation-based visual detection assay performed on PCR products obtained using 16S rRNA gene specific primer set 1 and 2 producing amplicon of, A. 658 bp and B. 250 bp, respectively. Both the primer sets display detection sensitivity of 20 fg of K. pneumoniae genomic DNA (∼3 bacteria). Presence of amplified DNA causes AgNPs to remain in dispersed state indicated by yellow color solution, however, absence or very low amount of amplified DNA results in aggregation of AgNPs in presence of the aggregating agent (NaCl), indicated by grey color solution.

RPA-based Isothermal amplification of K. pneumoniae 16S rRNA region followed by in-tube detection using AgNP

We next assessed if isothermal amplification techniques such as RPA can be used in combination with AgNP assay for rapid molecular detection of K. pneumoniae. RPA performs amplification in ambient conditions (25 - 42°C) and hence well suited for resource poor point-of-care (POC) settings, where scope of costly equipment is rare. We performed the RPA amplification of the target regions of K. pneumoniae at 37°C. Out of the two primer sets designed for the molecular detection of K. pneumoniae, only primer set 2 was found suitable for consistent amplification using RPA. RPA-AGE showed a dramatic 33-fold improvement in sensitivity of detection (∼1 bacterium) (Figure 7 A), compared to PCR-AGE (∼33 bacteria) (Figure 2 B). RPA-AgNP assay (Figure 7 B) also exhibited marked improvement in sensitivity of detection to as low as 1 bacterium comparable to RPA-AGE (Figure 7 A) and was also comparable to PCR-AgNP assay (Figure 6 B). We also tested paramagnetic bead-based bridging flocculation-based visual detection in combination with RPA. While the beads offer an easy method to clean up RPA amplified products, however, gives inconsistent results when used for flocculation based visual detection, hence not utilized for detection purpose (data not shown).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 7. Sensitivity of detection of K. pneumoniae by RPA-AGE and RPA-AgNP assay.

Figure depicts, A. AGE-based and B. Ag-NP assay-based detection of DNA amplified using RPA employing primer set 2 (amplicon size, ∼250 bp). The labels on top of the gel indicate amount of genomic DNA used per RPA reaction and the corresponding number of bacteria. Isothermal RPA-AGE and RPA-AgNP assays show comparable detection sensitivity of ∼10 fg of K. pneumoniae genomic DNA, equivalent to ∼1 bacterium.

Ethics Statement

The study was performed as per the guidelines and approval of the Institutional Biosafety Committee (BITS/IBSC/2019-1/7 and BITS/IBSC/2019-1/8) utilizing appropriate biosafety level 2 measures.

Reagents and bacterial strains

All the reagents employed in this study were sourced from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., unless mentioned otherwise. The oligonucleotide primers utilized, as outlined in Table 1, were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. MagGenome supplied the paramagnetic beads, while Sigma Aldrich provided the AgNP (20 nm size, stabilized in citrate buffer, 20 mg/ml). Taq polymerase and its associated reagents were procured from Takara Clontech. Twist Amp Liquid Basic RPA Kit was obtained from TwistDX^TM.

Cultures of Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), S. aureus (MTCC 96), K. pneumoniae (MTCC 109), A. baumanii (MTCC 12889), P. aeruginosa (MTCC 424), Enterobacter spp. (MTCC 7104) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ATCC 19424) were acquired from the American type culture collection (ATCC, distributed by Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.) or Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank (MTCC), maintained by Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Chandigarh, India. The WHO BCG Danish 1331 vaccine sub-strain was obtained from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), UK.

Sample Collection and DNA extraction

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from pure bacterial cultures using a standard kit-based method, specifically the DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), with minor adjustments to the manufacturer’s protocol. For cost-effective and rapid gDNA isolation, we employed various protocols, including Boiling Lysis³², Whatman filter paper No. 1³³ and InstaDNA card method^25–27. The resulting gDNA was quantified using NanoDrop Microvolume Spectrophotometers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and utilized for amplification reactions with species-specific primers.

In the Boiling Lysis method, bacterial cell-pellets were resuspended in an in-house lysis buffer (1X TE, 0.05% Triton-X 100), boiled at 95°C for 30 minutes, and centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 minutes to obtain the genomic DNA-containing supernatant. For the Whatman paper method, microbial cells were washed with 1X PBS, resuspended in an in-house extraction buffer (2% w/v CTAB, 1.42 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1% w/v polyvinylpyrrolidone [PVP 40]), and lysed. A 3 mm Whatman No.1 disc was incubated in the cell lysate, washed, and directly transferred to the PCR reaction mix for amplification. Alternatively, DNA was eluted by dipping the disc in elution buffer (1X TE), heated at 95°C for 2 minutes, and quantified as described above. In the InstaDNA card method, a known bacterial culture of colony forming units (CFU), e.g., 33×10^4/2 µL, was blotted onto a 3 mm InstaDNA card disc, allowed to dry, washed, and transferred to the PCR reaction mix for amplification. Alternatively, the disc was transferred to elution buffer for DNA elution by heating at 95°C for 2 minutes. Similarly, 10-fold serially diluted bacterial samples were blotted onto separate discs and processed accordingly.

PCR and Agarose gel electrophoresis (PCR-AGE)-based detection

Specific oligonucleotide primers targeting K. pneumoniae were custom-designed and are detailed in Table 2. Two sets of primers (set 1 and set 2) were designed targeting 16s rRNA gene of K. pneumoniae to achieve an amplicon size of ∼658 base pairs and ∼250 base pairs, respectively. Primer specificity was confirmed in silico through NCBI-BLAST analysis. PCR amplification was carried out in a Veriti Thermal Cycler from Applied Biosystems, using Taq Polymerase sourced from Takara Clontech, following the manufacturer’s instructions with minor adjustments. Each 50 μl PCR reaction was prepared with a 1 μM primer mix in the reaction mixture, and thermal cycling included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of PCR conditions outlined in Table 2. The process concluded with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes.

In order to validate the primer specificity for K. pneumoniae, genomic DNA samples from diverse organisms which could possibly cause respiratory infections or pneumoniae, were utilized as negative control, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb), Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), M. bovis BCG, N. gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, E. faecalis, S. aureus, A. baumanii, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp and human DNA. The verification of PCR products was performed through AGE and DNA was visualized by ethidium bromide dye-based staining. For sensitivity determination or limit of detection analysis of PCR-AGE, serial ten-fold dilutions of genomic DNA templates of K. pneumoniae ranging from 10 nanograms, ng (1.6×10⁶ bacteria) to 10 femtograms, fg (1 bacterium) were employed in PCR reactions.

RPA-AGE-based molecular detection of K. pneumoniae

Isothermal nucleic acid amplification was performed for the pathogens using Twist Amp Liquid Basic RPA Kit (TwistDX, TALQBAS01kit) as recommended by the manufacturer with minor modifications. Briefly, all the reagents provided in the kit are mixed with defined quantity of DNA, reaction is initiated by addition of magnesium acetate, followed by incubation at 37°C for 15-20 minutes. The RPA products are immediately cleaned up using XpressPure PCR Cleanup kit (MagGenome, MG20Pcr-50) or NucleoSpin gel and PCR clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, 740609.250) to eliminate enzymes, highly dense PEG and buffer components which are known to interfere with the agarose gel electrophoresis. Both the kits allow equivalent performance in terms of quality of the isolated DNA, however, MagGenome kit allows faster (20 minutes) purification using simple magnetic stand-based purification unlike other PCR clean up kits needing centrifuge and ∼60 min purification time. Henceforth, we utilized instrument-free paramagnetic bead-based purification for our study. Similar to PCR-AGE assay, we determined the sensitivity or limit of detection of the RPA-AGE using serial ten-fold dilutions of genomic DNA templates (10 ng - 10 fg, equivalent to 1.6×10⁶ bacteria – 1 bacterium of K. pneumoniae). DNA was visualized by ethidium bromide dye-based staining.

Visual detection of amplified products using bridging flocculation assay and citrate-stabilized AgNPs

Bridging flocculation assay and AgNP-based visual detection assays were performed using PCR amplified products as described by us previously²⁹. Briefly, paramagnetic beads work with a principle that they adsorb the amplified DNA molecules and flocculate upon addition of flocculation buffer (sodium acetate and tween 20 at an acidic pH) due to the formation of DNA bridges connecting the paramagnetic beads. Hence, presence of DNA amplified product is determined by floc formation. Absence of DNA or lesser amount of the amplified product doesn’t form visible floc as DNA bridges are not formed, as indicated by brown dispersion²⁹. Similarly, AgNP assay was carried out as described by us previously²⁹, wherein presence of DNA prevents the aggregation of AgNPs upon addition of aggregating agent, sodium chloride (NaCl) causing sliver dispersion to maintain yellow colour. However, in absence of DNA, addition of NaCl leads to AgNP aggregation causing grey coloration of the dispersion.

While PCR products were detected using AGE, bridging flocculation and AgNP assay, RPA-amplified products were exclusively detected visually using AgNP assay given the higher sensitivity of AgNP-based visual detection (∼3 bacteria) of PCR amplified products compared to bridging flocculation (∼33 bacteria). Briefly, 10 μl of RPA reaction products were made up to a volume of 50 μl using sterile water. Amplified products were then cleaned-up using MagGenome PCR clean up kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, DNA was eluted in 20 μl of elution buffer (10 mM Tris, 1mM EDTA, pH 8.0) followed by incubation with 50 μl of the citrate-stabilized AgNP dispersion at room temperature for ∼1 minute. Following this, 5 μl of aggregating reagent (5M NaCl) was added to the assay tubes. The onset of AgNP aggregation is promptly revealed (in < 1 min) by a grey colour dispersion in tubes lacking amplicons (negative controls with DNA from non-target organisms or no-template controls, NTC). Conversely, in tubes with amplified DNA, the addition of NaCl prevents AgNP aggregation, resulting in the retention of a yellow colour. The entire process of purification and visual detection is completed within a time frame of 20-25 minutes. The sensitivity of detection was assessed by executing AgNP aggregation-based assay using amplicons derived from RPA conducted with varying amounts of genomic DNA sourced from K. pneumoniae.