Abstract
Objective Machine learning methods hold the promise of leveraging available data and generating higher-quality data while alleviating the data collection burden on healthcare professionals. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses data, collected globally for billing and epidemiological purposes, represents a valuable source of structured information. However, ICD coding is a challenging task. While numerous previous studies reported promising results in automatic ICD classification, they often describe input data specific model architectures, that are heterogeneously evaluated with different performance metrics and ICD code subsets.
This study aims to explore the evaluation and construction of more effective Computer Assisted Coding (CAC) systems using generic approaches, focusing on the use of ICD hierarchy, medication data and a feed forward neural network architecture.
Methods We conduct comprehensive experiments using the MIMIC-III clinical database, mapped to the OMOP data model. Our evaluations encompass various performance metrics, alongside investigations into multitask, hierarchical, and imbalanced learning for neural networks.
Results We introduce a novel metric, RE@R, tailored to the ICD coding task, which offers interpretable insights for healthcare informatics practitioners, aiding them in assessing the quality of assisted coding systems. Our findings highlight that selectively cherry-picking ICD codes diminish retrieval performance without performance improvement over the selected subset. We show that optimizing for metrics such as NDCG and AUPRC outperforms traditional F1-based metrics in ranking performance. We observe that Neural Network training on different ICD levels simultaneously offers minor benefits for ranking and significant runtime gains. However, our models do not derive benefits from hierarchical or class imbalance correction techniques for ICD code retrieval.
Conclusion This study offers valuable insights for researchers and healthcare practitioners interested in developing and evaluating CAC systems. Using a straightforward sequential neural network model, we confirm that medical prescriptions are a rich data source for CAC systems, providing competitive retrieval capabilities for a fraction of the computational load compared to text-based models. Our study underscores the importance of metric selection and challenges existing practices related to ICD code sub-setting for model training and evaluation.
Statement of significance
Problem or Issue
Problem or Issue Accurate ICD coding is challenging and time consuming, leading to low data quality.
What is Already Known
What is Already Known Machine learning algorithms, could improve ICD coding but their use in production environments remains limited. Existing work focuses on input data specificities and automated classification on heterogeneous subsets of ICD codes.
What this Paper Adds
What this Paper Adds We introduce interpretable performance metrics tailored for computer assisted coding, and identify target metrics to improve ranking performance. We show that utilizing the full set of ICD codes is beneficial even for input data with seemingly low information. Furthermore, we explore multitask, hierarchical and class imbalance correction methods demonstrating their limited benefits.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used only the freely available MIMIC-III v1.4 clinical database available at https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii/1.4/.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. Software will be made available at https://github.com/qmarcou upon acceptance of the manuscript.
Acronyms
- AUPRC
- Area Under the Precision Recall Curve.
- AUROC
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve.
- BCE
- Binary Cross-Entropy.
- CAC
- Computer Assisted Coding.
- CNN
- Convolutionnal Neural Network.
- ECE
- Expected Calibration Error.
- HMC
- Hierarchical Multilabel Classification.
- ICD
- International Classification of Diseases.
- IRNW
- Imbalance Ratio Normalized Weighting.
- IRW
- Imbalance Ratio Weighting.
- MCE
- Maximum Calibration Error.
- MTL
- Multitask Learning.
- NDCG
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain.
- NLP
- Natural Language Processing.
- NN
- Neural Network.
- RNN
- Recurrent Neural Network.
- SVM
- Support Vector Machine.